Supreme Court says NCAA can't limit some benefits to student athletes
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that the National Collegiate Athletic Association went too far in blocking some education-related aid for student athletes, a decision that comes as college athletics struggles with the issue of how to preserve its amateur status.
The court said the NCAA violated antitrust laws when it limited the amount students could receive for musical instruments, scientific equipment, postgraduate scholarships, tutoring, academic awards and paid internships.
Writing for the court, Justice Neil Gorsuch said a lower court's injunction is consistent with established antitrust principles.
The ruling did not, however, address the contentious issue of whether student athletes can be paid. The NCAA said it would consider this month whether student athletes can be compensated for the use of their names and images, which could allow them to benefit from endorsements and social media marketing.
Monday's decision was a victory for current and former athletes in Division I basketball and the Football Bowl Subdivision, led by former West Virginia University running back Shawne Alston and former University of California center Justine Hartman. They filed a lawsuit over the NCAA's limits on education-related benefits.
Antitrust law is involved because the schools compete aggressively for the best players and coaches. The courts have said that even though the NCAA's limits on student benefits restrain some of that competition, the rules help preserve amateur status.
The NCAA urged the court to rule in its favor.
"For more than a hundred years, the distinct character of college sports has been that it's played by students who are amateurs, which is to say that they are not paid for their play," the organization's lawyer, Seth Waxman of Washington, D.C., told the justices when the case was argued in March.
But the sports governing body faces growing pressure from state legislatures. More than a dozen have already passed laws allowing college athletes to be paid for the use of their names and images, and seven of those laws take effect in July.
The state provisions do not change the NCAA's ban on compensation from the athlete's school, but they would allow payments from other sources. Students who accept money for the use of their likenesses could risk losing their eligibility to play in sanctioned sports unless the NCAA changes its rules.
Congress is considering a bill that would provide a nationwide standard, but no action is imminent.
Tags
Who is online
405 visitors
Not a major ruling but another unanimous one.
Biden said the Court was "out of whack!"
He just says whatever the far left tells him to. It scared left wing voters and fired them up for election so he kept adding fuel to the fire.
Reality never really had anything to do with his ever shifting position on court packing.
Over his morning Tapioca, I assume.
Reality never really had anything to do with his ever shifting position on court packing.
Evidently not.
And the Biden DoJ lawyer also sided with the athletes in arguments. So what?
The Court has strung out a number of unanimous decisions of late. That destroyed the Biden complaint about a biased Court.
That's what!
Was that complaint aimed at major decisions or minor ones? Anyway, bringing Biden into this is kinda off-topic and you hit the ground running.
I didn't realize that student athletics and NCAA were such a conservatives subject. My bad. /s
What does this have to do with Biden exactly?
Are you asking about the method or the madness?
Good, this is a step in the right direction. College athletes have been getting fucked over for decades.
Used to sit next to a (now NFL famous) running back in college who was dumb as a box of rocks and cheated off of me every quiz and test. That's how we met.
Mentioned it to the Prof,. who was a friend, and I ended up with season tickets on the 50 yd. line just for helping him pass that class and others as well (I became his official tutor).
Years later I thanked him for his help. I graduated early because of him.
Earned credit for classes I wasn't even signed up for or had paid for (his classes).
The all-access passes alone that the college gave me were worth a small fortune (the VIP passes extended to B-ball and music events as well and were usually only given/sold to wealthy donors).
Also, one doesn't really learn the material until one tries to teach it. So there was that plus.
Had to study his classes as well as mine.
The fix was in but he passed all of his classes legitimately.
Colleges are "out of whack" when it comes to sports, but that fanaticism worked out well for me.