Donald Trump Is Now 'America's No. 1 Traitor,' Says Veterans Group
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Lee Moran HuffPost July 4, 2020, 5:04 AM
Donald Trump has taken over from Benedict Arnold as "America's number one traitor," according to a group of veterans seeking to vote the president out of office this November.
"No one has betrayed those in uniform like Donald Trump," said the voiceover in the latest ad released by the progressive PAC VoteVets on Friday.
The 65-second spot references Trump's siding with Russia's President Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence on Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and his dismissal of reports that U.S. officials knew Russia allegedly paid Taliban members to kill American troops.
"This July Fourth, Benedict Arnold can step aside, because Benedict Donald is America's number one traitor," the voiceover concluded.
This July 4th, there is a new name synonymous with traitor. Move over Benedict Arnold. Meet...#BenedictDonald#TRE45ONpic.twitter.com/zH0TgMf0Rb
— VoteVets (@votevets) July 3, 2020
The #BenedictDonald and #TRE45ON hashtags trended on Twitter as the ad was viewed more than 2 million times in its first 12 hours online.
VoteVets last month tore into Trump over the Russian bounty reports with this scathing video:
It also slammed Trump in May over what it described as "the most inappropriate" Memorial Day comment that a president has ever made:
This is the most inappropriate #MemorialDay comment that a @POTUS has ever made. Self-promotion on a day to remember the fallen, and wishing those remembering their deceased loved ones a "happy" holiday is appalling. #CadetBoneSpurspic.twitter.com/kRse4dnwiu
— VoteVets (@votevets) May 28, 2018
This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.
Tags
Who is online
458 visitors
Trump is less popular than anal warts with veterans!
released by the progressive PAC VoteVets on Friday.
Tells all we need to know.
Ya think?
2020 PAC Contribution Data
Presidential
Total to Democrats: $10,000
Total to Republicans: $0
House
Total to Democrats: $296,933
Total to Republicans: $0
Senate
Total to Democrats: $80,000
Total to Republicans: $0
But, MBFC claims ...
So what if they have a moderate to liberal bias? Does that make them wrong? Or are you of the opinion that every one who ever wore a uniform has to be conservative?
It certainly sounds like this group of veterans has solid American values. You would expect them to donate to the Party of Treason or the Traitor in Chief? I don't think so.
So they're a liberal veterans group. Since their vets, they have put their life on the line for this country and swore an oath to protect and defend his nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They certainly can choose to be liberal if they want to, they have paid their dues.
Are you a vet Jasper? If you are you can make the same choice. Easy Peasy
Nativos americanos y veteranos latinos para Biden / Harris
Not quite all Native Americans and Latinos - definitely not all.
Better brush up on your Spanish, I didn't say all. I know that there are some like you.
As you well know, I don't like either of them - and there are quite a number of folks in my neck of the woods who have the same feelings. And, IF they were the only choices, I'd exercise my Constitutional right of not voting.
There are a "few" non-Dem/non-Repubs who are interesting, but just haven't found enough information on them - yet.
ps - Entiendo muy bien el español, recuerde, mi esposa, mi hija, su abuela y mi suegra son todas de Venezuela, por lo que el inglés es un idioma muy olvidado en nuestra casa.
Gracias y buenos noches.
Truth is truth. It ain't a little truth or a big truth or even a tiny bit 'pregnant,' it's simply fact no matter the background.
Funny it seems that many of your comments are supportive of Trump or attacking dems/liberals.
If what you say is correct then you better prepare to not vote, since anything other than the two candidates is a waste of a vote.
I'm well aware that your wife etc are from Venezuela. So you should know that I didn't say ALL.
Baamaapii
Actually, no - IMHO, any vote for either of the two is a wasted vote. Neither is the leader we NEED and I haven't seen anyone in either party who fits that bill right now.
I, as I have explained to you a couple of times, approve/support programs that are beneficial to the people, regardless of which party proposes/enacts them. Hence, I "may" like some of the things this administration (not the President) has done/is doing and, on the flip side, there "may" be some things they are doing that I don't like. Do the same for the Dem Congressional folks. Did the same with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush. If it's good - OK; it it ain't - it sux.
I "try" not to be as obviously biased as many on NT are - but, as stated before, politics in today's world suck as they are no longer for the constituents, but for the office holders and their brethren. Both parties suck - the vast majority of their leaders suck - we, the People, need to seriously clean house - very deeply and thoroughly.
