╌>

Dozens of Canada's First Nations lack drinking water: 'Unacceptable in a country so rich' | Canada | The Guardian

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  kavika  •  3 years ago  •  17 comments

By:   the Guardian

Dozens of Canada's First Nations lack drinking water: 'Unacceptable in a country so rich' | Canada | The Guardian
Indigenous leaders are suing the Canadian government for not providing clean water - and ministers admit they have failed

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Curve Lake First Nation, a forested community in southern Canada, is surrounded on three sides by fresh water.

But for decades, residents have been unable to safely make use of it. Wary of crumbling infrastructure and waterborne illness, the community instead relies on shipments of bottled water. The community's newly elected chief, aged 34, has lived her whole life without the guarantee of clean water flowing from the tap.

"The emotional and spiritual damage of not having clean water, having to look at all of the water surrounding us on a daily basis and unable to use it, is almost unquantifiable," said Chief Emily Whetung.

Amid mounting frustration, Whetung and other Indigenous leaders have launched national class-action lawsuits against the federal government. Arguing the federal government failed to provide clean water and forced communities to live in a manner "consistent with life in developing countries" they are suing the government for C$2.1bn (US1.7bn) damages - the costs associated with years of bottled water trucked and a water treatment system for the whole community.

Despite being one of the most water-rich nations in the world, for generations Canada has been unwilling to guarantee access to clean water for Indigenous peoples. The water in dozens of communities has been considered unsafe to drink for at least a year - and the government admits it has failed.

In 2015, Justin Trudeau, then campaigning for the country's top job, made an ambitious promise to end the scourge of unsafe water in more than 100 First Nations communities across the country. But today the federal minister overseeing the issue acknowledges the government has missed its March deadline on its own five-year promise, and says he has "no credible excuse" for how communities that have gone decades without clean water still lack access.

"It's unacceptable in a country that is financially one of the most wealthy in the world, and water rich, and the reality is that many communities don't have access to clean water," the federal Indigenous services minister, Marc Miller, told the Guardian in an interview.

The land surrounding Naskantaga First Nation as seen from a plane descending into the reservation. Photograph: Chris Donovan

Access to drinking water is something few Canadians ever have to think twice about. But the vast geography of Canada and the disparate locations of 630 First Nations communities - some accessible only by plane - makes setting up water treatment infrastructure a logistical challenge.

As a consequence of colonial-era laws, Indigenous communities have been barred from funding and managing their own water treatment systems, and the federal government bears responsibility for fixing problems.

"If you are anywhere else in Canada and you turn on the tap, then you are protected by safe drinking water regulations," said Amanda Klasing, a water researcher at Human Rights Watch. "If you live on reserve, no such regulations exist. There are no safe drinking water protections."

Certain communities, like Curve Lake, have issues with E coli in their water. Others, like Grassy Narrows, struggle with a legacy of toxic heavy metals, a remnant of negligent industry. In some cases, water is tainted by parasites and bacteria that occur naturally. In others, reactions between organic material and chemicals used to purify water can create unsafe water.

In consequence, the government issues advisories warning against using the water, and some have been in place for decades. The community of Neskantaga in northern Ontario, has been under a water advisory since 1995, researchers found, despite having a water treatment plant. In Manitoba, Shoal Lake 40's water advisory has been in place since 1997. Plans for a water treatment plant were scrapped in 2011 after the federal government balked at the cost of the project.

In those communities, children have sores and skin diseases like eczema. Others struggle with gastrointestinal disorders.

Tara Sakanee runs a bath at her home in Neskantaga. She says the water is usually varying degrees of yellow in colour and complains of itching and dry skin after showers. Photograph: Chris Donovan

For Whetung, Curve Lake's battle to get clean water encapsulates the struggles of many First Nations communities.

When Curve Lake's water treatment plant was built in 1983, it was intended to serve a population of only 56 and had a shelf life of 20 years. Despite quickly outgrowing the capacity of the plant, decades of bureaucracy have stalled the community's ability to upgrade their infrastructure. As a result, the community has dealt with multiple drinking water advisories over the years, including a recent boil-water advisory that lasted nearly two years.

An inspection of the plant by Ontario's ministry of environment found a filter that wasn't removing pathogens and malfunctioning ultra-violet treatment. While the ministry determined the community was in urgent need of a new plant, there was nothing the province could do: the plant was the responsibility of the federal government, which deemed the risk to be lower. The federal government has approved design plans for a new facility, but construction is still years away.

Until that plant is built, the shipments of bottled water will continue.

"Water is life," said Whetung. "It's what we grow our children in when they're in the womb. And we can't use any of what we have access to."

