US asks farmers: Can you plant 2 crops instead of 1? | AP News
Category: News & Politics
Via: perrie-halpern • 3 years ago • 19 commentsBy: Scott McFetridge (AP NEWS)


DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — There is only so much farmland in the United States, so when Russia's invasion of Ukraine last spring prompted worries that people would go hungry as wheat remained stuck in blockaded ports, there was little U.S. farmers could do to meet the new demand.
But that may be changing.
Earlier this summer, the U.S. Department of Agriculture instituted new policies to encourage American farmers to begin growing two crops on one piece of land, one after the other, a practice known as double-cropping. By changing insurance rules to lessen the risk of growing two crops, the USDA hopes to significantly increase the amount of wheat that U.S. farmers could grow every year, lessening the reliance on big wheat producers like Ukraine and Russia and eliminating bottlenecks.
The idea is an intriguing development from the Ukraine war that hasn't received widespread attention. As fall approaches, it's unclear how many farmers will actually try the new system, but some who already grow two crops say it's something farmers should consider.
"I think it's a great idea," said Illinois farmer Jeff O'Connor, who has double-cropped for years and hosted President Joe Biden at an event in May to promote efforts to increase food production. "How successful it will be, I don't know."
Even if the effort is only moderately successful, agriculture groups are hoping for new ways of meeting a growing global demand for food while generating more profit for farmers amid high fertilizer and fuel costs. As Andrew Larson with the Illinois Soybean Association put it, "It removes some of the hurdles and provides a lot more flexibility."
In 2020, the U.S. exported wheat valued at $6.3 billion. The U.S. along with Russia, Australia and Canada usually lead the world in wheat exports, with Ukraine typically ranked fifth, though its shipments will drop this year due to the war.
Double-cropping isn't new in parts of the South and southern Midwest, which have the key advantage of longer growing seasons. Those warmer temperatures let farmers squeeze in a fall planting of one crop — usually winter wheat — that is dormant over the winter and then grows and can be harvested in late spring, just as farmers plant a second crop — typically soybeans.
The problem comes when cool weather delays the spring harvest of wheat, which in turn delays the planting of soybeans. And that's where the USDA's new effort could ease the risk of a costly planting backup.
The USDA's Risk Management Agency would streamline crop insurance approvals for farmers planting a second crop in more than 1,500 counties where double-cropping seems viable. The agency also would work with crop insurers and farm groups to promote a greater availability of coverage in other counties.
In announcing its effort, the USDA said it was aiming to "stabilize food prices and feed Americans and the world amidst continuing challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, and the invasion of Ukraine by Russia."
The USDA didn't mention climate change, but the agency and other experts have long said warming temperatures will spur farmers to rethink what they grow and how.
The new program is focused more on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which is a leading supplier of wheat to people in Africa and the Middle East. After the invasion, wheat prices nearly doubled to over $12 a bushel, though since then prices have steadily dropped as supply concerns have eased, in part because of agreements that have allowed for the export of some Ukraine wheat.
The USDA didn't respond to a request for details about how many farmers the agency hopes will begin double-cropping or how much U.S production could increase.
Farmers who double-crop often have smaller crops, but two smaller crops would still be significantly larger than an individual crop.
A study published in August by the University of Illinois and Ohio State University found that was certainly the case this year, as high wheat prices resulted in double-cropped land in southern Illinois bringing a projected $251 per acre return for wheat and soybeans, which is $81 higher than a stand-alone soybean crop. The double-crop benefit was less dramatic in other parts of the state and could be less if wheat prices drop.
Mark Lehenbauer, who raises livestock and grows row crops near Palmyra, Missouri, said he's double-cropped for years and finds it reliably profitable. Still, he cautions that there is a years-long learning curve as farmers learn how to accomplish the task of planting one crop just as they need to harvest another.
And Lehenbauer acknowledged that many farmers may simply be reluctant to take on the added risks or extra workload.
"There are a lot of extra steps in there," Lehenbauer said. "It adds some complexity."
Ultimately, the biggest factor behind whether farmers begin growing an extra crop of wheat is what price they can get for the crop, said Pat Westhoff, director of the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri. Although prices have dropped from the peaks soon after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, they remain at the still profitable level of nearly $8 a bushel.
"It really comes down to where wheat prices go in the future," he said. "Even with the drop in prices we've seen, wheat prices are pretty high so there should be a little more incentive for wheat double cropping in this next year than there has been."
___

We take farming and farmers too much for granted until it's gone.
