╌>

California's latest insane gender policy takes effect next month

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  texan1211  •  5 months ago  •  12 comments

By:   Gov. Gavin Newsom (Restoring America)

California's latest insane gender policy takes effect next month
Parts of California are so downtrodden that people need to consult "poop maps" to avoid human feces while walking outside, homelessness is rampant in major cities, and the cost of living is out of control. But California's state government thinks now is the time to … regulate Toys "R" Us.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Opinion California's latest insane gender policy takes effect next month ByBrad Polumbo December 09, 2023 06:00 AM

Parts of California are so downtrodden that people need to consult "poop maps" to avoid human feces while walking outside, homelessness is rampant in major cities, and the cost of living is out of control. But California's state government thinks now is the time to … regulate Toys "R" Us.

A law passed by the state legislature and signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) in 2021 is set to take effect in the new year, mandating "gender-neutral" toy sections in large toy retail stores. As the Washington Examiner reported after Newsom signed the bill, "Retail stores that fail to comply with the mandate risk being penalized with $250 fines for initial violations and $500 fines for all subsequent violations."

What grave societal ill were legislators hoping to address?

"Keeping similar items that are traditionally marketed either for girls or for boys separated makes it more difficult for the consumer to compare the products and incorrectly implies that their use by one gender is inappropriate," the legislation says.

The lawmakers who advanced this bill were very clear that gender ideology was driving their decision-making.

"The segregation of toys by a social construct of what is appropriate for which gender is the antithesis of modern thinking," said Assemblyman Evan Low, who sponsored the bill. "We need to stop stigmatizing what's acceptable for certain genders and just let kids be kids."

There are so many problems with this that it's hard to know where to begin.

For one, there's just a question of priorities. With all the problems the state is facing, this is what the California state government is focused on?

Secondly, this regulation is a "solution" to a "problem" that doesn't exist. There are exactly zero people who wake up every day thinking about how the real thing holding back their child's development in life is the fact that some stores have gendered toy sections. And it's not like stores categorize toys this way for anything more than convenience; parents are entirely free to buy their daughter's toys from the boy's section or vice versa.

It used to be considered common sense in America that government intervention in private affairs is only ever justified when there's a real threat to someone's health or safety. But now, the ideology that reigns supreme in California barely blinks twice at inserting the state into the most mundane levels of people's lives.

There's also a potential free speech problem with this new mandate. Companies might be able to challenge this regulation in court and argue that it violates their commercial free speech rights to be forced to participate in California's "gender-neutral" view of childhood development.

What's more, it's yet another regulation and headache layered onto private enterprise in a state that is already one of the most expensive states in which to do business. How many more companies need to relocate out of the Golden State before its government stops piling on?

Yes, in the grand scheme of things, this policy really isn't that big of a deal. But it's a microcosm of everything that's wrong with California and the ideology progressives want to impose on the entire United States.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Texan1211    5 months ago

Well.

Thanks to the California legislature, little Johnny's mother will no longer have to (gasp!) buy his dolls in a section of toys that boys may enjoy.

If that doesn't solve California's most pressing problems, whatever will?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Texan1211    5 months ago
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, this policy really isn't that big of a deal. But it's a microcosm of everything that's wrong with California and the ideology progressives want to impose on the entire United States.

Pretty much sums up the misplaced, idiotic priorities of the Democratic Party.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Texan1211    5 months ago
The lawmakers who advanced this bill were very clear that gender ideology was driving their decision-making.

Oh, thank God they had that to fall back on.

Just imagine the chaos had they relied on their astonishing lack of common sense!

And now we know why California is known as The Land of Fruits and Nuts.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    5 months ago

Ok.  Who ask Democrats if they could increase the stupidity?!

Really, all the problems in this Democrat run shit hole and THIS is what they decide is the most important?  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    5 months ago
Who ask Democrats if they could increase the stupidity?!

No one in their right mind would issue a challenge like that.

Afraid they'd take us up on it and do something even more stupid.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1    5 months ago

They aren't capable in original thought.  Somebody had to make the challenge.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.1    5 months ago

If you continually challenge idiots to see if they can do something even more stupid than the last thing, don't be surprised when they oblige.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
5  afrayedknot    5 months ago

An insignificant, symbolic gesture that has no real bearing on how one negotiates their day.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @5    5 months ago

California didn’t go far enough, they should require stores to offer a child gender free clothes section as well.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1    5 months ago
California didn’t go far enough, they should require stores to offer a child gender free clothes section as well.  

Don't give the idiots in the California legislature any ideas.

They need absolutely no help in coming up with stupid new ideas.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.1    5 months ago

I probably then, shouldn’t give them ideas about gender fluid children sections.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @5    5 months ago
An insignificant, symbolic gesture that has no real bearing on how one negotiates their day.

And yet, California Democrats thought it a necessary piece of legislation, go figure, huh?

What other insignificant symbolic gestures you reckon they'll make next?

 
 

Who is online




47 visitors