Since he first took office, Trudeau's government has made significant progress on the issue, investing more than C$2bn. In 2016, there were 105 communities with long-term drinking water advisories in place -meaning the water had been unsafe to use or consume for at least a year. As of late April, that number is down to 52 advisories in 33 communities.

A Curve Lake First Nation official, Richard Taylor, stands in a water treatment facility in October 2019. Photograph: Julien Besset/AFP via Getty Images

The federal government says the figure remains high because of delays arising from the coronavirus pandemic, and it has pledged another C$1.5bn in funding.

But a scathing report from Canada's auditor general at the end of February found that the federal government had failed to invest sufficient resources in the task and that much of the work was lagging even before the pandemic hit.

"I am very concerned and honestly disheartened that this longstanding issue is still not resolved," the auditor general, Karen Hogan, told reporters, warning it would be years before some communities have their advisories lifted. "Access to safe drinking water is a basic human necessity. I don't believe anyone would say that this is in any way an acceptable situation in Canada in 2021."

The auditor also found that a number of the drinking water advisories that the government lifted were the result of interim measures rather than long-term upgrades.

And the crisis may run deeper. Experts caution that federal monitoring does not include wells, even though 20% of First Nations communities rely on them to supply water to most homes. Nor does the government track waterborne illnesses in First Nations communities, or potential deaths that could be related to water quality.

"It seems unbelievable that there are communities that have dealt with drinking water advisories for more than two decades," said Charles Hume, an elder with the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations. "We're not looked at the same … we're actually the last on the totem pole."

Topics

  • Canada
  • This land is your land
  • Americas
  • Water
  • features

Reuse this content


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Kavika     3 years ago

NO POLITICS

In 2015, Justin Trudeau, then campaigning for the country's top job, made an ambitious promise to end the scourge of unsafe water in more than 100 First Nations communities across the country. But today the federal minister overseeing the issue acknowledges the government has missed its March deadline on its own five-year promise and says he has "no credible excuse" for how communities that have gone decades without clean water still lack access.

Seems the Canadian government has run out of excuses and now ''just can't figure out how to solve the problem''. 

Nothing new.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2  Hallux    3 years ago

Oy gevalt:

"As a consequence of colonial-era laws, Indigenous communities have been barred from funding and managing their own water treatment systems."

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Hallux @2    3 years ago

Sadly, many such things also exist in the US.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    3 years ago

Does Canada have anything equivalent to the US EPA? The EPA here regulates tribal water treatment and I may be mistaken but they have to treat their water to the same extent all other municipal water treatment systems do

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Trout Giggles @3    3 years ago

Well kinda in the US. Here is the latest set of rules regarding EPA and tribal water treatments and standards 

Of course, much of the drinking water on some reservations is not drinkable, so there is that. Some that have caught fire, some is toxic from radiation spills so on and so on and some that have no drinking water. 

.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @3.1    3 years ago
much of the drinking water on some reservations is not drinkable,

I can see that especially if it's in a arid land. Water rich states like Minnesota can treat their water for parasites and bacteria but if it's overloaded with chemical contamination, then it could be unusable.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
3.2  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    3 years ago

Even if they do, it may not cover reservations. And quite frankly... even if they are covered, look at places like Flint, MI... they're still getting bottled water shipped to them, because of the crumbling infrastructure and bad calls by city, county and state officials.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @3.2    3 years ago
because of the crumbling infrastructure and bad calls by city, county and state officials.

That is it, the local government, it wasn't the EPA that screwed up Flint's water. The local authorities decided to change sources without prior approval, somebody fudged the results from their lead and copper sampling, and just a lot of corruption and other shit that caused the mess in Flint

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
3.2.2  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.1    3 years ago

Hell yes! 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.3  Hallux  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    3 years ago

The last gov. study came out in 2011, responsibilities are a mishmash and nothing was done, if there was a buck to be passed, it became the modus operandi :

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hallux @3.3    3 years ago

Thanks for the info. It looks like different aspects of water treatment are broken down to make it more streamlined when it comes to regulations. It's pretty much how we do things in the States.

This list is the same list everywhere:

During the assessment of water and wastewater systems, six major deficiency areas were identified. These are related to:

  • design and treatment technology;
  • operation and maintenance;
  • operator skill levels;
  • monitoring;
  • operational equipment dysfunctions; and
  • water source.

It never changes.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    3 years ago

Makes you wonder how their ancestors survived

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

Our ancestors survived quite well, if you read the article you'd know that the Canadian Government is the problem.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @4.1    3 years ago

They survived in spite of the Canadian (and American) governments

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
4.1.2  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.1    3 years ago

800

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @4.1.2    3 years ago

lol

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.2  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

"Makes you wonder how their ancestors survived"

It's quite simple, no pissing or craping upstream.

 
 

Who is online



413 visitors