╌>

'The Interview': Senator James Lankford on Trying to Solve Immigration - The New York Times

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  2 months ago  •  9 comments

By:   Lulu Garcia-Navarro (nytimes)

'The Interview': Senator James Lankford on Trying to Solve Immigration - The New York Times
The senator discusses how political calculations killed his border bill, the evangelical Christian vote and preparing for life after Trump.

Yes Getrude in Texas, MAGA turned down "Everything the gop has ever wanted from Democrats on immigration", yet turned it all down on orders from Trump. That is a fact Gertrude in Texas. JBB...


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Credit...Devin Oktar Yalkin for The New York Times

The Interview

The Man Who Tried to Solve Immigration for the G.O.P.


author-lulu-navarro-garcia-thumbLarge.png

By Lulu Garcia-Navarro

  • Aug. 10, 2024

At a campaign rally in Georgia late last month, Vice President Kamala Harris spoke to supporters about one of the biggest issues in this election: immigration. She talked up her record as the former attorney general of a border state, and she made a promise that if elected president, she would "bring back the border-security bill that Donald Trump killed" and sign it into law.

The bill she was talking about was negotiated starting late last year by a bipartisan trio of senators, and the Republican in that group was Senator James Lankford, a former Baptist youth minister from Oklahoma. Lankford, who arrived in the House as part of the Tea Party movement in 2011 and became a senator in 2015, clearly has big political ambitions; he's currently running for Senate leadership. And for months, he worked on that immigration bill with Senators Kyrsten Sinema, an independent from Arizona, and Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut. Their negotiation was a rare show of bipartisanship in Congress, and after getting sign-off from both party leaders in the Senate and an endorsement from the White House, the bill looked as if it was going to become law. It would have been the first major piece of bipartisan legislation on immigration in decades.

Listen to the Conversation With James Lankford


The senator discusses how political calculations killed his border bill, the evangelical Christian vote and preparing for life after Trump.

But then Donald Trump came out against it — he didn't want to give President Biden a political win on such a sensitive issue during an election year. And even though the bill contained most of the hard-line policies that the right wanted, it became toxic among Republicans. In the end, only four Republican senators voted for the bill, it tanked and Lankford was left holding the bag.

I wanted to talk to Lankford about his experience working so hard on this bill only to see it fall apart and what that says about the prospect of getting anything bipartisan done in a Republican Party that is beholden to Trump. But we started by talking about his faith, which he told me guides everything he does.

Before you were in politics, you ran the largest Baptist youth camp in the country, Falls Creek. A friend of mine from Oklahoma basically said it's the place everyone goes when they're young. I think when you were elected, something like 40 percent of Republican primary voters in Oklahoma either had gone to Falls Creek or knew someone who did. What role did that organization play in your life? Wow, that's a huge question. I served 22 years in ministry, working with students and their families. So when you work with middle school and high school students, you're dealing with all kinds of trauma that happens in those families. That's what my wife and I did for 22 years, to be able to just love on families and to encourage them. I didn't do anything in politics other than vote. And in 2008 and 2009, we really felt a calling to be able to run for Congress in the central district. I had to go to our state Republican leaders and introduce myself and say: "Hi, my name's James. I'm filing to run for Congress." And they basically pat me on the head and said, "That's nice." But saying all that, my faith is important to me, and it's not something I take off and put on. I tell people all the time, your faith should affect everything about you. It's how I treat my wife. It's how I treat total strangers. I believe every person's created in the image of God. They have value and worth. Even if I disagree with them, that person has value and worth. As I joke with some of my Democrat colleagues, we're friends, but they're wrong all the time. They vote wrong all the time, but we can still be friends in our conversation and relationship and try to be able to engage.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    2 months ago

Do people in Texas get the news anymore? Do they even want to?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2  Split Personality    2 months ago

I get mine from Newstalkers /s

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Split Personality @2    2 months ago

Sorry?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  JBB @2.1    2 months ago

My answer disappeared. jrSmiley_5_smiley_image.png Just as well, the teacher would have flagged it for spelling or something else jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

but there are enough articles published here that just reek so bad that you know the opposite must be almost certainly true.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  JBB  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.1    2 months ago

Yes, considering ongoing denials about the facts herein...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.2  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @2    2 months ago

Thank you Thomas.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    2 months ago

A new bill wasn't needed. All Biden needed to do was restore provisions of the law that existed under Trump. That would have been a win for him and the American people. Biden's intention was to open the border as wide as possible. It was a blatant political stunt to recruit democrat voters.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 months ago
A new bill wasn't needed.

Of course it was. The judicial branch of immigration has 2 million cases backlogged, which was exacerbated by the courts closures during Covid. There is up to 6 years wait to come to a conclusion while these people wander the country, marrying and making more American babies and complicating their potential apprehension and removal.

There have never been enough Judges and court officers to make approving or denying immigrants cases either fast or efficient.

“The border security bill will put a huge number of new enforcement tools in the hands of a future administration and push the current Administration to finally stop the illegal flow. The bill provides funding to build the wall, increase technology at the border, and add more detention beds, more agents, and more deportation flights. The border security bill ends the abuse of parole on our southwest border that has waived in over a million people. It dramatically changes our ambiguous asylum laws by conducting fast screenings at a higher standard of evidence, limited appeals, and fast deportation. 

“New bars to asylum eligibility will stop the criminal cartels from exploiting our currently weak immigration laws. The bill also has new emergency authorities to shut down the border when the border is overrun, new hiring authorities to quickly increase officers, and new hearing authorities to quickly apply consequences for illegal crossings. It changes our border from catch and release to detain and deport.

“Our immigration laws have been weak for years. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to close our open border and give future administrations the effective tools they need to stop the border chaos and protect our nation.”

Lankford Releases Border Security Package With Huge Wins for Securing the Border - Senator James Lankford (senate.gov)

Facts.

Biden's intention was to open the border as wide as possible. It was a blatant political stunt to recruit democrat voters.

Partisan fantasies.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.2  seeder  JBB  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 months ago

None of what you say you want is remotely possible without the legislation, the appropriated dollars, the manpower and the infrastructure required. Congress Must Act!

 
 

Who is online


Drinker of the Wry


418 visitors