╌>

Neil Gorsuch caught selling property to head of law firm "involved in at least 22" SCOTUS cases | Salon.com

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  last year  •  8 comments

By:   Gabriella Ferrigine (Salon)

Neil Gorsuch caught selling property to head of law firm "involved in at least 22" SCOTUS cases | Salon.com
Gorsuch found a buyer just nine days after his confirmation — but didn't disclose it.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch found a buyer for a 40-acre property he had been trying to sell for nearly two years, only nine days after being confirmed for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, according to Politico.

Brian Duffy, the chief executive of top law firm Greenberg Traurig, bought the land co-owned by Gorsuch in Granby, Colorado in 2017. A deed in the county's record system shows that Duffy and his wife closed on the home located on the plot of land for $1.825 million. Given that he had a 20% stake in the property, Gorsuch secured a profit between $250,001 and $500,000 from the sale.

Politico reported that Gorsuch failed to identify the buyer on his federal disclosure forms and, since the purchase, Greenberg Traurig has been involved in at least 22 cases before or presented to the court. Twelve cases in which Gorsuch's opinion was recorded show that he sided with Greenberg Traurig clients eight times and against them four times.

Related

Senator calls to refer Clarence Thomas to attorney general over "week of silence" from John Roberts

Duffy stated that he does not know Gorsuch personally.

"I've never spoken to him. I've never met him," he told Politico.

Duffy also said that he cleared the property sale with his firm's ethics department upon learning that Gorsuch was a co-owner.

Though members of SCOTUS are not barred from participating in financial dealings with people involved in court decisions, as Politico noted, "Gorsuch's dealings with Duffy expose the weakness of the court's disclosure procedures."

"For instance," the report added, "in reporting his Colorado income, Gorsuch listed as his source only the name that he and his two co-owners gave themselves, Walden Group, LLC. The report didn't indicate that there had been a real estate sale or a purchaser."

The court's critics linked the sale to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' failure to disclose luxury trips, gifts and a real estate deal involving billionaire GOP megadonor Harlan Crow.

"Well, it looks like the disease of corruption and secrecy at the court is contagious," Take Back the Court Action Fund President Sarah Lipton-Lubet said in a statement. "At this point, it's willfully ignorant to believe that self-interested partisans like Thomas and Gorsuch will ever hold themselves accountable. So it's up to our elected leaders to do it. Congress needs to investigate the rot at the center of this Court before the institution is poisoned beyond the point of return."

"Lord it's so blatant," marveled New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie.

"The Roberts Court. A cesspool of corruption," tweeted Norm Ornstein, an Emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Just last month ProPublica released a bombshell report detailing how Thomas and his wife have for over two decades accepted luxury trips and other gifts from Crow. The trips "appeared nowhere on Thomas' financial disclosures."

Following ProPublica's revelation, Thomas took another public hit — the conservative justice repeatedly claimed rental income from a real estate firm that has been out of business since the early 2000s, according to a report from The Washington Post. For the past two decades, Thomas reported income that his family received from a firm called Ginger, Ltd., Partnership — a Nebraska real estate firm started by his wife, Ginni, and her family in 1982 — though the company shuttered in 2006, and was ultimately rolled into a new, separate firm called Ginger Holdings, LLC.

However, since then, Thomas has allegedly continued to claim income — reported as "rent" — from Ginger, Ltd., Partnership, with recent years seeing him report between $50,000 and $100,000 annually, per financial disclosure reports. In sum, he has reported receiving between $270,000 to $750,000 from the firm since 2006.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    last year

Creedy Gorrupt Fother Muckers...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1    last year

"Though members of SCOTUS are not barred from participating in financial dealings with people involved in court decisions, as Politico noted, "Gorsuch's dealings with Duffy expose the weakness of the court's disclosure procedures."

Greedy?? It's just a real estate sale. Perfectly on the up and up.

If you wan to talk about greedy and corrupt, just look at the crooked business deals of the Biden crime family's dealings with our enemy China. .

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

The Bidens would never sell property to a lobbyist for an inflated price, I'll tell you that

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    last year

Why would they bother to sell anything.

Far easier to take in millions from foreign countries for "doing nothing"; and not bother to report it on their taxes. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3  evilone    last year

I don't see this as the problem some Dems are trying to make it out to be. Gorsuch should not have gotten away with leaving that information blank on the form, but this isn't the same as Justice Thomas' issues. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @3    last year

As long as none of it involves issues or entities before the Court, there is nothing wrong with it.

They all do it.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  evilone @3    last year

I agree

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
Duffy also said that he cleared the property sale with his firm's ethics department upon learning that Gorsuch was a co-owner. 

I'm pretty sure if there were an ethics problem, the sale wouldn't have happened.  But don't let that stop the freak out.

 
 

Who is online