Officials: Musk seeks US funds for Ukraine satellite network | AP News
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Defense Department has gotten a request from SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk to take over funding for his satellite network that has provided crucial battlefield communications for Ukrainian military forces since almost the beginning of its war with Russia, U.S. officials said Friday.
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter not yet made public, said the issue has been discussed in meetings and senior leaders are weighing the matter. There have been no decisions.
In a statement later Friday, Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh said, "We can confirm the Department received correspondence from SpaceX about the funding of Starlink, their satellite communications product in Ukraine. We remain in communication with SpaceX about this and other topics."
During a Pentagon briefing, she declined to provide any details about the communication or say to whom the correspondence was sent and when the communications with Musk began.
Musk began sending Starlink satellite dishes to Ukraine just days after Russia invaded in February. On Feb. 28, Ukrainian Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov tweeted a photo of the first Starlink kits arriving on the back of a truck.
"You are most welcome," Musk tweeted back.
Musk's generosity was hailed by Ukrainians and seen as a game changer in war tactics — the Russians could try to cut Ukrainian ground communications but it could not control space.
The Starlink system of more than 2,200 low-orbiting satellites has provided broadband internet to more than 150,000 Ukrainian ground stations. Early Friday, Musk tweeted that it was costing SpaceX $20 million a month to support Ukraine's communications needs.
In addition to the terminals, he tweeted that the company has to create, launch, maintain and replenish satellites and ground stations.
CNN was the first to report the Musk request.
The Starlink satellite internet's vital role in Ukraine's defense cannot be overstated. It has, for example, assisted front-line reconnaissance drone operators in targeting artillery strikes on key Russian assets. A senior military official on Friday made it clear that the U.S. believes the system has proven exceptionally effective on the battlefield. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to provide U.S. assessment of the Ukrainian battlefield.
In a tweet on Friday, Ukrainian presidential adviser Mikhail Podolyak said Ukraine will find a solution to keep Starlink working.
"Let's be honest. Like it or not, @elonmusk helped us survive the most critical moments of war. Business has the right to its own strategies," he tweeted. "We expect that the company will provide stable connection till the end of negotiations."
In response to multiple questions during the briefing, Singh said the Pentagon was working with the Ukrainian Defense Ministry. "We know that there is this demand, and (satellite communications) capability ... is needed and we want to be able to ensure that there are stable communications for the Ukrainian forces and for Ukraine."
The request from the world's richest man to have the Pentagon take over the hundreds of millions of dollars he says the system is costing comes on the heels of a Twitter war between Musk and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. And in tweets overnight Musk referred to the friction, suggesting it may affect his decision to end his company's largesse in funding the systems.
In a Twitter exchange last week, Musk argued that to reach peace Russia should be allowed to keep the Crimean Peninsula, which it seized in 2014. He also said Ukraine should adopt a neutral status, dropping a bid to join NATO.
Musk also started a Twitter poll asking whether "the will of the people" should decide if seized regions remain part of Ukraine or become part of Russia.
In a sarcastic response, Zelenskyy posted a Twitter poll of his own asking "which Elon Musk do you like more?": "One who supports Ukraine" or "One who supports Russia." Musk replied to Zelenskyy that "I still very much support Ukraine, but am convinced that massive escalation of the war will cause great harm to Ukraine and possibly the world."
Andrij Melnyk, the outgoing Ukrainian ambassador to Germany, responded to Musk's original tweet with an obscenity.
It's not clear how much of the cost of deploying Starlink satellite uplinks in Ukraine has been covered by U.S. funding. In April, the U.S. Agency for International Development said it had delivered 5,000 of the terminals. The Pentagon had no response to that question.
Musk's commitment to spend $44 billion to purchase Twitter "has to factor into his decision that he can no longer afford to do this for free," said retired Army Maj. Gen. John Ferrari, a non-resident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Musk's request that the Pentagon begin to pick up the tab comes as the Space Force and Pentagon have been looking at how commercial vendors will play a role in national security. Musk's threat to withdraw highlights the risk of leaning too much on commercial capabilities, Ferrari said.
"Commercial vendors always get to change their mind, " Ferrari said, adding that the reliance on Starlink to provide communications for Ukraine also serves as a reminder that the Pentagon has to expand this service beyond SpaceX, he said.
"The government needs many vendors for key capabilities, of course that often means more money, but it is an insurance policy and insurance costs money," Ferrari said.
In March, commander of U.S. Space Command Army Gen. James Dickinson said that having vendors provide needed capabilities, such as Maxar's satellite imagery of stalled Russian convoys, has become essential, because it frees up limited military satellite assets to focus on other things.
In his tweets, Musk also raised a question that various vendors and the Pentagon are considering as space becomes a more critical part of wartime operations: If a commercial vendor is assisting the U.S. and is targeted, does the U.S. owe it protection?
"We've also had to defend against cyberattacks & jamming, which are getting harder," Musk tweeted.
____
right 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Tags
Who is online
425 visitors
Maybe he has a point about the money.
As annoying as he is, he does seem to have technology in the right place at the right time a lot. How does he do that?
Elon Musk’s growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies
Perhaps the US should pull back some of the subsidies that he has enjoyed.
Apparently, our government values E vehicles, solar panels, and commercial space capabilities. Did we get insufficient value for the government investments?
You, being a lifelong government employee should be able to answer your own question. Give it a try the thought process will help keep you abreast of the value of or non-value of government subsidies.
Or perhaps the US and Europe should chip in to subsidize internet access for Ukraine?
I'm not a Musk fanboy. In order for me to actually be fond of this billionaire he would have to stop trolling us all like he was some sort of Trump mini-Me.
However, he's raised an issue that the internet access for Ukraine isn't exactly being fully paid for by obviously cash strapped Ukraine. Maybe Musk is making a valid point or maybe he is a greedy asshole. I don't want simply skip to the the latter conclusion without considering the former possibility.
Grants, tax credits, and loans.
Interesting that Democrats control Congress and the WH, and yet, we never, ever hear a liberal ask why they are giving that money to him.
Instead of making Musk out to be the bad guy, why not implore your Congress critters to punish him by removing some of that stuff?
I didn't make him out to be a bad guy simply stated a fact.
Also some of those grants, tax credits and loans were made during a Republican administration.
But now Democrats are in charge, and you have said nothing about Democrats stopping them.
Shocker.
Not really a shocker, I pointed out that republicans were also part of the subsidy support which is a fact. So it's both parties that have done it.
Looks to me only liberals are whining about it now, though.
Why is that?
No one is whining about it so why are you making stuff up is the question. Facts are whining to you, quite amazing.
Musk has also stated that he doesn't believe in ''government subsidies'', but seems to be enjoying them.
It has no relevance to what Musk is asking for currently.
Why not if the government is offering them?
He may not like paying taxes, either, but still does.
Like Solyndra?
Oh, wait, Musk is STILL in business.
I agree with Mr. Musk, governments as collectives are more suited to this kind of undertaking. Before cost and damages increase exponentially or worse nefarious activity damage the technology/ies. Then who will cover it, repair it, or replace it for Musk? (This was not supposed to be an 'indefinite' offer of assistance.)