Former staffer Tara Reade says Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993. Here's what we know.
Category: News & Politics
Via: kdmichigan • 4 years ago • 42 commentsBy: Jeanine Santucci, USA TODAY (MSN)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
WASHINGTON — It's been about a month since Tara Reade, a former staffer to Joe Biden when he served in the Senate, publicly aired her allegation of sexual assault against the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
Reade claims that Biden assaulted her in the Capitol building in 1993, when she worked as an aide. Biden's campaign has denied the assault took place and encouraged the press to investigate, though the candidate has yet to react publicly to Reade's allegation.
Meanwhile, additional people who say they were told about the alleged assault around that time have come forward to corroborate Reade's story. On Monday, Business Insider reported that a former neighbor of Reade's from the 1990s and a former coworker in a California state senator's office recalled Reade describing parts of her account.
Tara Reade's claim: Former Senate staffer accuses Joe Biden of sexual assault
The assault allegation now lingers as Biden all but certainly claims the nomination and picks up endorsements from major figures like former President Barack Obama, 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, and his biggest competitor in the 2020 race, Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Here's what we know about it so far:
Who is Tara Reade?
Tara Reade worked for Biden for about eight months in 1992 and 1993 as an assistant, which included supervising interns, according to reporting by The New York Times. It was in the spring of '93 that Reade says Biden assaulted her.
After Reade says she complained to supervisors about harassment, but not assault, she had her responsibilities scaled back as a result until she was eventually told to find a new job. In interviews with the Associated Press and The New York Times, Reade was inconsistent in naming the supervisor who told her to move on. Former Biden staffers in supervising roles at the time interviewed by news outlets say they don't recall a report of that nature ever being filed or discussing it with her.
"I never once witnessed, or heard of, or received, any reports of inappropriate conduct, period — not from Ms. Reade, not from anyone," Biden's former executive assistant Marianne Baker told AP in a statement through his campaign.
Reade is now a single mother who changed her name after fleeing an abusive marriage in the late 1990s, the Times reported. She has since worked as an advocate for domestic violence survivors and for animal rescue organizations.
What are the allegations?
A year ago, Reade spoke to media about claims Biden had inappropriately touched her while she worked for him in the Senate, as part of a group of eight women who said Biden had a habit of inappropriate physical displays of affection. At the time, Reade didn't mention the assault and Biden said he'd be "more mindful."
But last month, Reade said first on "The Katie Halper Show" and in subsequent media interviews that while she was tasked with delivering a gym bag to the former senator, Biden pinned her against a wall and digitally penetrated her without her consent in the basement of a Capitol Hill office.
"He was whispering to me and trying to kiss me at the same time, and he was saying, 'Do you want to go somewhere else?'" Reade told AP. "I remember wanting to say stop, but I don't know if I said it out loud or if I just thought it. I was kind of frozen up."
When she pulled away, Reade says, Biden looked surprised and said, "Come on, man, I heard you liked me."
Reade said she wasn't aware of any witnesses to the incident but that she filed a report in the Senate and complained to supervisors. She claims she was retaliated against, but former Biden employees dispute that.
What is Biden's side of the story?
Biden's campaign has expressly denied he assaulted Reade and pointed to his work "changing the culture and the laws around violence against women."
"He firmly believes that women have a right to be heard — and heard respectfully. Such claims should also be diligently reviewed by an independent press. What is clear about this claim: It is untrue. This absolutely did not happen," said deputy campaign manager and communications director Kate Bedingfield in a statement to AP.
The campaign did not provide additional comments in light of the most recent reporting on Reade's claim. The candidate himself has not yet spoken publicly about Reade.
Reade has lambasted members of the news media for not asking Biden to address her claim during television interviews, making comparisons to the way the public reacted to allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation proceedings in 2018.
"I guess my question is, if this were Donald Trump, would they treat it the same way? If this were Brett Kavanaugh, did they treat it the same way?" Reade said to Fox News. "In other words, it's politics and political agenda playing a role in objective reporting and asking the question."
Is there any evidence to support Reade's accusation?
Reade doesn't recall anyone witnessing the alleged incident, but multiple people say they remember her describing it to them well before she told her story publicly. An anonymous friend and her brother told news outlets earlier this month that she had told them about a claim against Biden. This week two additional people now say they remembered conversations with Reade about it.