But, will we??? Kinda doubt it during my remaining 20 - 40 years.
When you describe the ''people'' you should be aware that has a couple of meanings. For me, there is ''The People'' and the vast majority of items proposed by the right for ''The People'' are for shit. So I'm much more supportive of the left and their dealings with ''The People'' If need be we can take both parties' platform for ''The People'' and debate them.
We can start with Bears Ears and work our way through Tongass, Alaska Wildlife Sanctuary, Pepple Mine, DAPL, sovereignty, removing Indians lands from trust status. One of the best is what the administration has done to the Mashpee Wampanoag.
Or how the ''border wall'' is being built right on Native land without their permission. Oh yeah, there is that old sovereignty thing again.
Reality should tell you there won't be a 3rd party or a 3rd party candidate that will ever get over 5% of the vote. It is a waste of a vote.
Biizitaagoziwin inwewin adbadad anishinaawin.
Maybe your good with the insults, I'm not.
The old both parties suck 'thing' again. So just sat it out? (And let that other guy win.) Riggggggght. /s.
We ain't believing it. We vote. You sit it out, OKAAAAAYYYYY.
One snack * and a "Hey Now!" to that head-fake that just waddled by.
Not quite sure just where you see an insult - 'cause none have been addressed at you.
Yes, we have discussed the above issues, including the border wall. Those are parts of the administration I have issues with. In fact, so far this administration has done jack shyte for Native Americans. I'm really concerned, in a strange way, about what "his" Native American history month proclamation is gonna say - something like - "Hey ya'll, it it weren't for the rich white people, there would be no Native Americans" or some other horse shyte like that.
Obama and Clinton did actually work with and for the Native Americans. Daddy Bush did a little, little Bush did nuthin'. I don't see either Trump nor Biden changing the Washington concept of Tribal relationships. Example - why isn't Diane Humetewa on his "short" list? Hell, she's not even in consideration 'cause she ain't done nuthin for buzinesses/industry/economical growth. But, then again, we're in the SW and we ain't got much power, ya know? Oh, and she's "Indian" - they ain't too smart - well, they beat me in Atlantic City, but that was luck.
Kavika - I have never nor will I ever "insult" you. We've been through too much together to carry that type of banter - especially among friends.
That comment was directed at Trump not you.
Biizitaagoziwin inwewin adbadad anishinaawin translates to roughly ''his insulting Indian people''.
All you have to do is check out what he did/said last year.
"HuffPost"?????????
BBBBBRRRRUUUUUHHHHHHAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAA.
A purely biased site - " It has been described as mostly liberal-leaning - HuffPost regularly appended an editor's note to the end of stories about candidate Donald Trump , reading: "Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims—1.6 billion members of an entire religion—from entering the U.S." -
You mean THAT totally unbiased HuffPost????
BS
Rudy is one also.
Unfortunately, some still support him.
And yet another group i had never heard of , thx jasper for the link showing what they stand for.
Yeah....Jasper has no bias
They stand for solid American values. Is there a problem with that?
No problem , just stated never heard of them.
anyone have a different link they want me to read to find out more about them? or was the one sufficient and truthfully described that particular group?
I never did either. There certainly are a lot of political groups. I'm just looking at who is online. Mark we may be better off doing our own investigating.
Oh, here:
"Notes: VoteVets.org is organized as a non-partisan political action committee (PAC) and non-profit 501(c)(4) status in the United States. Although a nonpartisan organization, it has been described as “closely aligned with Congressional Democrats,” and “liberal” in news stories. In a June 2011 press release, the organization specifically identified itself as the “largest progressive group of veterans in America.” (D. Van Zandt 2/4/2017)
Got it. Have you looked at their website, votevets.org? It contains a lot of information.
I just visited their website and there is a huge picture of Rachel Maddow?
I had to step away! It got to me. A little Ginger Ale seems to help settle my stomach.
well im not a progressive by any definition , and im not a democrat , or what passes for one now days, so likely would not be something i am interested in .
You're kind of an independent?
Are you a Veteran?
yes 10 years, military connected disabled and non compensable .
Thank you for your service.
What do you think of Vets like these? I know all are entitled to their opinion, but in the military it would be a minority opinion, correct?
