╌>

U.S. carried out Nord Stream bomb attack under top secret plan led by Joe Biden, report claims

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  20 comments

By:   Lewis Pennock (Mail Online)

U.S. carried out Nord Stream bomb attack under top secret plan led by Joe Biden, report claims
U.S. Navy diving teams carried out the attack against the Nord Stream pipelines during a top secret mission overseen by President Joe Biden, a bombshell report claims.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Specialized U.S. Navy diving teams carried out the bombing attack against the underwater Nord Stream pipelines which supply Russian gas to western Europe during a top secret mission overseen by President Joe Biden, a bombshell report claims.

Divers planted C4 explosives on three Nord Stream pipelines in June 2022 which were detonated three months later using a sonar buoy which broadcast a signal that triggered the bombs, according to the report.

The attack was carried out in response to Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine and designed to force Germany and other European nations to end their reliance on Russian gas, it is claimed. The move would also disrupt Moscow's income from gas sales - which have contributed billions of dollars to its war effort.

The sensational report by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh, published to his Substack, cites a source 'with direct knowledge of the operational planning' behind the alleged plot. The White House and the CIA flatly rejected the report on Wednesday, branding it 'complete fiction'.

Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were sabotaged by bomb blasts on September 26 2022 in an attack that, ostensibly, continues to baffle investigators. While analysts say the immediate impact of the attack was 'limited' - because the pipelines were not fully operational - the geopolitical consequences were huge.

A report by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh claims the U.S. was responsible for the Nord Stream pipeline attacks. Navy divers alleged planted the explosives in June, using NATO exercises as cover. They were then detonated remotely in September, it is claimed.

Various theories have been floated for who carried out the attack, and how. Both the U.S. and Russia deny responsibility.

The blasts happened on September 26, 2022. The report claims U.S. Navy divers planted the explosives three months earlier, in June, before they were remotely detonated

Russia, which has pointed the finger at the U.S., reportedly believes repairs will cost at least $500 million, but the Kremlin still hasn't confirmed the pipes will be fixed. The Nord Stream project cost around $20 billion and took 15 years to construct.

In a compelling, 5,000-word report about the alleged attack, Hersh claims diving experts trained at the U.S. Navy Diving and Salvage Center in Florida planted the explosives.

The divers are said to have carried out the top secret and highly-dangerous operation during BALTOPS22, a series of military exercises in the Baltic Sea carried out by 16 NATO countries. The U.S. divers reportedly used the highly-publicized, 13-day event in June 2022 as cover for their top-secret mission.

The C4 explosives attached to the pipelines were fitted with sensors that enabled them to be detonated remotely at a later date, Hersh reports.

Hersh reports that the explosions were triggered by a sonar buoy dropped by an aircraft. The buoy emitted a sequence of 'unique low frequency tonal sounds', compared to those produced by a flute or piano, which triggered the C4.

A spokesman for the White House said the report is 'false and complete fiction'. A spokesman for the CIA said: 'This claim is completely and utterly false.'

In February, Biden said the U.S. would 'bring an end' to Nord Stream if Russia invaded Ukraine. During a joint news conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Biden said: 'If Russia invades... then there will be longer Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.'

Asked how he would do that, the President responded cryptically: 'I promise you we will be able to do it.'

The press conference was held as Russia was mounting tens of thousands of troops at its border with Ukraine, in preparation for the invasion which began weeks later, on February 24.

Joe Biden reportedly oversaw the plot - but the White House and the CIA have said the report is 'false'. Vladimir Putin has accused the U.S. of involvement in the attack

The Nord Stream pipelines - which cost around $20 billion and took 15 years to construct - formed a key part of Europe's energy infrastructure. It is claimed the U.S. carried out the attack in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and to curb Europe's reliance on gas from Moscow

Thousands of tons of natural gas was released into the Baltic Sea after the blasts, causing a dangerous swell that disrupted shipping and triggered fears of an environmental catastrophe

Planning for the attack reportedly began amid Russia's mobilization of troops and fears inside the White House that Nord Stream 2, which was completed in 2021, would allow the Kremlin to further weaponize its energy supplies to Europe.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan convened a meeting in December 2021 of a new task force formed of officials from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the CIA, and the State and Treasure Departments.

The discussion was geared towards orchestrating a response to Russia's impending invasion of Ukraine.

Hersh reports: 'What became clear to participants, according to the source with direct knowledge of the process, is that Sullivan intended for the group to come up with a plan for the destruction of the two Nord Stream pipelines—and that he was delivering on the desires of the President.'

Several ideas were shared before the dive mission was selected. Other plans included using a submarine to attack the pipeline or aircraft to drop bombs with delayed fuses, it is claimed.

CIA director William Burns is said to have authorized a 'working group' to draw up the plan for deep-sea divers to carry out the mission. Hersh likened the plot to an undersea spying operation launched by the U.S. in the 1970s, when operatives tapped into underwater communication cables used by the Russian Navy.

According to Hersh, in early 2022, the CIA group told Sullivan's task force: 'We have a way to blow up the pipelines.'

The planners decided that Norway could serve as an ideal base for the operation because, in the words of Hersh's source, the Scandinavian nation 'hated the Russians and the Norwegian navy was full of superb sailors and divers who had generations of experience in highly profitable deep-sea oil and gas exploration'.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (pictured) has accused the United States of direct involvement in explosions that severely damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea

In March, members of the U.S. planning team flew to Norway for discussions with the Norwegian Secret Service and Navy. They decided to carry out the blasts near Denmark's Bornholm Island, it is claimed. Norway's foreign ministry said on Wednesday: 'These allegations are false.'

