╌>

Gal Luft's Links to Member of Donald Trump Team Revealed in Indictment

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  last year  •  30 comments

By:   Ewan Palmer (Newsweek)

Gal Luft's Links to Member of Donald Trump Team Revealed in Indictment
The man accused of acting as a Chinese agent has connections to former CIA executive James Woolsey, who briefly worked on Trump's 2016 campaign team.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The head of a U.S. think tank who has been charged with acting as an unregistered agent of China was linked to a former top CIA official who worked on Donald Trump's 2016 campaign team, it has been revealed.

Gal Luft is co-director of the Maryland-based Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. He has been charged with allegedly brokering deals involving weapons and Iranian oil with high-ranking U.S government officials without registering as a foreign agent.

Luft was previously believed to be a key figure in House Republicans' probe into the Biden family's alleged corrupt foreign business dealings, although was reported "missing" by GOP figures. Prosecutors have said that Luft was arrested on February 17, but subsequently fled after being released on bail and remains a fugitive.

One of the officials whom Luft is accused of covertly attempting to "recruit and pay, on behalf of principals based in China" was an adviser to the then President-elect Donald Trump, according to a 58-page indictment.

While he is not named in the indictment, the official is believed to be former CIA Director James Woolsey, who was a national security adviser to Trump during the 2016 election, reported the New York Post and The Messenger. Woolsey resigned from Trump's transition team just before the Republican took office at the White House in January 2017. There is no indication that Trump was aware of Luft's alleged offending at the time. Newsweek has contacted Trump's office for comment via email.

Elsewhere in the indictment, prosecutors say that Luft sent an email on September 12, 2016, to a person named only as CC-1, identified by The Washington Post's Aaron Blake as a "now-convicted Chinese oil exec" celebrating that Woolsey had joined Trump's team.

The email had the subject line "We nailed it!" and included a link to an article announcing that Woolsey was advising Trump on security, defense and intelligence.

Read more

  • Hunter Biden probe unravels over missing informant Gal Luft's China ties
  • Trump Allies Call Report of Ray Epps Losing Business, Family 'Propaganda'
  • Who is Gal Luft? Hunter Biden informant charged with acting as China agent

On November 13, 2016, after Trump had defeated Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, Luft and the Chinese oil executive exchanged emails about the potential role Woolsey could have in the new administration.

Luft said that Woolsey was in line for a role with secretary of defense, or secretary of homeland security. In response, the oil executive wrote that "[t]his side would like to see [Woolsey] assuming something with a 'China' profile," while adding that director of national intelligence "would be good." Luft replied that that role for Woolsey is "most likely."

Later in the email chain, CC-1 wrote that "may be you could reserve his 'direct' China link as the weapon of last resort."

Woolsey is listed as an adviser on the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security website. Newsweek has contacted the IAGS for comment via email.

Prosecutors also accuse Luft of working to broker a deal for Chinese companies to provide military weapons and ammunition for Libya, the United Arab Emirates and Kenya.

"Gal Luft, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen and co-head of a Maryland think tank, engaged in multiple, serious criminal schemes," U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in a statement.

"He subverted foreign agent registration laws in the United States to seek to promote Chinese policies by acting through a former high-ranking U.S. Government official; he acted as a broker in deals for dangerous weapons and Iranian oil; and he told multiple lies about his crimes to law enforcement.

"As the charges unsealed today reflect, our Office will continue to work vigorously with our law enforcement partners to detect and hold accountable those who surreptitiously attempt to perpetrate malign foreign influence campaigns here in the United States," Williams added.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    last year

No Shit! So, no wonder the MAGA idiots are so desperately trying to divert from this revelation...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1    last year

Looks like only you here, so who exactly is diverting where and from who?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1    last year

[Deleted]

Many who hooked their right-wing political dreams and fantasies to this one wheeled criminal "whistleblower" wagon are having serious regrets.

