Will they teach about Trump in history textbooks of the future? It would be so much easier to just skip over that four years of embarrassment and offer it as an elective for those with a strong stomach.
“If the Rs ever get a big win, they'll change the rules. Game over.“
Dems have talked about ending the electoral vote. Dems have talked about packing the supreme court. Those two items would “change the rules.” What “rules” have republicans talked about changing?
Filling a vacant seat is not packing the court. Packing the court is adding seats to the existing seats. I’m surprised how many dems do not know that. And restricting voting? How about some details on that?
Dear Donald;
We at the Lincoln Project just want to say "Its OK".
Seriously, we know your did your best.:-)
But as far as the being President thing, it isn't for everyone.
Its the hardest job in the world.
And it takes a lot of qualities ...that you just don't have.
Like compassion, human decency . . . and basic reading skills!
He did not! He didn't even try!
. . .. . . it doesn't matter
Because losing doesn't automatically mean"a loser".
Or failure.
Or a National Disgrace!
(To really understand what these phrases are about, you have to watch the video and see the accompanying pictures for each phrase).
Not automatically. But it this case... certainly
Will they teach about Trump in history textbooks of the future? It would be so much easier to just skip over that four years of embarrassment and offer it as an elective for those with a strong stomach.
The winners write the history books. We won't know who wins for a long time.
The Dems must win every single time... every single time. If the Rs ever get a big win, they'll change the rules. Game over.
We won't know for another twenty years.
“If the Rs ever get a big win, they'll change the rules. Game over.“
Dems have talked about ending the electoral vote. Dems have talked about packing the supreme court. Those two items would “change the rules.” What “rules” have republicans talked about changing?
They aren't just talking; they're doing. They're restricting voting; they're packing the courts.
Filling a vacant seat is not packing the court. Packing the court is adding seats to the existing seats. I’m surprised how many dems do not know that. And restricting voting? How about some details on that?
"packing the courts"
plural
packing would mean adding a new number of judges in addition to present ones , which hasn't occurred
It’s amazing how some don’t understand something so simple.
people hear things with little comprehension and often run with it.