The initial plan was to plant explosives with a 48-hour timer, but the White House later asked for a method that would allow more control over the timing of the blasts, and the buoy technique was developed, according to the report.

Hersh reports that the buoy was dropped by a Norwegian Navy P8 surveillance plane on September 26 'during a seemingly routine flight' and the explosives detonated a few hours later.

Hersh is a former New York Times and New Yorker reporter who won numerous awards for his investigative journalism, including about the Vietnam War and the 2004 Abu Ghraib scandal following the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

His reporting has previously been criticized for its heavy reliance on unnamed and anonymous sources.

More recently, he ignited controversy with a report disputing the Obama administration's version of the 2011 killing of al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden in a U.S. special forces operation. He also drew criticism for another report accusing Syrian rebels of staging an August 2013 sarin nerve agent attack that killed hundreds of civilians.

Earlier this month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the U.S. of direct involvement in the explosions.

Russia's chief diplomat referenced a recent statement made by U.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, who in a recent Senate hearing hailed the destruction of the pipeline. Lavrov described her words as a 'confession'.

'This is not only the direct participation of the United States in the explosions of the Nord Stream pipelines. Ms. Nuland has now made a confession,' he told state television in an interview broadcast earlier today.

Nuland said on January 26: 'I am, and I think the (Biden) administration is very gratified to know that Nord Stream 2 is now... a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea.'

No one has claimed responsibility for the explosions, despite two separate investigations by Swedish and Danish authorities having concluded the pipelines were sabotaged.

Russia's foreign ministry said on Wednesday the United States had questions to answer over its role in explosions following Hersh's report.

Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called on the White House to comment on the 'facts' that had been presented.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    last year

"I’m troubled that I can’t immediately rule out the suggestion that the U.S. blew up Nord Stream. I checked with a bunch of Senate colleagues. Among those I’ve asked, none were ever briefed on this. If it turns out to be true, we’ve got a huge problem."  Senator Mike Lee.





 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

Hersh is a once respected journalist/author  who who won a Pulitzer Prize back in 1970. He has since over the decades morphed into a liberal  off the rails conspiracy theorist who makes wild claims and uses extensive unnamed sources to try to back himself up. Sounds like he wants one more Pulitzer under his belt before he dies.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    last year

He may only trying to connect dots.

If he has anything here, it will be a big story.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    last year

While not as bad, Hersh in some ways reminds of British author David Irving.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Vic Eldred    last year

House members were just briefed this morning on the Chinese balloon fiasco.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    last year

Seymour Hersh is a left wing, anti-American nutjob. He has a long history of making up allegations he can't provide any proof of. 

 I'd be careful of accepting anything he writes without further verification. 

If he's accurate, Biden is in trouble. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    last year
He has a long history of making up allegations he can't provide any proof of. 

But he did come up with the My Lai massacre.

You are right on all counts. We have to wait and see. One thing Hersh has going for him: motive.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ronin2  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    last year

Democrats will never move to impeach Brandon- no matter how big of a fuck up he makes.

They will crucify Hersh as being a right wing nut job now out to get Brandon.

It doesn't matter what his past credentials are.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @3.2    last year
They will crucify Hersh as being a right wing nut job now out to get Brandon.

We may be hearing that right here within hours.  


Democrats will never move to impeach Brandon

Impeach no, replace yes. Biden is still trying to play it cute on announcing his 2024 campaign. It is so fragile. I think if Gov Newsom announced that he was running, Biden would be in immediate trouble.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.1    last year
e may be hearing that right here within hours. 

Depends what talking points are issued. My guess it will be ignored and they hope it will go away.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2.2    last year

That seems to be the most recent tactic.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4  George    last year

So Biden created a huge ecological disaster?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  George @4    last year
Democrats will never move to impeach Brandon

He very well may have. His top officials promised something would stop the pipeline if Russia invaded the Ukraine.

Those threats now loom large.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
5  SteevieGee    last year
The United States and NATO have called the incident "an act of sabotage." Moscow has blamed the West for the unexplained explosions that caused the ruptures. Neither side has provided evidence.   -  Reuters

Either way, I think it's a good thing it's been blown up.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1  Ronin2  replied to  SteevieGee @5    last year

Damage to the environment from blowing them up be damned right?

Will you say the same thing if Russia decides to blow up a couple of US pipelines? Or a few of our ally's pipelines in retaliation?

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
5.1.1  SteevieGee  replied to  Ronin2 @5.1    last year

The environmental benefits from not burning all the gas that would have been shipped through that pipeline have already far outweighed the damage from the spill.  The fact that it's gonna be hard to repair it just makes it harder for Germany to go back to using Russian gas after the Ukrainians kick them out of their country.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6  Nerm_L    last year

The US Navy really did have this capability 30 years ago.  If the Navy maintained that capability then such a mission wouldn't require any new gadgets or technical developments.  The only requirement would be normal mission prep.

Never underestimate the military mindset.  And with a weak President, such things can easily become a reality.  

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
7  Hal A. Lujah    last year

… designed to force Germany and other European nations to end their reliance on Russian gas, it is claimed. The move would also disrupt Moscow's income from gas sales - which have contributed billions of dollars to its war effort.

Are these bad things?  Or are they only bad when a Republican POTUS doesn’t do them?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
7.1  Ronin2  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7    last year

Seems leftists don't give a damn about the environment so long as the cause has a D behind their name.

Russia decides to retaliate and blow up some US or our ally pipelines in retaliation are you going to be fine with that?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
7.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Ronin2 @7.1    last year

Can we please stop pretending that any of this is within the control or purview of 99.999999999999% of the citizens of this country?  There isn’t even agreement in this thread over whether this article could be true.  It just is what it is.

 
 

Who is online

Krishna
Jeremy Retired in NC


437 visitors