The Lincoln Project: "Seriously"


Category:  News & Politics

By:  krishna  •  3 weeks ago  •  14 comments

The Lincoln Project: "Seriously"


jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
1  author  Krishna    3 weeks ago

Dear Donald;

We at the Lincoln Project just want to say "Its OK".

Seriously, we know your did your best.:-)

1.1  author  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @1    3 weeks ago

But as far as the being President thing, it isn't for everyone.

Its the hardest job in the world.

And it takes a lot of qualities ...that you just don't have.

Like compassion, human decency . . . and basic reading skills! 

Trout Giggles
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Krishna @1    3 weeks ago

He did not! He didn't even try!

2  author  Krishna    3 weeks ago

. . .. . .  it doesn't matter

Because losing doesn't automatically mean"a loser".

Or failure.

Or a National Disgrace!

(To really understand what these phrases are about, you have to watch the video and see the accompanying pictures for each phrase).

Bob Nelson
2.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Krishna @2    3 weeks ago

Not automatically. But it this case... certainly 

Hal A. Lujah
3  Hal A. Lujah    3 weeks ago

Will they teach about Trump in history textbooks of the future?  It would be so much easier to just skip over that four years of embarrassment and offer it as an elective for those with a strong stomach.

Bob Nelson
3.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3    3 weeks ago

The winners write the history books. We won't know who wins for a long time. 

The Dems must win every single time... every single time. If the Rs ever get a big win, they'll change the rules. Game over.

We won't know for another twenty years. 

3.1.1  Gazoo  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.1    3 weeks ago

“If the Rs ever get a big win, they'll change the rules. Game over.“

Dems have talked about ending the electoral vote. Dems have talked about packing the supreme court. Those two items would “change the rules.” What “rules” have republicans talked about changing? 

Bob Nelson
3.1.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  Gazoo @3.1.1    3 weeks ago

They aren't just talking; they're doing. They're restricting voting; they're packing the courts.

3.1.3  Gazoo  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.1.2    3 weeks ago

Filling a vacant seat is not packing the court. Packing the court is adding seats to the existing seats. I’m surprised how many dems do not know that. And restricting voting? How about some details on that?

Bob Nelson
3.1.4  Bob Nelson  replied to  Gazoo @3.1.3    3 weeks ago

"packing the courts" 


3.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.1.4    3 weeks ago

packing would mean adding a new number of judges in addition to present ones , which hasn't occurred

3.1.6  Gazoo  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.5    3 weeks ago

It’s amazing how some don’t understand something so simple. 

3.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  Gazoo @3.1.6    3 weeks ago

people hear things with little comprehension and often run with it.


Who is online

Raven Wing

30 visitors