Ken Paxton must release records related to Jan. 6 Trump rally, DA says | The Texas Tribune
Category: News & Politics
Via: steve-ott • 2 years ago • 6 commentsBy: James Barragan (The Texas Tribune)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The Travis County district attorney, a Democrat, says the Republican attorney general has four days to provide communications, multiple Texas news outlets first reported.
by James Barragan Jan. 13, 2022 Updated: 23 hours ago
Copy linkRepublish State Attorney General Ken Paxton holds a press conference at the Houston Recovery Center in October. Credit: Mark Felix for The Texas Tribune
Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
The Travis County district attorney on Thursday found that Attorney General Ken Paxton violated the state's open records law by not turning over his communications from last January when he visited Washington, D.C., for a pro-Trump rally that preceded the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The district attorney's office gave Paxton four days to turn over the documents or face a lawsuit. The action was prompted by a Jan. 4, 2022, complaint by the top editors at five of the state's largest newspapers: the Austin American-Statesman, The Dallas Morning News, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, the Houston Chronicle and the San Antonio Express-News. The journalists argued that Paxton was withholding communications from the days surrounding Paxton's trip to Washington last year that are subject to public release under the state's open records law.
The Texas Public Information Act grants the public the right to government records, even those kept on personal devices or on a public official's online accounts.
Jackie Wood, director of public integrity and complex crimes at the Travis County District Attorney's Office, agreed with the journalists and hand-delivered her ruling in a letter to Paxton's office on Thursday. The letter said Paxton's office had broken Texas open records laws by withholding or failing to keep communications that would be releasable under the law.
Paxton did not respond to requests for comment late Thursday night by phone and email. On Friday, an office spokesperson denied that the state's open records law was violated.
"This is a fake controversy drummed up by hard-left local officials because they want to reignite hysteria about the attorney general's political speech on January 6, 2020, which was not an official state activity," Alejandro Garcia said in a statement. "Our agency has complied and will continue to comply with all state and federal law regarding public transparency. Travis County officials are wasting everyone's time and money with this non-issue."
Paxton led a failed attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election, joining with other GOP attorneys general in a lawsuit seeking to invalidate swing state victories by Democrat Joe Biden. He and his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, appeared at a pro-Trump rally on Jan. 6. Members of the crowd, stirred up by false claims of voter fraud, later stormed the Capitol, fought with riot police and threatened lawmakers as they disrupted Congress' certification of Biden's win over former President Donald Trump.
Normally, the Texasattorney general's office enforces the stateopen records law. But when an open records complaint is filed against a state agency, the law says the Travis County district attorney or the attorney general must handle them.
In this case, the newspapers went to Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, a Democrat.Paxton is a Republican.
The complaints stem from decisions by Paxton's office to claim attorney-client privilege to prevent the disclosure of every single email and text sent by the attorney general in the days surrounding the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Separately, the U.S. House committee investigating the events of Jan. 6 requested communications between Trump and Paxton in August. That request was part of a series of letters seeking materials from the National Archives and Records Administration, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and other executive agencies.
In their complaint to the Travis County district attorney, the newspaper editors said Paxton was failing to retain and turn over government communications that he had made on his personal cellphone. They also complained that Paxton was turning over other people's communications in response to requests for his text messages.
The determination by the Travis County district attorney adds to Paxton's political woes. The two-term Republican is seeking reelection this year but is facing stiff competition from three other GOP challengers: Land Commissioner George P. Bush, former Texas Supreme Court Justice Eva Guzman and U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert.
The three have blasted the incumbentfor multiple legal issues he is facing, including a six-year-old securities fraud case that has dogged him since his first year in office. He overcame that to win reelection in 2018. But in October 2020, eight of his former top deputies accused him of bribery and misuse of office. Weeks later, all eight deputies had either been fired or resigned from the attorney general's office.
Four of those whistleblowers are now suingPaxton under the state's whistleblower law. They are seeking compensation for lost wages and other damages, and some are seeking reinstatement to their former positions.
Paxton is also reportedly under FBI investigation for the allegations registered by the whistleblowers.
He has denied wrongdoing in all of these cases.
Jolie McCullough contributed to this story.
Tags
Who is online
247 visitors
"In their complaint to the Travis County district attorney, the newspaper editors said Paxton was failing to retain and turn over government communications that he had made on his personal cellphone. They also complained that Paxton was turning over other people's communications in response to requests for his text messages."
Apparently trumpublicans like having lawbreakers in office. Really not all that different from national trumpublicans.
Similar case where Paxton is hog tied by his own bias, forcing the decision to Travis County.
Paxton's reaction? He calls the judge a Lib and the above DA who agreed with the decision "Soros" owned.
No lack of objectivity there /s
If you can't beat 'em, deflect.
One of the good old boys just got thumped.
that seems to be growing trend for trump republicans.
It's been non productive so far and the 4 assistant DA whistle blowers could not get justice with the current
good old boy network in place, so they are suing in civil court as well.
I have Trumper neighbors that think Paxton is evil incarnate.
Go figure