A former neighbor in the mid-1990s, Lynda LaCasse, says she is a Democrat who intends to vote for Biden, but decided to speak out about her recollection of Reade's story because she believed it when she first heard it.
"This happened, and I know it did because I remember talking about it," LaCasse told Business Insider.
Lorraine Sanchez, who worked with Reade between 1994 and 1996 for a state senator, said Reade told her about being sexually harassed by "her former boss while she was in D.C. and as a result of her voicing her concerns to her supervisors, she was let go, fired." Sanchez did not remember if Reade specifically named Biden.
Additionally, Reade says she told her mother about what happened, but she died a few years ago. Reade recalled that her mother had called in to "Larry King Live" to ask for advice about the treatment her daughter received in 1993. Over the weekend, a clip of what Reade says is her mother's voice on the line with Larry King was unearthed by The Intercept.
The woman on the call told King that her daughter had just left Washington, "after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him."
Report: Biden accuser spoke to neighbor of alleged assault
As for the report Reade says she filed when she worked for Biden, media investigations haven't confirmed its existence. Reade believes it may be within the collection of records from Biden's Senate days that are housed at the University of Delaware, closed for viewing until two years after he retires from public life. She has called on the former vice president to allow access to the records.
Earlier this month Reade filed a police report saying she was assaulted in 1993, without naming Biden, in order to give herself safety from threats she has received.
"I also wanted to make it clear that I would be willing to go under oath or cooperate with any law enforcement regarding it, because it did happen," she told Insider, which reported the investigation has now been "moved to an inactive status," unsurprising to Reade.
Why now?
Reade's story has been shared by figures on the right and left alike, with many calling for Biden to drop out of the race. She had supported Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders for president before they both suspended their campaigns, she told AP. But she says her motives for coming forward aren't political.
Reade didn't share her story publicly while Biden was previously in the White House because, she told the Intercept's Ryan Grim, she didn't want the story to impact her then-teenage daughter, and because she liked Obama. Additionally, she said she didn't know how to come forward in a pre-#MeToo era.
Reade told AP she didn't reveal the alleged assault last year when discussing the claim about inappropriate touching because she was afraid of the repercussions.
"I'd like to be heard in a fair and objective way," she told Insider. "And I'd also like to hear Joe Biden's response, which has not happened. My hope is that the conversation will move forward and we will examine how I was treated when I came forward, and really look at the fact that, like domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual harassment is not a partisan issue. It is an equal-opportunity offender."
Contributing: The Associated Press
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Former staffer Tara Reade says Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993. Here's what we know.
Read More Microsoft may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this article.
Tags
Who is online
635 visitors
Trump is not the subject. TDS sufferers need to find a different way to defend your clown.
I find it shameful that the left wing media doesn't hold groping Joe to task on this.
[deleted]
Shameful, but completely expected. Why we call them "news media" anymore is beyond me. We should call them propaganda outlets. What's the point of calling it "news" when you can't trust a damned thing they say?
Unfortunately it is all news. I had to quit watching the world news after our local news, Nora O'donnel makes me want to puke, the way she speaks is so annoying and she couldn't hide her political bias if you covered her with a sheet.
So an allegation is made 27 YEARS after the fact? No witnesses, no evidence. This is just a "he said she said" sort of thing.
Funny, I don't recall you taking the same stance on Kavanaugh.
I don't recall you taking the same stance on Kavanaugh
Apparently, allegations about the conduct of a United States Senator from 27 years ago are irrelevant.
But allegations from 36 years ago about a teenager are earth shattering news that the media must fixate on 24/7
Do tell, what was my stance?
I'm sorry, but what part of "I don't recall you taking the same stance on Kavanaugh" don't you get?
I didn't say you took any stance; I stated I don't recall you taking the same stance.
So, what was your stance on Kavanaugh and the accusations made against him?
If you did take the same stance, good for you!!!!!!!!
If you didn't, then my statement is correct (it really is correct either way).
Then your post is pointless and and off topic as it has nothing to do with this one. Kavanaugh is not the topic.
If the author of the article declares it is off-topic, then it is.
They have not.
But hey, way to avoid answering any questions!
Perhaps I was right in my memory of you not feeling the same way about Kavanaugh.
[deleted]
The topic of the article is about Biden, not Kavanaugh. So yes, Kavanaugh is off topic. That's quite obvious. And your question is irrelevant.
