╌>

An appeals court reinstates portions of Florida's new election law

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  s  •  last year  •  6 comments

An appeals court reinstates portions of Florida's new election law
DeSantis predicted after Walker's ruling that the state would win the case

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal appeals court granted Florida's request to reinstate portions of the state's election law on Friday while it appeals a lower court's decision that the law   was aimed at suppressing Black voters .

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals said that Judge Mark Walker's March ruling that the law intentionally targeted Black voters was flawed. The three-judge panel said there wasn't evidence that the law was passed with the intent to discriminate, and issued the stay as an appeal continues.






The law  tightens rules on mailed ballots, drop boxes and other popular election methods — changes that made it more difficult for Black voters who, overall, have more socioeconomic disadvantages than white voters, Walker wrote in his ruling.





Florida's Republican-led legislature joined several others around the country in passing election reforms after Republican former President Donald Trump made unfounded claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him. Democrats have called such reforms a partisan attempt to keep some voters from the ballot box.








Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis made the election bill a 2021 priority. The state was immediately sued by voting rights groups.

"We are deeply disappointed and disturbed by today's appeals court decision, putting back in place one of the most restrictive voting rights laws in the country. Let's be clear, this law undoes the progress that voting rights groups have made and targets the very tools minority communities, like ours, use to increase voter turnout," Jasmine Burney-Clark, founder of Equal Ground, said in a news release.





Much of the debate focused on vote-by-mail ballots and how they are collected and returned. Walker overturned a provision of the law limiting when people could use a drop box to submit their ballot, along with a section prohibiting anyone from engaging with people waiting to vote. Walker said the latter provision "discourages groups who give food, water, and other forms of encouragement to voters waiting in long lines from continuing to do so."





DeSantis predicted after Walker's ruling that the state would win the case in front of the more conservative appeals court. Walker was appointed by former President Barack Obama. The three judges that issued the stay were appointed by former President Donald Trump, including Barbara Lagoa, who briefly served on the Florida Supreme Court as a DeSantis appointee.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Sean Treacy    last year

No real surprise. Activist Liberal Judge (who Disney went Forum Shopping for ) got slapped down by the Court of Appeals. 

The Court wrote:

“From the start, the district court erred”

“The district court did not heed our precedent”

“this finding does not withstand even our deferential review.”

“The district court made multiple inferential leaps, some of which were entirely unfounded” 

Ouch. Get ready for more of the same. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Sean Treacy    last year

“district court’s finding based on this evidence does not withstand examination. The district court relied on fatally flawed statistical analyses, out-of-context statements by individual legislators, and legal premises that do not follow our precedents"

Humiliating for a judge to be treated like a failing student. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3  Snuffy    last year

They keep saying it disenfranchises black voters but they don't offer evidence to support it.  Anecdotal stories don't support the claims.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.1  George  replied to  Snuffy @3    last year

That is because they just “know” that minorities aren’t able to comply with the law like non-minorities can, it is the soft racism seen from the democrat party.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  George @3.1    last year

Why are so many on the left prone to lying about laws?

Remember GA.

Remember "Don't Say Gay".

Remember FL voting law.

What is next?

The only thing good about any of it is that every time they post a lie about the law, I just ask for proof of the claim, and people seem to scatter to the four winds.

Never can they actually back the silly claims up with anything even remotely related to a fact.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2  Texan1211  replied to  Snuffy @3    last year
They keep saying it disenfranchises black voters but they don't offer evidence to support it.  Anecdotal stories don't support the claims.

Exactly.

As discriminatory and suppressive as many have like to claim the law is, where is the evidence to support such nonsense claims?

This is just like the left, though, remember what they did after the Georgia law passed.

They have to lie about these things to keep the leftists engaged somehow.

 
 

Who is online


402 visitors