The New York Times publishes a terrorist (again) | Washington Examiner
Category: News & Politics
Via: texan1211 • 2 years ago • 1 commentsBy: Andreas Malm (Washington Examiner)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Establishment media is promoting a terrorist in order to support its climate change agenda.
In other words, it's a day ending in -y.
The New York Times published an opinion piece by Andreas Malm, an eco-terrorist who uses the piece to call for "sabotage" that would "shut down" everything including "stations, pipelines, platforms, derricks, terminals, mines, and shafts" in order to "save humanity." He is as delusional of a climate activist as you can find, praising millions of dollars in damage at construction sites and talking of "climate militancy" and "guerilla warfare."
Folks, this guys is not using metaphors. The New York Times is giving its platform to a man calling for criminal behavior that could well get people killed. https://t.co/ZMzkvEZvC1pic.twitter.com/YN4eOMrTxx
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) October 21, 2022
Oddly enough, there is no outrage from the New York Times reporters or opinion writers over this piece. No one is warning of the danger it poses to people who work on construction sites or pipelines. No one is even pointing out that Malm's preferred future (which is, of course, communism) would not solve any climate change issues the way innovation would. There is not a peep from the New York Times staff or leadership over publishing a piece by an eco-terrorist promoting eco-terrorism.
It is a marked difference from the meltdown that ensued when Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) called for the military to help law enforcement quell Black Lives Matter riots that destroyed millions of dollars in property and put people's lives in danger. The New York Times newsroom melted down over that opinion piece, resulting in the editor of the editorial page being forced out of his job. While Malm calls for people to become criminals, Cotton called for law enforcement to protect people from criminals. Only one of those things offended the New York Times staff.
Of course, publishing terrorists is nothing new for the New York Times . The outlet published an opinion piece titled "What We, the Taliban, Want," written by Sirajuddin Haqqani, who is wanted by the FBI in connection to a 2008 terrorist attack that killed six people in Kabul, Afghanistan, including an American citizen. It also published an opinion piece by a former adviser to the Palestinian Liberation Organization (which was declared a terror organization in 1987) and another by a Chinese Communist Party enforcer.
On top of that, the outlet has also whitewashed the obituaries of terrorists Qassem Soleimani and Kathy Boudin (as well as those of murderous thugs such as Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and Chinese dictator Mao Zedong). Whitewashing terrorism isn't exactly breaking new ground at the "paper of record."
None of those terrorists or authoritarians, whether published in the opinion section or mourned in the obituary section, drew the same ire from the New York Times staffers as did the publishing of a Republican senator calling for rioters to be stopped. Perhaps the next person to "blow up a pipeline," as Malm wants to see, will also get a glowing obituary as a climate hero from the New York Times .
Tags
Who is online
403 visitors
The Fishwrap of Record does itself proud again.
Slowly losing credibility, even if the "bible" here refuses to admit to it.