Trump Wants A Recount In Wisconsin. How Would It Work?

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  evilgenius  •  3 weeks ago  •  17 comments

By:   BRAKKTON BOOKER

Trump Wants A Recount In Wisconsin. How Would It Work?

Remember Trump dismissed the call for a recount in 2016 when he won the state against Hillary Clinton by a similar vote count.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Not long after The Associated Press and other news outlets declared Wednesday that Democrat Joe Biden had won Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes, the Trump campaign announced it would ask for a recount in the state.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
evilgenius
1  seeder  evilgenius    3 weeks ago
Should the Trump campaign follow through on its promise to call for a recount, it will be on the hook to pay for it. 
 
 
 
Ozzwald
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  evilgenius @1    3 weeks ago
Should the Trump campaign follow through on its promise to call for a recount, it will be on the hook to pay for it.

With Trump they need to make sure he pays IN ADVANCE!

Donald Trump's Tab For MAGA Rallies Jumps to $1.8 Million as 14 Cities Say President Hasn't Paid Police Bills, Report Finds

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
1.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    3 weeks ago

They aren't ever gonna see that money, no one who gets in any way financially involved with Trump ever does. 

 
 
 
Kavika
2  Kavika     3 weeks ago
it will be on the hook to pay for it. 

Get the money upfront and in cash.

 
 
 
evilgenius
2.1  seeder  evilgenius  replied to  Kavika @2    3 weeks ago

They do have to pay a filing fee. 

 
 
 
SteevieGee
3  SteevieGee    3 weeks ago

If the difference is less than 1% and he wants a recount then he should get a recount.

 
 
 
evilgenius
3.1  seeder  evilgenius  replied to  SteevieGee @3    3 weeks ago

If he really, really wants one he can have one. It's doubtful that, at over 20K votes, it will make any difference.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
3.1.1  SteevieGee  replied to  evilgenius @3.1    3 weeks ago

I'm confident that the people counting the ballots have tried to be as accurate as possible.  20,000 errors would be a lot.

 
 
 
evilgenius
3.1.2  seeder  evilgenius  replied to  SteevieGee @3.1.1    3 weeks ago

Previous recounts in WI have moved a couple hundred votes, never thousands. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
3.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  SteevieGee @3    3 weeks ago

I mean I guess, it is a waste of time but sure :( 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
4  Paula Bartholomew    3 weeks ago

Why should Trump get a recount when Hillary didn't?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
4.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4    3 weeks ago

He’s going to demand that he be allowed to recount the votes by himself, and shred the ballots as he goes.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
4.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1    3 weeks ago

That would make a great onion story.

 
 
 
Tacos!
5  Tacos!    3 weeks ago

It is hard to imagine that they would end up changing the vote by 20K, but have at it.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
6  Thrawn 31    3 weeks ago
Trump Wants A Recount In Wisconsin.

He is gonna keep this shit up until the day he dies. The next few months are going to be him slinging shit at the wall in the form of lawsuits and just hope ANYTHING sticks (Which of course it won't because the suits contradict each other across the states and all are baseless). After noon on Jan 20 he is just going to spend the rest of his life bitching about how he was cheated because, you know, people voted and the votes were counted. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
6.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6    2 weeks ago

Maybe he will just say to hell with it.  I should get in as much golf as I can before my cellmate grabs my putter.

 
 
 
Split Personality
6.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.1    2 weeks ago

Good one!

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

Gazoo
Kavika
FLYNAVY1
cjcold
Ender
PJ


28 visitors