Seems every bombshell whistleblower the right comes up with in their attempts to hurt Biden tend to be hollow husks (just like those two disgraced former FBI fascists).

Guess Trump will have to fall back on hoping he can tie Smith to WH coke.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @1.1.1    last year
Removed for context - sandy

Since I am neither of those things, your post is incorrect as the one where you claimed Woolsey and Clinton never even met.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  JBB @1    last year

what? he seems like the typical maga hero type...

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JBB    last year

original

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  JBB @2    last year

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    last year

Woosley was hand picked to run the CIA by bill clinton. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    last year

Woosley and Clinton never even met in person.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.1.1  George  replied to  cjcold @3.1    last year

That comment is a lie.  Here is a picture of Woosley and Clinton together.

256  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @3.1    last year
Woosley and Clinton never even met in person.

Are you in the least bit serious with that claim?

From Wiki:

CIA Director[edit]

220px-Jones-Woolsey-deClarens.gif James Woolsey with Reginald Victor Jones and Jeanne de Clarens (field officer, source of scientific intelligence, captured by Nazis) in 1993.

Relationship with Bill Clinton[edit]

As Director of the CIA, Woolsey had limited access to President Bill Clinton. According to journalist Richard Miniter:

Never once in his two-year tenure did CIA director James Woolsey ever have a one-on-one meeting with Clinton. Even semi-private meetings were rare. They only happened twice. Woolsey told me: "It wasn't that I had a bad relationship with the president. It just didn't exist."[2]

Sure does SOUND like they have met, despite your false claims.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @3.1    last year

Why would you post that which can be debunked with a 5 second internet search?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @3.1    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.5  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.4    last year

I guess I should have said that they never had a private conversation.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @3.1.5    last year
I guess I should have said that they never had a private conversation.

And I suppose you have as much evidence of that as you did your original false claim?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.1.7  George  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.6    last year

So they are saying that Clinton appointed a director of the CIA without having a conversation with him, That level of incompetence is expected from Biden but Clinton would have been more on the ball than that one would think. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  George @3.1.7    last year

So they are saying that Clinton appointed a director of the CIA without having a conversation with him, That level of incompetence is expected from Biden but Clinton would have been more on the ball than that one would think. 

All pretty un-fucking-believable.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    last year
Woosley was hand picked to run the CIA by bill clinton.

That is so but Clinton felt there was a need for a neoconservative and Woolsey fit.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Hallux @3.2    last year
That is so but Clinton felt there was a need for a neoconservative and Woolsey fit.

Clinton needed someone to blame when things go wrong.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Hallux  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.1    last year

Do digress.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Hallux @3.2.2    last year

No more than you did.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    last year

Why am I being indicted … for ghostwriting an innocuous article for which I received no payment, let alone from a foreign government, when the mother of all FARA cases, the Bidens’ systemic influence-peddling on behalf of foreign governments, for which they raked [in] millions, goes unpunished?”

gal luft

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    last year

he's not a credible witness.  Keep trying though, maybe one day you'll land on something.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

Do you think people who have received plea deals to testify against Trump are credible?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    last year

It seems like no one can explain how and why Comer fucked up again.  We get just another deluge of things like "what about Clinton?"

Folks, it's embarrassing.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year
Folks, it's embarrassing.

What's embarrassing is the attempt to tie this to Trump through Woolsey, when he was an actual appointee of Bill Clinton.

Do you not see how ham handed and idiotic this whole seed is?  

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year

Hillary Clinton stole Luft’s evidence and hid it with her emails.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.2    last year

Maybe they stashed them with the Great Meuller Report and the Steele Dossier. 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6  bbl-1    last year

Trump is being protected at all costs. It also seems that all of the protections are ending up being a lie, a fraud or yet another deflection.  

The only question I have is what is it about Trump that makes so many crawl out on shakey limbs for the man?  This latest thing with 'the Luft dude' is an indication of---there is a whole lot more we don't know than what we do.  A Chinese agent.  Really?

 
 

Who is online




515 visitors