The people being supported here are all democrats.
i have been out almost 30 years now , things change , i really have no opinion on how other vets think or what their opinions are. to me the only opinion that matters in making the choices on who to vote for is my own , and some dont seem to like that or the fact that i have opinions that cross the entire political spectrum dependent on the issue at hand.
Yes, I've noticed that you are not an ideologue. As a matter of fact you may be one of our few independents. As always, it's been nice talking with you.
Have a good night, sir.
Good for you. Seriously.
Do you disparage other vets, or other Americans, just because they are Democrats, as some would like you to do, even though, as you have stated, you are not a Democrat? I don't think you probably do.
just did. and i doubt i fit with that org.
Understood. If you ever happen to develop an opinion that coincides with an issue they support, at least you now know who they are.
LMAO, some could say i do that to everyone , im an equal opertunity disparager. status of any kind means nothing to me .
i have a life time of experiences ( yes i would love to meet the little oriental guy at the herring run on the cape , when my moms water broke , and they rushed her away said i hope the child grows up to live in interesting times I would punch that guy right in the mouth) and my opinions are formed from those experiences as well as a very early interest in history , when i was younger thats all i was about , learning what came before.
Political party means nothing to me except as an identifier, there ARE some , principles dems hold i can get behind and some Rep i can , and both have principles i can not , nor will i ever get behind and to attempt to do so is what my grandfather told me is what is called a "fools errand". I belong to no party , nor will i belong to any party. I like the fact i can vote ALA carte across party lines for those i think best suit the job i think they should be doing if that is my choice.
I wonder if their leanings have something to do with justice, decency, dignity, and the pointed fact that our mutually shared government populated military has a structure that tells young men and women of each generation that honor and service can be deeply hampered by competing "tribal" interests? That men and women asked to face death should have the confidence that "home" will do fine and not tear itself into component parts while they are 'away'?
Military men and women are taught to 'jell' together into a well-oiled machine. It is the psychology of being in a pressure cooker and watching the best 'cream' rise to the occasion. The best bond together spiritually (for life). It changes millions upon millions for a lifetime.
Many Trump republicans and conservatives have no honor. Vote for your health back home - service-members!
You don't know how correct you are. We had to learn to work together and dismiss things like party politics, skin color, religion, and other personal beliefs or we wouldn't have gotten a damn thing done. I never served in combat but I imagine you don't particularly care what your buddy's politics are as long as he's watching your six and you are watching his.
And yet here we are with this "flintstonian-looking" fool of a president going around verbally carving the country into regions, and tribes versus a more perfect union. Brother against brother, sister against sister, mother against son, father against daughter.
And there sits Donald Trump atop the big steaming pile of 'f-ed" up 'Merica, which is right where he wants it to be, so he can claim he fixed it! People need to wake the "F" up. We're being played by a minority of self-deluded selfish men and women in charge of the levers of power. Trump and some of his supporters know little and obviously are not interested in bonding with their fellow Americans. They are lying to us openly now. Listen up! Trump and some of his surrogates are OPENLY lying to us, and Donald has not even started that wannabe second four years term!
As the military bonds recruited men and women into one by putting them through a crucible, training, conflicts, battles, and wars, Donald Trump is attempting to switch this great nation into bonding. . . .with himself (alone) at its head. Look deeper my fellow Americans. You are being masterfully manipulated.
Lastly, I will drop this in your spirits. It is my opinion, that Donald Trump has asked nation-presidents for life for their a roadmaps; "how-to" guides to accomplishing the same here in the greatest democracy ever on Earth.
Vote Vets supports veterans for public office.
These are the vets that they are supporting this election cycle. Don't like it, take it up with Vote Vets or the vets themselves.