The President has screwed the pooch and NOW the government needs farmers. The unintended consequences of central planning never ceases to amaze.
Urban politicians have been dumping on farmers for decades. Environmentalists have portrayed farmers as greedy exploiters destroying nature. Democrats want to increases taxes on businesses like farms. How long can liberals kick that dog and expect it to remain loyal?
This is driven by the President's FUBAR foreign policy and not by concerns over farming.
Farmers who double-crop often have smaller crops, but two smaller crops would still be significantly larger than an individual crop.
Is anyone in the US government responsible for studying and reporting on how double cropping wheat will impact soil health?
Furthermore, is anyone in the US government studying and reporting on how climate change is going to impact the health of soil in the US or are our government's leaders so pathetically inept that they will ignore what happened when ignorant farming practices and climate collided and gave us the Oklahoma Dust Bowl not so very long ago?
And yet how much of that farmland is owned by foreign interests?
I just googled who owns most of the US farmland. Interesting results, but I was not surprised. Land has been a major investment for US millionaires for decades. Many farmers have to lease land to farm. I have read that US farm subsidies are often paid to landowners instead of the lessees (requires further research to verify). If true, then double cropping insurance may be paid to landowners instead of lessees and would be a further tax giveaway to the richest men in the US, perhaps the world.
Top 10 Largest Farmland Owners In The US In 2022 - Farmland Riches
Top 10 Largest Farmland Owners In The US In 2022
Some of the links on this site are affiliate links. Farmland Riches is sponsored by AcreTrader.
Farmland has been an asset that has held value for thousands of years. Only recently has this investment become “trendy.” Deemed as a boring investment by many, farmland has a lot of desirable traits that make it a solid option for diversifying your portfolio.
The question becomes, who owns the most farmland in the United States of America?
more....
The Drummond Ranch is 433 thousand acres.
I don't think it is one of the biggest in the US...
more info at another site...
info from 2017...
Urban sprawl, corporate land investment and climate change is sounding the death knell for farming in the US.
more
No doubt in part, at least, because their kids want no part of the bullshit that their parents and grandparents had to endure. I'm sure that the easier dollars and instant gratification of selling the real estate is much more appealing.
GregTx,
The average age of farmers is over 55. Most farms are fairly small and cannot support a family without one, or both, parent(s) working a job off the farm. When the kids graduate high school, there are few affordable opportunities to go into farming if they wanted to. If the parents manage to hang onto the farm until retirement age (or most likely death), then the "kids" are usually over 40 and have been employed off the farm for decades.
Few people want to work (or be on call) 24/7 hoping to get a check at the end of the year that will pay for the seed, the feed, the equipment, the supplies, the taxes and leave enough to pay for the phone, electricity and groceries.
In my experience, farming can have several boon years that are quickly followed by downturns that result in years of financial deprivation.
I won't condemn anyone for not risking their mental and physical health by trying to eke out an existence being a farmer.
Foreigners own nearly 37.6 million acres or 3% of all privately held farmland.
We need national laws to protect our land and water sources from misuse from both foreign and domestic landowners.
I believe it is imperative that we include scientific data on the sustainability of water and soil usage. I am not sure that we have anyone in politics in the US that is qualified to make the decisions to ensure the best use of our natural resources to feed our population.
“…sustainability of water…”
The alarm bells have been ringing for years here in the west. The visual evidence is irrefutable and the consequences are dire at best. And yet the issue has been continually tabled, just as every water table continually drops.
It is simply unsustainable and communities like Las Vegas and Phoenix and every town in between may become ghost towns in the next century…that is if we choose to continue to feed our nation.
I just watched "The End is Nye" on Peacock TV.
The health of the Ogallala Aquifer is critical to US food supply. The Ogallala Aquifer is not healthy. Double cropping any land that requires irrigation from the Ogallala Aquifer is probably a really bad idea.
Is anyone in US government concerned about the future of our children and grandchildren? If so, who?
I only became aware of the importance of the Ogallala Aquifer when the possibility of tar sands pollution became a contentious issue during the fight against the XL pipeline.
Morning...we are looking at our third year for a record bumper wheat crop...
Ships have been coming in here for months loading wheat and other grains etc..the US, Canada and us should be able to make up most of the short fall until Ukraine gets back on the scene again.
It's just as well we are in the Southern Hemisphere even if we are upside down to keep the world supplied with all sorts of grains..😁
Forbes has a recent article on how severe drought has impacted US farmers.