[deleted]
[deleted]
With each post, you make it clearer you hold a double standard for Kavanaugh and Biden.
Doesn't matter that you outright refuse to answer a simple question; sometimes a non-answer IS an answer.
[deleted]
So what happened to the #MeToo? I understand the TDS sufferers like to turn a blind eye to groping Joe, but gee it isn't the 1st accusation right? I mean it's like he is almost showing a pattern.
At least she can recite a time a place and a date unlike Ford that all the left was claiming must be believed and Democrats actually had to drag her to Washington to hear her testimony. The fact that you don't see the hypocrisy speaks volumes.
Ask a relevant question that's actually worthy of an answer, and you might get one. Since Kavanaugh isn't the topic, your question is irrelevant.
You're veering off topic [deleted]
[deleted]
What a difference a mere two years makes for #MeToo and left-wing media.
2018 (Kavanaugh): Women must be believed.
2020 (Biden): Women should be heard and listened to. No mention of believing a woman from Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Stacey Abrams, et al.
One more thing - Biden has given many interviews to left-wing media since Reade's allegations came to light. Why haven't interviewers ever directly asked him about these charges?
There appears to be a blatant double standard.
I was just waiting for Anderson 'fake news' Cooper to hit him with that hardball question....
Joe Biden supposed to hold a virtual Townhall, this should at least protect the woman and children from his groping hands.
His special guest was none other than Hillary Clinton, the champion of supporting male sexual predators. As has become typical, he wasn't asked a single question about Tara Reade at this "women's town hall".
They have to keep lobbing softballs at Joe.
Safer for him and Democrats that way.
I'm sure Hillary gave him lessons about how to bully victims of sexual assault into signing NDAs. It was her signal contribution to her husband's political campaign.
At any given time here, there are ALWAYS Trump articles to comment on.
Trump is wholly unrelated to any accusations made against Biden by a woman.
They need to give advanced warnings to Jill and then roll the ball on the floor in slo-mo so old Joe doesn't think it's a game of kickball.
Seems like Trump would be exactly the guy Joe Biden should ask for advice concerning these sordid accusations.
Why? Joe need some pointers or something?
Trump is not the subject as I specified. Now you have opened up a avenue for the TDS sufferers to bitch about Trump. unfortunately I can't moderate my seeds otherwise I would have tagged your comment.
Thanks for respecting my seed, I know Tex mentioned President Trump so that is a opening for the Trump sufferers to jump in.
No that is your chance to flag Tex for being off topic from at least 3.1.4 and 3.1.6.
I'm sure the comments would have been removed per your request through flagging if available
or by asking through chat which you have done before.
My apologies for jumping in unaware of the "restrictions".
Well, then you would have to remove post 3.1.3, 3.15, and 3.1.8, since they all mention Trump.
"Meta comments (comments about the site or its members) are always off-topic."
And if KD decides to flag me for it, I'm good with that, too.
Sorry, KD!
KD,
You can use your flags and we will respond. Just chose off-topic by author. And meta is always off topic. Note, you can not selectively flag and allow some Trump comments and not others.
Whatever, flag them all, I don't care. I cannot ticket anything in a thread I participated in,
so someone else will come along and clean it up eventually.
It's up to KD at this point.
It seemed like you were accusing me of bringing Trump into the conversation.
Or maybe it just seemed that way to me because you ignored who brought Trump into it.
No, if anyone accused anyone, KDM blamed you
probably because he didn't see it in 3.1.3 either.
I honestly did not see it in Rtb's comment - it wasn't capitalized. I had to look twice.
How was the re-opening today?
Really no different since the restrictions were put in place. We had been doing only to-go orders either through customer curbside pick-up or third-party deliveries and had been growing sales. Today was the first day, and we are restricted to 25% capacity, which meant we could only seat 10 tables. I opened today and only had 5 tables come in to eat until I left at 5. But to-go business remained brisk. Our customer base tends to be older, so I think that eat-in will be slow until a return to full capacity.
Sure wish I could get a haircut, though! Another two weeks and I'll look pretty dang shaggy!
Third record day for new cases in Dallas & Tarrant.
Seems to be going the wrong way.
Best of luck with the to-go and the deliveries.
I cut my own hair.
Sometimes the results are 'interesting' but I have all the time in the world to correct or just go shorter.
and shorter. lol
Stay masked. Stay safe.