Federal Offices
U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth
U.S. Senate – Illinois
U.S. Senator Gary Peters
U.S. Senate – Michigan
U.S. Senator Jack Reed
U.S. Senate – Rhode Island
U.S. Senator Tom Carper
U.S. Senate – Delaware
Congressman Anthony Brown
U.S. House – Maryland 4
Congressman Salud Carbajal
U.S. House – California 24
Congressman Ruben Gallego
U.S. House – Arizona 7
Congressman Ted Lieu
U.S. House – California 33
Congressman Seth Moulton
U.S. House – Massachusetts 6
Congressman Jimmy Panetta
U.S. House – California 20
Congressman Conor Lamb
U.S. House – Pennsylvania 18
Congressman Gil Cisneros
U.S. House – California 39
Congressman Jason Crow
U.S. House – Colorado 6
Congressman Jared Golden
U.S. House – Maine 2
Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan
U.S. House – Pennsylvania 6
Congresswoman Elaine Luria
U.S. House – Virginia 2
Congressman Max Rose
U.S. House – New York 11
Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill
U.S. House – New Jersey 11
MJ Hegar for Senate
U.S. Senate – Texas
Mark Kelly for Senate
U.S. Senate – Arizona
Gina Ortiz Jones for Congress
U.S. House – Texas 23
Cal Cunningham for Senate
U.S. Senate – North Carolina
Amy McGrath for Senate
U.S. Senate – Kentucky
Jackie Gordon for Congress
U.S. House – New York 2
Dan Feehan for Congress
U.S. House – Minnesota 1
Moe Davis for Congress
U.S. House – North Carolina 11
Pam Keith for Congress
U.S. House – Florida 18
Josh Hicks for Congress
U.S. House – Kentucky 6
Jake Auchincloss for Congress
U.S. House – Massachusetts 4
Kai Kahele for Congress
U.S. House – Hawaii 2
Hillary O'Connor Mueri for Congress
U.S. House – Ohio 14
Adrian Perkins for Senate
U.S. Senate – Louisiana
Kim Mangone for Congress
U.S. House – California 23
Phil Ehr for Congress
U.S. House – Florida 1
State Offices
Governor John Bel Edwards
Governor – Louisiana
Governor Tim Walz
Governor – Minnesota
Non-Veterans We Support
Congressman Andy Kim
Non-Veteran – New Jersey 3
Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin
Non-Veteran – Michigan 8
Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger
Non-Veteran – Virginia 7
This so obviously dumb to anyone with at least a 5th grade education in American History. Keep this nonsense up and you'll reelect him. The more extreme and ridiculous the attacks on him are, the more sympathy he gets from voters.
i am almost to the point of what will be worse---having Biden as President or listening to crap for 4 more years?
Joe Biden won't oppress Trump supporter privileges and rights, unless the aforementioned people claim rights belonging to others! So you can "rejoice."
No brainer for me , all i have to do is turn off my hearing aides like i did the last 2 years i was married.
Source:
ha ha!
good one!
you seem to have missed the point of my post.
I never claimed Biden would oppress anyone.
sounds like a strawman argument to me.
Was that meant for me or someone else? and if meant for me , what the flying finger fuck does it have to do with me?
It goes back to something we shared together several days ago (on race and ethnicity). Then you were away. So now you're back and I am kindly sharing a thought. (Smile.) As for the "flying fucks" - nope.
[deleted]
[deleted]
more like several WEEKS ago and we havent spoken since that i recall. so i will round file it .
removed for context
removed for context
Yeah. I thought you would ignore it. Check.
Whatever do you mean Tacos!, voters like who exactly?
The article picture is interesting. So "clean." Who taught Donald how to properly salute?
so now we are reduced to criticizing our President over how he salutes, for Pete's sake?
time.com/3425019/obamas-tea-cup-salute-causes-a-storm
Can you imagine that we were reduced by the Republicans to criticizing our President over a salute, for Pete's sake?
if there is any problem with what others gave said. I suggest you take it up with them.
I'm not in the business of assigning words people don't actually say to them, and I don't take credit or blame for what others say.
Reduced, did you say? Trump did not learn to salute during his military service and yet so 'crisp.'
And yet you chime in so often. . . . Just sayin' We can take it up with "chimers." Chimers are handy. (Chuckles.)
yes, It is right there in my post. Here, I'll repost it for you:
Being in the military isn't a prerequisite for learning to salute, but I am so happy you like how our President does it!
Interesting, in a train-wreck-like kind of way.
I would ask what you mean, but what would be the point?
It is a crisp salute. Gotta love a crisp salute. The rest of the image is lost on me. I can not muster respect for liars, cheaters, and thieves.
It IS!!
I love it too, and am very happy that you do!
Pretty snappy salute, eh?
That tends to happen when people ask open questions on a forum meant for discussion.
Perhaps a private question would be better suited if "chiming in" is not welcomed?
Yes. I will honor the salute. I will let you do your best to be indulgent in anything more nuanced. Moving on. . . .
Fantastic!
Thanks for "allowing" me to do what I want.
What is that line?
oh, yeah!
"You're not the boss of me!"
Sure. Whatever that means.
what exact part needs to be clarified?
maybe I can help