Mark Zuckerberg apologizes to parents at online child safety hearing
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Jan. 31, 2024, 5:40 PM UTC / Updated Jan. 31, 2024, 8:55 PM UTCBy Angela Yang
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologized Wednesdayto parents in the audience of a Senate online child safety hearing who say Instagram contributed to their children's suicides or exploitation.
"I'm sorry for everything you've all gone through," Zuckerberg said after Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., pressed him about whether he would apologize to the parents directly. "It's terrible. No one should have to go through the things that your families have suffered."
Lawmakers grilled Zuckerberg and the CEOs of TikTok, Discord, X and Snap at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing called "Big Tech and the Online Child Sexual Exploitation Crisis."
Parents held up photos of their children as senators questioned the CEOs. Many also wore blue ribbons that read "STOP Online Harms! Pass KOSA!" referring to the Kids Online Safety Act, which would create a duty of care for social media companies.
Some of the parents audibly hissed when Zuckerberg entered the hearing room Wednesday. He has faced intense scrutiny and criticism over the years around child safety issues on Meta's platforms.
Zuckerberg's words to the parents at the hearing were not into the microphone, but they were audible on a livestream.
After he apologized, Zuckerberg told parents that "this is why we invest so much and are going to continue doing industry-leading efforts to make sure that no one has to go through the types of things that your families have had to suffer."
Zuckerberg faced perhaps the toughest line of questioning at the hearing, with senators pressing him about nonconsensual sexually explicit images of children on Instagram, drug deaths linked to his social media platforms and an array of other issues.
Meta faces a federal lawsuit from dozens of states alleging that Facebook and Instagram intentionally created "psychologically manipulative" features to keep kids addicted and that it hid internal data that would reveal the platforms' harms to young users.
Questioning Zuckerberg, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., referred to a series of emails Zuckerberg allegedly received from Meta's global affairs director, Nick Clegg.
In one email, Clegg wrote, "We are not on track to succeed for our core well-being topics: problematic use, bullying and harassment connections and SSI," which stands for "suicidal self-injury."
Clegg, a former deputy prime minister of the United Kingdom, wrote in a subsequent email that Meta's ability to ensure safety on its platforms was being hampered by a lack of investment in the efforts.
"Nick Clegg was asking you, pleading with you, for resources to back up the narrative to fulfill the commitments," Blumenthal said. Zuckerberg was not given time to reply.
Soon after, Hawley also pointed to a Wall Street Journal investigation in 2021 that reported that some Meta internal documents showed the company knew Instagram had negative mental health effects on teenagers. Zuckerberg disputed Hawley's referring to those details as "facts" and claimed he was cherry-picking the research.
And in answering a question directed at all the social media executives testifying, Zuckerberg told senators that Meta has 40,000 people working in its trust and safety division.
Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., later questioned the CEOs about a wave of layoffs last year that struck employees in their respective trust and safety departments. Zuckerberg responded that Meta's layoffs were "across the board" and were "not really focused on that area."
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., also pressed the CEOs about their commitments to safety, striking some balance between their humanity and the companies they oversee.
"At the end of the day, I find it hard to believe that any of you people started this business, some of you in your college dorm rooms, for the purposes of creating the evil that is being perpetrated on your platforms," he said. "But I hope that every single waking hour, you're doing everything you can to reduce it."
Tags
Who is online
430 visitors
It was Senator Josh Hawley who shamed Zuckerberg into an apology:
An apology won't be enough. Congress must remove the law that protects social media from lawsuits.
This was one of the two import hearings held by congress yesterday.
Po sites like this would all close if owners were financially liable for any damages suffered by users tied their sites. Only maga-corporations with teams of lawyers could afford all of the resulting litigation!
[deleted]
Who is allowing teenagers on social media? Is it the same people who are in charge of whether their teenagers are mature enough to drive or date?
The company should be doing everything possible to scrub inappropriate content from their website, but the parents/guardians of the teenagers have the most responsibility to gauge whether their child is mature enough to deal with toxic situations and report them back to their parents/guardians. The internet is a dangerous place - not a child's playground.
The websites should have ways for users to report inappropriate content.
The federal government, the FBI and even Homeland Security should be responsible for identifying, arresting and prosecuting child predators.
Bullying? Who is doing the bullying? Classmates? Then, if appropriate should be handled by the proper authorities - in school or courtroom. The media platform can ban the bullies, but it won't change a thing if the kids attend the same school or live in the same community.
Online sites should have guidelines that are enforced to the best of their ability to protect children/teenagers from porn and other inappropriate content. But, overall, I believe it is the duty of the parents/guardians to monitor their child(ren)'s activities on and off of the internet.