╌>

Surprise! Tucker Carlson Draws the Most Democratic Viewers in Key Demo, Even Topping Rachel Maddow

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  moose-knuckle  •  2 years ago  •  53 comments

By:   Lindsey Ellefson (MSN)

Surprise! Tucker Carlson Draws the Most Democratic Viewers in Key Demo, Even Topping Rachel Maddow
There is an entire cottage industry within media dedicated to disseminating Tucker Carlson's nightly Fox News musings to presumably liberal audiences who may not be tuning in to hear what the leading conservative voice is telling his large following. But recent data from Nielsen MRI Fusion suggests those nightly dispatches may not be necessary: In October, the most recent month for which data is available, Carlson's 9 p.m. ET program was the top...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



There is an entire cottage industry within media dedicated to disseminating Tucker Carlson's nightly Fox News musings to presumably liberal audiences who may not be tuning in to hear what the leading conservative voice is telling his large following. But recent data from Nielsen MRI Fusion suggests those nightly dispatches may not be necessary: In October, the most recent month for which data is available, Carlson's 9 p.m. ET program was the top cable news show among Democrats in the advertiser-coveted age range of 25-54.

e151e5.gif© TheWrap tucker carlson

The Nielsen MRI Fusion numbers reveal that in October, Fox News unsurprisingly got the majority of the audience of self-proclaimed Republicans, with 69% of them overall tuning into total-day programming and 73% of them in the demo tuning into primetime programming. CNN and MSNBC split the remaining conservatives with totals in the low double-digit percentages. Fox News also commanded the largest number of independents in the key news demo during primetime and total-day hours: 55% of those 25-54 watched the network in primetime, compared to CNN's 23% and MSNBC's 22%. During total-day hours, 58% of independents in the demo watch Fox News, 18% chose MSNBC and 25% selected CNN.

More surprising are the stats about Carlson and Fox News' pull with self-proclaimed Democrats. Of those demo-aged viewers surveyed who identified as Democrats, 39% chose Fox News, 31% chose MSNBC and 30% chose CNN for programming from 8 p.m. ET to 11 p.m. ET. In total-day viewership, Fox News grabbed 42% of Democrats aged 25-54, CNN nabbed 33% and MSNBC got 25%.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
1  seeder  Moose Knuckle    2 years ago

Democrats love Tucker?  jrSmiley_123_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Moose Knuckle @1    2 years ago
Democrats love Tucker?

Nowadays, with the pandemic still ranging, even democrats like watching comedy.

Screen-Shot-2018-10-12-at-10.15.20-AM.png

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
1.1.1  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    2 years ago

Gee that must be it, how else would he be the democrat's favorite Cable host?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    2 years ago

If that were true, then CNN and MSNBC would have higher ratings.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.2  Krishna  replied to  Moose Knuckle @1    2 years ago

I often watch Tucker. Yes-- on the Fox News.

Does that mean you are assuming I totally agree with him..and love his rascist hate-mongering?

(I also watch reporting on the KKK and the American Nazi Party.  because I do this-- does that mean you assume I'm a Klan supporter?512

or a supporter of Nazis?)

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
1.2.1  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Krishna @1.2    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Krishna @1.2    2 years ago

The concept of “know your enemy” eludes them.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.2.3  Krishna  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.2.2    2 years ago

He who forget the past must re-live it...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.3  CB  replied to  Moose Knuckle @1    2 years ago

What, are those democrats flies?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.1  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.3    2 years ago
What, are those democrats flies?

The jury is still out on that one.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.4  cjcold  replied to  Moose Knuckle @1    2 years ago

Know thy enemy.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.1  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @1.4    2 years ago

in the top 5 of political comedies on TV.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2  Hal A. Lujah    2 years ago

Hilarious.  I’ve tried to watch a few times but it’s just unwatchable.  It is intellectually offensive from the first comment to the moment I change the channel back to actual news.  Not to mention visually offensive.  Tucker has a face for radio.

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
2.1  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2    2 years ago

According to Nielsen some of your friends are huge Tucker fans and they are lying to you. They might even be sitting in their living rooms unmasked while watching. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Moose Knuckle @2.1    2 years ago
According to Nielsen some of your friends are huge Tucker fans and they are lying to you.

WTF?

Its not only Tucker.

I've spent considerable time watching videos of the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany. I've read articles. Even a book about it.

That's a lot of time and effort spent on learning about Naziism and Fascism.

What does strike me as a bit odd (to say the least) is that by your "reasoning"-- that all that must "prove" that I'm a "Huge Hitler fan".

Well, I'm not...au contraire mon petit chou!

(P.S: I am probably the only person on this site who has a Nazi as a relative...he was German, catholic, and an officer in Hitler's army in WWII).

So...I have in interest in learning about that era,,,(does that make me a "fan" of Adolf Hitler in your mind...???

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
2.1.2  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Krishna @2.1.1    2 years ago

I heard wearing garlic around the neck keeps those pesky Nazis away. Have you tried that?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2    2 years ago

He always looks constipated.

Once he removes trumpturd from his anus, he should get some relief.  

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
2.2.1  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Tessylo @2.2    2 years ago

He looks like he probably has regular bowel movements, otherwise he'd be a disgusting heifer like Whoopi.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Tessylo @2.2    2 years ago

He looks like a shaved muppet in a suit.

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
2.2.3  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.2.2    2 years ago

That is probably the draw, he looks young. The Epsteiners love it.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.2.4  Krishna  replied to  Moose Knuckle @2.2.3    2 years ago

The Epsteiners love it.

