╌>

21 Minutes in the Buttigieg Bubble

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  one month ago  •  30 comments

By:   Mark Leibovich - The Atlantic

21 Minutes in the Buttigieg Bubble

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


“Okay, we have to move fast,” one of Pete Buttigieg’s aides told me as the discoursing dynamo was finishing another cable interview on the last day of the Democratic National Convention.

Buttigieg stepped off an MSNBC set and onto the United Center floor. “I’m here to give you some much-needed attention,” I told him. By “much-needed,” I was of course being sarcastic: Buttigieg has been a rather relentless media presence in recent weeks, especially this past one in Chicago.

Buttigieg did not respond to my greeting, probably because at least 10 other people were trying to get his attention at the same time: his staff and security people telling him where to go; delegates shouting, “We love you, Pete!”; swarms of reporters chasing after him yelling things like “Pete, what does Vice President Harris have to   do   in her speech tonight?” Next thing I knew, Buttigieg was 20 feet ahead of me, darting up a staircase while convention-goers shouted and cheered at him.

Officially, Buttigieg is the United States secretary of transportation. But his far more prominent role of late has been as a sound-bite and surrogate sensation for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz (and at the expense of Donald Trump and J. D. Vance). According to his staff, Buttigieg plowed through more than 30 TV, radio, and TikTok appearances over the course of 96 hours in Chicago, along with 30 speeches to constituent groups (veterans, mayors, students), 12 sets of remarks to delegation breakfasts, dozens of scheduled and unscheduled drop-bys and meet and greets with various dignitaries and appendages, and one prime-time address on Wednesday night.

The next day, in the final hours of the convention, I was granted brief access to the inner swirl of this particular dust cloud.

“Keep moving, keep moving,” someone called out as the entourage wound its way through a clogged concourse area. This was quite an exhilarating and exhausting 60-second interval, for me at least, trying to keep up with the Buttigieg Bubble as it moved through a wall of political-celebrity shrieks and convention chaos.

“Pete, photo, photo!” “Hi, Peeeete!” “Woooooo!”

“Make room, make room! Coming through, coming through!”

“Peeeeete, over here, over here!”

We turned a corner. Buttigieg ducked through an open door, and I was directed to follow him. Suddenly it was just the two of us in a quiet holding space, an oversize closet adorned with chairs and empty soda cans. I was sweating and out of breath. Buttigieg is not a sweating-and-out-of-breath kind of person. Still, he admitted to me, “this is probably the least sleep I’ve had since before the kids started sleeping through the night.” (He and his husband, Chasten, have 3-year-old twins.)

Buttigieg has always been a gifted communicator, but he has become renowned lately for his subspecialty of jumping into pro-Trump media hornet’s nests and delivering tidy, often viral Democratic messages while simultaneously eviscerating his often hostile hosts. “Here’s a sentence I never thought I’d hear myself saying,” he began his convention-stage speech in Chicago. “I’m Pete Buttigieg, and you might recognize me from Fox News.” The crowd responded with an immediate and knowing roar.

Buttigieg emerged from his mother’s womb 42 years ago and was seemingly dropped straight into a political-media scrum. “I remember scampering into the living room in 1988 to hear Jesse Jackson’s convention speech,” he told me, recalling his 6-year-old political-junkie self. He organized   West Wing   watch parties as an undergraduate at Harvard; volunteered or worked for the Al Gore, John Kerry, and Barack Obama presidential campaigns; attended the 2012 convention, in Charlotte; live-blogged the 2016 Indiana primary for   Slate ; and later served as a delegate to the 2016 convention, in Philadelphia. “You know, some people geek out to actual rock stars,” Buttigieg   told me in 2020 . “For me, it was seeing people who I’d only watched on TV.” He singled out the thrill of once getting to meet Donna Brazile, the omnipresent Democratic operative and cable pundit.

Buttigieg is now very much one of those people you watch on TV. “Part of the reason I led with it last night,” he told me, referring to his Fox News line, “is that I’ve been struck by how many people come up to me and the first thing they say is ‘I love seeing you on Fox News.’” It happens on the street and in airports, he said, and usually with Democrats.

