Trump keeps messing up the name of new US missiles in the works
Category: News & Politics
Via: john-russell • 4 years ago • 13 commentsBy: Ryan Pickrell (Business Insider)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Amid recent attacks on his Democratic opponent for verbal gaffes, President Donald Trump has repeatedly messed up the name of a type of weapon the US is developing.
At three separate political events in just four days, Trump referred to "hypersonic" weapons as "hydrosonic" missiles, confusing a missile with a toothbrush.
Trump sometimes refers to the "hydrosonic missile" as the "super duper missile," a new weapon about which he has repeatedly provided conflicting information.
In recent days, President Donald Trump has repeatedly screwed up the name of a type of missile the US is currently working to develop, confusing it with a toothbrush.
"We have the hydrosonic missiles you used to hear about," Trump said in Ocala, Florida, last Friday. "We now have hydrosonic missiles. We have the greatest military ever."
In Muskegon, Michigan, on Saturday, Trump touted what he calls the "super duper missile." (In September, he said he calls them "super duper missiles" because that is easier to understand than "hydrosonic.")
"They go very fast. Hydrosonic," he said. "Super dupers. They go five to seven times faster than the fastest missile in the world. They go so fast you can't do anything."
In Prescott, Arizona, on Monday, he claimed that the US is the envy of both Russia and China.
"We have hydrosonic missiles," the president said, telling a crowd that "they go seven times faster than a normal missile. We have the best hydrosonic in the world."
'Hypersonic missiles'
A common hypersonic glide body launches during a flight test at Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii, March 19, 2020. US Navy
Trump appears to be talking about hypersonic missiles, but he keeps confusing the name with that of a kind of electric toothbrush made by Curaprox, the top hits if you Google "hydrosonic." These mistakes come as Trump has repeatedly mocked his Democratic opponent Joe Biden for various verbal slips.
He first boasted about the "super duper missile" in May. Then in June, the president mentioned the weapon several times, referring to it as a "hypersonic missile," "super duper," and "hydrosonic missile" at different events. Each time, he claimed that the weapon was "17 times faster" than the fastest missile in the world.
In July, a senior defense official told CNN that Trump's "super duper missile" is a reference to the hypersonic glide body that the Pentagon successfully tested in March. The glide body, which will be used to develop future hypersonic weaponry, flew at around 17 times the speed of sound, which is very different from being 17 times faster than the fastest missile.
Trump has since changed the speed to five to seven times that of a "normal missile," perhaps a reference to slower cruise missiles rather than ballistic missiles, which can hit speeds as high as Mach 23.
While the president claims that the US now has hypersonic missiles, the US has not yet fielded one. The Air Force has made progress on the AGM-183 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon, and the Army and Navy are currently working together to develop hypersonic missiles that could be fielded in a few years.
And, despite Trump's emphasis on their speed, hypersonic missiles are not a serious threat simply because of how fast they can fly. These weapons have unpredictable flight paths, so they are very difficult for traditional air- and missile-defense systems to intercept.
The inability to defend against them is one reason hypersonic missiles are a key area of competition among the three great powers. The US is not alone in its development of hypersonic weapons. Both Russia and China are developing their own hypersonic weapons, which are in various stages of testing and fielding.
As for the president's oft-touted "hydrosonic missile," Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert with the Federation for American Scientists, told Insider that "it only exists inside Trump's head."
Newsletter Sign up for a daily selection of our best stories daily based on your reading preferences. LoadingSomething is loading. 
Email address By clicking 'Sign up', you agree to receive marketing emails from Business Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
SEE ALSO:Trump says the US nuclear arsenal is now 'tippy top' thanks to him, but nuke experts say he's out of touch with reality
NOW WATCH: This breakthrough could make it much cheaper to send aircraft into space
More:Donald TrumpHypersonic missiles Close iconTwo crossed lines that form an 'X'. It indicates a way to close an interaction, or dismiss a notification.
Tags
Who is online
451 visitors
Who is Trump scaring with his staggering incompetence? The enemy, or us ?
Mostly you, it appears.
You are happy that the president cannot properly articulate his wordage about our nuclear weapons arsenal ?
I'm shocked. I thought you were patriotic. Having a buffoon represent our country is no reassuring thought.
He is as patriotic as a bowl of borscht.
Do yourself a favor and look up how the designation SR-71 Blackbird came about and how President Johnson was involved. Similar precedent here.
Normally I like history but what someone said 50 years ago is irrelevant to Trump's present day buffoonery.
Nice deflection JR but my statement is still relevant.
Who the hell cares what they are called? They all go boom with the same destructive properties.
You approve of the president of the United States being a provable idiot ?
At least he's not running for the Senate...
Why? A lot of younger voters today have never even heard of LBJ. But they will see Trump mangle the English language on You Tube or twitter. The only question is what percentage of the American people care that their president is a constant embarrassment to this country.
A lot of younger voters don't know a hell of a lot of shit. Look at the interviews on campuses, sponsored by right or left leaners, that reveal their inherent "Don't give a shit, what's in it for me" and the old spoonfed "but he's going to" dismissal of history and no clue as to why they vote for whom they vote for.
Add to that that they get their "news" from social media for the most part, they have to be a confused lot. And the only reason they would watch on YouTube would be because someone suggested (read TOLD) them to.
You seem to put a lot of stock in the fact that they are (and more times than not not at all but say they are) paying attention and thinking critically for themselves.
It seems obvious to me that a hydrosonic would be super-duper.