╌>

Merrick Garland's Hunter Biden lies blown up by IRS whistleblowers

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  texan1211  •  8 months ago  •  6 comments

By:   Post Editorial Board (New York Post)

Merrick Garland's Hunter Biden lies blown up by IRS whistleblowers
Attorney General Merrick Garland swears that US Attorney David Weiss was in fact the top dog when it came to charging First Son Hunter Biden.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Post Editorial Board

Thanks for contacting us. We've received your submission.

Back to Reading Published Sep. 22, 2023, 4:02 p.m. ET

US Attorney General Merrick Garland swears (literally: in sworn testimony) that US Attorney David Weiss was in fact the top dog when it came to charging ne'er do well First Son Hunter Biden — yet senior feds keep blowing up his claims: Two more IRS professionals have now contradicted him.

Garland repeated his claim at a Wednesday hearing before the House Judiciary Committee,saying that "no one had the authority to turn him down," of Weiss' alleged power to bring whatever charges the evidence justified against Hunter.

He added that Weiss "had the authority because I promised he would have the authority."

Yet Garland immediately contradicted himself, saying others in Justice "could refuse to partner with" Weiss.

And IRS Director of Field Operations Michael Batdorf and DC IRS Special Agent in Charge Darrell Waldon — both vets of the tax agency — added even more wrinkles.

"My understanding is that . . . he can't make that [charging] decision without DOJ Tax authorization," Batdorf said of Weiss in an earlier hearing — recalling a meet where DOJ tax muckamucks gave static about charging the first son.

Attorney General Merrick Garland swears that US Attorney David Weiss was in fact the top dog when it came to charging first son Hunter Biden.Shutterstock

Batdorf also OK'd felony charges against Hunter for actions dating back to 2014, including related to his service on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma — charges that Weiss still couldn't manage to bring before the statute of limitations passed, because someone else wouldn't sign off.

Funny how such timing issues keep playing out to protect the Bidens.

Waldon said, re: Weiss's alleged powers, "There was processes that Mr. Weiss would have to work out with the Department of Justice."

Sure doesn't sound like actually being in charge to us.

And it goes a looooong way to explain how in the heck Weiss' office came up with a bonkers plea deal for Hunter that would have had him cop only to far fewer and lesser charges and get a basically lifetime free pass for any related crookery.

Garland appointed Weiss special counsel for the Hunter affair, giving him actual full-stop authority, only recently — long after the lack of it compromised any prosecution in exactly the ways Garland had testified wouldn't happen.

This, to any rational person, looked like a smokescreen to please the prez.

And lo and behold, Garland said Wednesday he can't comment on any details about Hunter because of the "ongoing" investigation — using the special-counsel probe as a shield.

He also straight-up refused to answer whether he's had discussions with Weiss about the Hunter case.

At this point, there's enough smoke (and sufficient sweaty squirming from Garland) that the American people would be more than right to scream fire.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Texan1211    8 months ago

I hope that Garland is brought before Congress on charges of perjury.

He is an outright liar or incredibly inept.

He needs to go.

His abject failure to appoint a special prosecutor from the get go is appalling.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Texan1211    8 months ago
He also straight-up refused to answer whether he's had discussions with Weiss about the Hunter case.

Why?????????????????????????????????????????????

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @2    8 months ago

Impossible to justify intentionally letting Hunter Biden walk on hundreds of thousands of he owed the IRS 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1    8 months ago
Impossible to justify intentionally letting Hunter Biden walk on hundreds of thousands of he owed the IRS 

Well, I do believe that Hunter's sugar bro paid his back taxes.

Say, I wonder if Hunter declared the gift?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    8 months ago

I wonder what Joe Biden did for Hunter's sugar bro?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    8 months ago
ell, I do believe that Hunter's sugar bro paid his back taxes

His sugar bro only paid the back taxes on 2017 and 2018.  Some of his Burisma income was never taxed  from 2014 and 2015 ( he lied and claimed it was  a loan) and now he faces no penalty for not paying, because the DOJ let the SOL run despite having evidence of his fraud. 

The Democrats, supposedly the party against income inequality, are cheering on a millionaire being allowed to skate on taxes he legally owed.  

 
 

Who is online


bugsy
afrayedknot
CB
cjcold


29 visitors