Indeed!

512

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.2.5  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @2.2.4    2 years ago

The Epsteiners love it.

Indeed!

512

He who forgets the past must relive it!

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
2.2.6  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Krishna @2.2.4    2 years ago

Oh wow, you are good you win lol. You didn't think this one through did you?

512

I can post pics of Epstein with democrats all day long if that is what you want to do.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.3  Ender  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2    2 years ago

Comical to me when people jump on cable news as some kind of demographic of the country.

Hell, ABC nightly news only averages about 8 mil and that beats tucker by double.

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
2.3.1  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Ender @2.3    2 years ago

To compare you have to use the same criteria, age 24-54 ABC nightly news gets 1.4 Million viewers. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Ender  replied to  Moose Knuckle @2.3.1    2 years ago

And tucker gets about 500k.

And that is me being generous.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.3.3  Texan1211  replied to  Ender @2.3.2    2 years ago
And tucker gets about 500k. And that is me being generous.

So why again are Democrats so worked up over Carlson then?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @2.3.3    2 years ago

They always have to have a domestic enemy to get all worked up into a lather against.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3  Tessylo    2 years ago

I know of no Democrat/Liberal/Progressive who loves Fucker.  

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
3.1  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Tessylo @3    2 years ago

It is more likely the aren't being honest with you. Nielsen data shows it's their favorite show.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Moose Knuckle @3.1    2 years ago

It's not us Democrats/Liberals/Progressives who have a problem with honesty [Deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.1    2 years ago
Removed for context - sandy

Hmmm........does that mean that you are telling me that the Democrats cited in the article as watching Fox were telling the truth, and now you are denying that reality?

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
3.1.3  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.2    2 years ago

Mathematical probability tells us several Democrats here probably watch Tucker and enjoy it but they don't want to lose their online friends so they show up here and decry racism, homophobia, transphobia while drinking Folgers out of a Che Guevara mug.

Besides, we have to trust the Math.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Moose Knuckle @3.1.3    2 years ago

Mathematical probability tells us several Democrats here probably watch Tucker and enjoy it

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.4    2 years ago

Hey, if you've got proof to show otherwise it's more plausible than "nuh uh"...

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Ender  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.5    2 years ago

The seeder is claiming something that cannot be proven to begin with...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ender @3.1.6    2 years ago

It can be proven that there are more watching than the "nuh uh" crowd claims.  Look at the ratings.  After that is simple math. 

  1. How many conservatives are there? 
  2. How many progressives are there?  
  3. Do the ratings show there are more viewers than conservatives?  yes?
  4. Then there are progressives watching.  

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.8  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.5    2 years ago

Shouldn’t it be the seeder’s responsibility to prove how “enjoyable” Tucker is to NT members, using his aforementioned “mathematical probability”?  It’s his claim.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.8    2 years ago

And at the same time, your making a counter claim, it would be your responsibility to prove how "unenjoyable" Tucker is.  

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.10  Ender  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.7    2 years ago

You are talking overall where he was talking about people on this site.

Again, something that cannot be proven unless someone admits it.

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
3.1.11  seeder  Moose Knuckle  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.9    2 years ago

Rachel Maddow is on a leave of absence, evidently her spouse Susan Mikula has been having an affair with man who has a bigger cock than Rachel.

Tucker is trying to capture the audience, he is rumored to be growing a mullet.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.12  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Moose Knuckle @3.1.11    2 years ago

They knew she couldn't compete with the upcoming Olympics and rather than be embarrassed, she went on leave to spare herself the humiliation.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Moose Knuckle @3.1.11    2 years ago

Keep it classy there!

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.14  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.9    2 years ago

Lol.  No, that’s not how it works.  It may be how Donald Trump thinks it should work, but everyone with a functioning brain knows that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.15  Ender  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.13    2 years ago

Any doubt about who that is is gone now. We all know.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.16  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.13    2 years ago
Keep it classy there!

His comment was very reserved.

Besides, classy and Rachel Maddow don't belong in the same sentence.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.18  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.9    2 years ago

Tucker is very enjoyable and now we have Waters prime time to lead into his awesome show!  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.19  XXJefferson51  replied to  MonsterMash @3.1.17    2 years ago

👍👏🥳

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4  CB    2 years ago

I have gazed at that fool Tucker only to see what the hell is going on and true to form he is following the Fox model raw capitalist model of spin a story until it tunes in to the base. That is, if you have a discerning spirit, you can actually 'see' Tucker 'manhandling' is word-craft before inserting it into the teleprompter to push into itching ears in Fox land. That SOB is dirty from top to bottom. Total manipulation of "appointment tv" time.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4    2 years ago

From the ratings, it is clear that many Democrats don't share your view of Carlson.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2  Greg Jones  replied to  CB @4    2 years ago

You must be thinking of Joy Reid.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.1  CB  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2    2 years ago

Yes, friend Greg, sometimes I see guile in Joy Reid too at times. It serves as a reminder that we all may like to have a little play, or 'craft-work' in us from time to time. But Tucker! This guy is immersed in tv ratings. . .for ratings sake. I can't prove it, but it could be so that he trying to outdo O'Reilly in the hour from the past and Hannity in the present. It is a big task, but he is well on his way with all the intrigue he drums up for "itching ears" to ingest.

A little random 'game' I could forgive anybody for (it's human after-all). But, when guile and working deceit by word-smithing manipulation every day on the air is cause for head-lines then one is becoming a bit of a shock-jock. A la "El Rushbo" (May he rest in peace.)

 
 

Who is online






184 visitors