╌>

Leonard Pitts Jr.: These are no 'ordinary citizens' | TribLIVE.com

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  2 years ago  •  3 comments

By:   Leonard Pitts Jr (TribLIVE. com)

Leonard Pitts Jr.: These are no 'ordinary citizens' | TribLIVE.com
They stormed through police barricades, these “ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.” They shattered windows and chanted death to the vice president, these “ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.” They smeared their own feces on the wall, “ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.” Over the last 13

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Leonard Pitts Jr.
Friday, Feb. 11, 2022 2:15 p.m.| Friday, Feb. 11, 2022 2:15 p.m. Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/TNS Police try to hold back protesters who gather to storm the Capitol and halt a joint session of the 117th Congress Jan. 6, 2021,in Washington, D.C.

They stormed through police barricades, these "ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse."

They shattered windows and chanted death to the vice president, these "ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse."

They smeared their own feces on the wall, "ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse."

Over the last 13 months, we've heard Republicans offer all sorts of rationalizations for the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. We've heard the white nationalist thugs who perpetrated it called patriotic and good and likened to tourists. We've borne repeated insults to intelligence, memory and the service of police who defended against these gangsters as they tried to overthrow an American election.

But even that was scant preparation for the resolution the party adopted last week. It accused the Jan. 6 Select Committee — the one Democrats in the House impaneled after Republicans refused to support a full congressional probe — of "the persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse." Mind you, that "legitimate political discourse" gouged eyes and broke bones, erected a gallows and paraded a traitor's flag through the people's house.

The resolution's larger purpose was to formally censure Reps. Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney, which it described as people who "purport to be" Republicans. Their sin? To serve on the aforementioned committee. You'd think every American, regardless of political affiliation, would want to know all they could about what happened on Jan. 6. You'd think every American would demand accountability.

You'd be mistaken. The GOP has other priorities.

Keep in mind that on the national level, Republicans are losers. Only once in 30 years has the party won the popular vote on the way to the presidency. Small wonder. The GOP stands on the wrong side of every important social and demographic trend reshaping this country.

They could choose to confront that challenge by strategizing ways to appeal to the rising new electorate. Or, they could do what they've been doing: work overtime to energize their old electorate. Scare them half to death by telling them how they're being victimized by "critical race theory," "cancel culture," "radical wokeism" and every other piece of scary-sounding jargon they can manufacture or inflate. Embrace a strategy of sophistry and gaslights, suppress votes, push the Big Lie and the bigger contempt for democratic norms.

Last week's resolution was right out of that playbook. But even at that, the statement was chilling.

Not because it provided fresh, albeit superfluous, evidence of Republican estrangement from objective reality, but because it implicitly endorsed political violence, even normalized it. And while Donald Trump does that on a regular basis, one is hard-pressed to recall when it has ever been stated in print by the party's administrative leadership.

The distinction matters. It makes this moment feel like a Rubicon decisively crossed and renewed political violence more likely than not.

"We're gonna drag mother(expletive)s through the streets," declares one man on a Jan. 6 video newly released by the Justice Department. "Cut their head off!" he cries, this "ordinary citizen engaged in legitimate political discourse."

Imagine what he'd say if he was a violent insurrectionist out to burn the country down.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a national columnist for The Miami Herald and the winner of a Pulitzer Prize for commentary.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 years ago
Over the last 13 months, we've heard Republicans offer all sorts of rationalizations for the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. We've heard the white nationalist thugs who perpetrated it called patriotic and good and likened to tourists. We've borne repeated insults to intelligence, memory and the service of police who defended against these gangsters as they tried to overthrow an American election.
 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    2 years ago

From the moron author that thinks BLM and Antifa are not a threat; and that couldn't care less when a white couple was raped and murdered in a truly heinous way by African Americans in a hate crime. Instead turning it into a lecture on how good "whites" have it. He is truly a special kind of racist asshole.

It always amazes me when white people put on the victim hat. As in victim of racial oppression. By any measure - health, education, economics, employment - white Americans enjoy a superior standard of living. If that's racial oppression, sign me up.

But still, one occasionally hears mewling noises from that subset of my white countrymen who feel put upon by big, bad racial minorities. This is one of those times. And Knoxville, Tenn., has become the capital city of that lunatic fringe...

That has changed. A constellation of white supremacists and conservative bloggers has pushed the story into the national limelight as illustration of their argument that news media, constrained by political correctness, refuse to report black on white crime while pulling out all the stops when crime is white on black as in the Duke lacrosse debacle. Me, I would see their Duke case and raise them a Central Park jogger, but what do I know?

...For instance, there's "Off Balance: Youth, Race and Crime in the News," a 2001 report that concluded: Blacks and Latinos are underrepresented in news media as victims of crime and significantly overrepresented as perpetrators, based on crime statistics; newspaper articles about white homicide victims are longer and more frequent than those about black ones; and interracial violent crime is more likely to be reported even though it is just about the rarest kind of violent crime.

Thanks John; for showing us what the left truly follows.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @2    2 years ago

Conservative support for the Jan 6 traitors is noted

 
 

Who is online

Krishna
Kavika
JBB


430 visitors