╌>

Jordan Reverses Himself and Will Push for a Third Speaker Vote

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  last year  •  14 comments

By:   Luke Broadwater and Annie Karni - NYT

Jordan Reverses Himself and Will Push for a Third Speaker Vote
Hours after saying he would endorse empowering an interim speaker, the hard-right Republican from Ohio reversed himself and said he would pursue another vote in his bid for speaker.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


In a day of whiplash and uncertainty on Capitol Hill, Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio said Thursday he would push for another vote to become speaker, even in the face of a growing bloc of Republican opposition.

Just hours after the hard-right Republican said he would hit pause on his candidacy and support elevating the interim speaker, Representative Patrick T. McHenry of North Carolina, to temporarily lead the House, Mr. Jordan reversed course yet again and said he would move forward with his bid to win the post. It was not immediately clear when another vote could be scheduled.

His decision came after a furious backlash from rank-and-file Republicans including many of his far-right supporters, who said empowering Mr. McHenry — a stand-in appointed to his post after the ouster of then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy — would effectively cede control of the House floor to Democrats and set a bad precedent.

It was the latest abrupt turn in a Republican speaker drama that has played out for more than two weeks, underscoring the depth of the party’s divisions and disarray. Unable to unite behind a candidate to lead them, the G.O.P. now can’t even agree on a temporary solution to allow the paralyzed House to function while they sort out their differences.

After falling short in two consecutive votes for speaker, Mr. Jordan, the hard-line co-founder of the House Freedom Caucus and a favorite of former President Donald J. Trump, had told members during a closed-door meeting on Thursday morning that he did not plan to force a third vote right away. His candidacy has run headlong into opposition from a bloc of mainstream G.O.P. holdouts, and he appeared to be losing more ground with each vote.

Instead, he said he would back a plan floated by some centrist Republicans and Democrats to explicitly empower Mr. McHenry — whose role is primarily to hold an election for a permanent one —   to conduct legislative work   through Jan. 3.

But during a contentious closed-door meeting of Republicans, his backers demanded he fight on.

“We made the pitch to members on the resolution as the way to lower the temperature and get back to work,” Mr. Jordan said. “We decided that wasn’t where were going to go. I’m still running for speaker. I plan to go to the floor and get the votes and win this race.”



He said he wanted to speak with the 22 Republicans who opposed his nomination on Wednesday before scheduling a third vote.

The idea was met with intense backlash during a raucous closed-door meeting of House Republicans with several members emerging and declaring the proposal dead on arrival. Some members waived pocket-size copies of the U.S. Constitution and suggested the plan violated the country’s founding principles.




“Just reading the room, I think it’s dead,” said Representative Vern Buchanan of Florida.




Tempers at the meeting ran hot as members aired grievances and lamented the chaotic state of the chamber.

Mr. McHenry holds the position of speaker pro tempore under a House rule instituted after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It requires that the speaker secretly prepare a list of lawmakers to temporarily assume the post in the event that it should suddenly become vacant. The ouster of Speaker Kevin McCarthy this month activated the rule for the first time, and Mr. McHenry, a close ally of his, was at the top of the list.



But because the situation is without precedent, the scope of an acting speaker’s powers is a matter of dispute. Some lawmakers in both parties believe they should eliminate any uncertainty by passing a resolution to explicitly empower Mr. McHenry to conduct legislative business for a set period of time. They have been discussing doing so through early January, although the timing was a point of debate.

Mr. Jordan’s waffling came after he   fell well short   of the majority he would have needed to be elected speaker on Tuesday, and he was   defeated again   on Wednesday when the number of Republicans refusing to back him grew.

Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio said on Thursday that he was continuing to talk with Republicans to see if any would flip to Mr. Jordan but was finding the divisions in the party too deep. Several members he talked to were still deeply embittered at how some of Mr. Jordan’s supporters forced out Mr. McCarthy and declined to support Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 2 Republican, when he was initially named the party’s choice to succeed Mr. McCarthy.





But the proposal to empower Mr. McHenry angered hard-right Republicans, who condemned the idea as a partnership with Democrats who have been calling for the move. Mr. McHenry negotiated a deal with the White House on the debt limit earlier this year that was opposed by his party’s right wing.


“It’s a giant mistake to give the Democrats control of a Republican majority,” said Representative Jim Banks of Indiana, who backs Mr. Jordan. He added: “What they’re doing right now is walking the Republicans off the plank. We don’t deserve the majority if we go along with a plan to give the Democrats control over the House of Representatives. It’s a giant betrayal to Republicans.”

The roadblock Mr. Jordan has encountered is a rare instance of the party’s more mainstream wing — normally those who seek compromise and conciliation — breaking with their Republican colleagues in defiance of the ultraconservative faction led by Mr. Jordan. It also underscored the seemingly intractable divisions among Republicans — as well as the near-impossible political math — that led to   the ouster of Mr. McCarthy   as speaker two weeks ago and that have so far thwarted the party’s attempts to choose a successor.

As the infighting continues, the House remains without an elected speaker with wars raging in the Middle East and Ukraine. And on the domestic front, Congress faces a mid-November deadline to pass a spending measure in order to avert a government shutdown.





Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    last year

Not a hint of slimy hypocrisy to that boy ...

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Hallux @1    last year

Once…twice…three times a shady…

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    last year

After a couple of more votes, Jordan should just withdraw from the running and let the hardliners figure out the next step.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1  JBB  replied to  Greg Jones @2    last year

A hundred MAGAs cannot elect a Speaker. But, they can cause chaos and mayhem. Which was what they really wanted in the first place...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @2.1    last year
s and mayhem. Which was what they really wanted in the first place

No, that's what the entire democratic caucus wanted when they teamed up with Matt Gaetz to topple the Speaker.  You got what you wanted.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    last year

All I can do is remember when Democrats did something that backfired spectacularly on them.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    last year

The Democrats are holding out for a speaker that's not a Trump knob polisher. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1.4  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    last year
they teamed up with Matt Gaetz to topple the Speaker.

Still sounds like a grimey Grimm fairytale, fortunately my daughter grew up on Oscar Wilde's forays into the field.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @2    last year
let the hardliners figure out the next step.

Dancing lemmings ... I'll watch that.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3  evilone    last year

The populist right wing still runs the party leadership. I can't say I didn't expect this. 

Some members waived pocket-size copies of the U.S. Constitution and suggested the plan violated the country’s founding principles.
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4  JBB    last year

MAGA Y'all! MAGA...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5  Kavika     last year

This is getting more bizarre by the day or by the vote...Three strikes and you're out Jimmy.

 
 
 
Dragon
Freshman Silent
6  Dragon    last year

The House Republicans don't know if they are coming or going, changing their minds as the wind blows. What a farce. And blaming Democrats...that is laugh out loud nonsense!

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
7  afrayedknot    last year

“What a farce”

Nothing to add. 

 
 

Who is online


bccrane
MrFrost
CB


395 visitors