“An Open Letter to Christians Who Love Bonhoeffer but (Still) Support Trump”
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Today Eerdmans has published the postscript to The Battle for Bonhoeffer . It is titled “An Open Letter to Christians Who Love Bonhoeffer but (Still) Support Trump . Some of you may recall that Eric Metaxas recently published an op-ed at The Wall Street Journal under the title “The Christian Case for Trump.”
Here is a taste of Haynes’s piece:
Your embrace of Trump is eerily reminiscent of German Christians’ attachment to Hitler in the early 1930s. I make this point not to convince you that Trump is Hitler but to remind you of the troubling ways Christians have compromised themselves in endorsing political movements in which they perceived the hand of God. I developed a scholarly interest in the churches’ role during the Nazi era in part so I could help ensure that Christians would never repeat the mistakes they made under Hitler. Similarly, Dietrich Bonhoeffer is one of my heroes in part because he was able to resist the wave of Hitler worship that swept up many German Protestants.
Being familiar with this history, I have been struck by how reminiscent many of your responses to Trump are of the way Christians in Germany embraced a strong leader they were convinced would restore the country’s moral order. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, many Christians in Germany let themselves be persuaded that Hitler was a deeply pious man, placed in power by God through a graceful act of intervention in German history. Hitler encouraged these ideas not by claiming any allegiance to Christ but by employing vague religious language, promising a return to the “good old days,” and posing for photographs as he left church, prayed, and entertained ecclesiastical leaders.
Here are a few examples of how Protestant Christian leaders in Germany spoke about God’s role in Hitler’s accession to power:
• “With National Socialism an epoch in German history has begun that is at least as decisive for the German people, as for example the epoch of Martin Luther.”
• “No one could welcome January 30, 1933 more profoundly or more joyfully than the German Christian leadership.”
• “Adolf Hitler, with his faith in Germany, as the instrument of our God became the framer of German destiny and the liberator of our people from their spiritual misery and division.”
• “[Hitler is] the best man imaginable, a man shaped in a mold made of unity, piety, energy and strength of character.”
• “[Hitler], the most German man, is also the most faithful, a believing Christian. We know that he begins and ends the course of his day with prayer, that he has found in the Gospel the deepest source of his strength.”
• “If the German who truly believed in Jesus could find the Spirit of the kingdom of God anywhere, he could find it in Adolf Hitler’s movement.”
• “In the pitch-black night of Christian church history, Hitler became like a wonderful transparency for our time, a window through which light fell upon the history of Christianity.”
• “[God has granted us an] hour of grace . . . through Adolf Hitler.”
• “God has once again raised his voice in a singular individual.”13 Compare these statements with those made in recent months by American charismatic and evangelical leaders:
• “God raised up . . . Donald Trump” (Michelle Bachman).
• “God has righteously chosen [Trump] to affect the way that this nation goes forward” (Chuck Pierce).
• “Donald Trump represents a supernatural answer to prayer” (James Robison).
• “God had raised up [Trump] for such a time as this” (Stephen Strang).
• “Donald Trump actively seeks God’s guidance in his life” (James Dobson).
• Trump’s victory “showed clear evidence of ‘the hand of God’ on the election” (Franklin Graham).
• “[Trump is] a bold man, a strong man, and an obedient man” (Kenneth Copeland).
• “I see this as a last-minute reprieve for America, and the Church” (Rodney Howard-Browne).
• “[Trump] does look like he’s the last hope” (Phyllis Schlafly).
• “God was raising up Donald Trump as He did the Persian king Cyrus the Great” (Lance Wallnau).
• “[Trump is] a man of faith . . . truly committed to making America great again through principles that honor God rather than defy Him” (Stephen Strang).
• “In the midst of . . . despair, came November the 8th, 2016. It was on that day . . . that God declared that the people, not the pollsters, were gonna choose the next president of the United States. And they chose Donald Trump” (Robert Jeffress).
• “We thank God every day that He gave us a leader like President Trump” (Robert Jeffress).14
Tags
Who is online
144 visitors
How is Trump able to convince these Christian leaders that he is worthy of their support? Mostly by paying attention to them, inviting them to Trump Tower, and indulging their need to be listened to in an increasingly post-Christian culture. It is truly remarkable that they have been taken in by Trump’s vague and barely comprehensible statements about his “faith,” such as “I’ve always been spiritual,” “belief is very important,” and “I’m going to do a great job for religion.” Honestly, Hitler was better at pretending to be a Christian.
Read the entire letter here .
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
I saw a documentary about Pastor Bonhoeffer on Prime Video. He really was a brave man and stuck to his values.
Once again proving they are faux christians, christians in name only.
[deleted]
Stick to the topic.
I did. I told you why people supported Trump and it was without some wild Christian conspiracy - it is because half of the electorate thinks Hiliary is an asshole. It was that simple but your ilk's continual barrage just makes Trumpers dig in deeper.
[deleted]
Stick to the topic.
Perhaps even consider reading the article and responding with conversation points.
Wouldn't that be a breath of fresh air?
Don't ignore the political trinity: God, family, and country. An attack on any one of the three is an attack on all.
Orthodox Christians ignore the protestant roots of the American political trinity at their peril. Conflating God with orthodox church authority results in inquisitorial excess, as history shows. The first provided example gives the explanation. “With National Socialism an epoch in German history has begun that is at least as decisive for the German people, as for example the epoch of Martin Luther.” The meaning of that example statement is a repudiation of orthodoxy.
Today's orthodoxy is more commonly thought of as conventional wisdom or the status quo. The election of Donald Trump was a repudiation of an orthodoxy that increasingly undermines and attacks the American political trinity. It was public dissatisfaction with orthodoxy that allowed Adolf Hitler to obtain power. The public had thrown out orthodoxy and wasn't going back. The political establishment chose to protect orthodoxy and ignored the public dissatisfaction with that orthodoxy. What Adolf Hitler did with that public dissatisfaction was Adolf Hitler's choice.
What the history of Germany shows is that when the public becomes dissatisfied with the orthodoxy of conventional wisdom and the status quo, a crazed demagogue promising to change the status quo is preferable to a defender of the status quo. And Adolf Hitler did change the status quo.
The American public is questioning the modern orthodoxy's ability to defend the American political trinity of God, family, and country. If the political establishment continues to protect modern orthodoxy then the risk is that the public will give an Adolf Hitler power. The more the political establishment ignores public dissatisfaction with the status quo, the more likely an Adolf Hitler becomes.
Well said Nerm.
An Open Letter to Christians Who Love Bonhoeffer but (Still) Support Trump
Above is a link to the letter, below is the last paragraph:
If none of the candidates in an election meets your standard, does it matter whose name you write in? I recently browsed through the official results of Alabama’s special Senate election. Given the highly Christian populace of the state, I was surprised that among the 22,852 write-in votes—which included votes for Mickey Mouse, Mel Brooks, and Gus Malzahn (Auburn’s football coach)—Bonhoeffer’s name did not appear even once. One certainly makes a statement by writing in names like Beyoncé, Bugs Bunny, or Buffett (Jimmy and Warren both received multiple votes), but imagine the statement a Christian voter could make by writing in “Bonhoeffer.” So the next time you are presented with a slate of candidates, consider each one on his or her merits. If you find that you cannot—as a Christian and a responsible citizen—vote for any of them, write in “Bonhoeffer.” That will be a Bonhoeffer moment you can feel good about.