“Sometimes I might say the same thing on Fox as I might say on another network, but it’s more exciting for people to hear me say it on Fox,” Buttigieg continued. “Part of it is the knowledge that the viewers on Fox will not have heard that thing said before.” He said he tries to avoid hard-core Trump-loving hosts such as Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Jesse Watters. “To the extent that there’s a distinction between the news side and the opinion side—and that has grown fuzzier over time—I will try to engage on the news side,” Buttigieg told me. He does his best to coordinate his media regimen with the Harris-Walz campaign but also enjoys a fair amount of autonomy. “But I don’t want to overstate how much strategy goes into this,” he said.

Although Harris decided against naming Buttigieg as her running mate, his stint as an elite TV asset will continue at least through Election Day. He has been mentioned in connection with big jobs in a potential Harris-Walz administration (most often ambassador to the United Nations), and his continued media flexes should only enhance his candidacy, not to mention his fame.

Buttigieg gave up any claim to anonymity years ago, but attending his first in-person convention as a political star has been a bit disorienting. It might be fun, he told me, to wander unrecognized through the arena and take in the spectacle as the political gawker he’s always been, maybe even catch a glimpse of Brazile. “I don’t know, maybe I could do that Mike Lindell thing, walk around in disguise for a bit,” he mused. (Lindell, the MAGA-loving My Pillow guy, had  apparently  donned a fedora, shaved his mustache, and infiltrated the convention.)

Alas, there was no disguise now, just a bustling retinue on a tight schedule. Time to dash, an aide told me. I thanked the secretary for his time—14 minutes in a little storage room, 21 minutes total inside the Buttigieg Bubble. “I’m following you out,” I informed him as he headed to the door.

“Get some color?” Buttigieg replied, media-savvy as ever.

Yes, I would be seeking some “color,” I confirmed. “Do something colorful,” I commanded.

“I’ll be colorful,” he assured me. “Are you coming in the bubble?”

Before I could answer, Buttigieg was in full motion, and I was suddenly trailing several feet behind as we proceeded again through the concourse.

He stopped for about 20 seconds to say hi to the Reverend Al Sharpton, and for about 30 seconds to pose for a photo with a little kid. I tried to move closer to hear their conversation but was promptly stampeded by a couple of cameramen.

By the time I reoriented myself, the bubble had moved on, and Buttigieg was out of sight—but never for long.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    one month ago

Hang in there Pete, the Gods if they still have any smarts may eventually pave your way to the Resolute desk.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2  devangelical    one month ago

all the FOX bimbos he deconstructs in prime time want a shot at converting him afterwards...

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @2    one month ago

I'm surprised they keep inviting him, must be some form of MAGA self flagellation.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @2.1    one month ago

the same kind of masochistic mental-gunslinger drama plays out here every day...

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @2.1.1    one month ago

Keeps them off the streets.

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
2.1.3  Thomas  replied to  Hallux @2.1    one month ago

it is "the booking manager has a crush on him", that's my rumor

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     one month ago

Love to watch him being interviewed by Fox. Fox has yet to figure out that they were outfoxed once again.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    one month ago

Pete is remarkable.   I hope Harris gives him major responsibility.    Something that will further prepare him for the presidency.   Secretary of State would be perfect for his resume, but I do not believe he has the qualifications for that job.   He would probably do an excellent job nonetheless.   Maybe Secretary of Commerce or Treasury.

Ideally, he would be elected Governor but given his home state is Indiana that is not very likely.

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
4.1  Thomas  replied to  TᵢG @4    one month ago

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @4    one month ago
Pete is remarkable. 

He should have run in the primary against Harris.

Oh, w-a-i-t  a minute.

Never mind.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.1  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    one month ago

Yes one of the many feeble points made by Trump supporters.   It is nice, though, that settled matters that are widely supported by the Ds and many independents are the best Trump supporters can come up with.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.1    one month ago

[]

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.3  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.2    one month ago
Have Trump supporters been pointing it out, too?

Who would you prefer to see win the presidency:  Harris or Trump?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.3    one month ago
Who would you prefer to see win the presidency:  Harris or Trump?

I could answer yet again, but I see absolutely no point in it.

I could say I have no preference, in which case you will tell me that is impossible and that I can see no difference between the two and tell me what a scoundrel Trump is as if I have never known that.

I could say Trump and elate all the folks who erroneously and famously keep thinking I am voting for him.

I could say Harris and lie through my teeth.

I'll let you guess.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.5  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.4    one month ago
I'll let you guess.

I know.   Most everyone on this forum likely knows.   It is obvious.

It is interesting watching you continually attempt to portray yourself as believing there is no difference to the nation regardless of which of those two becomes PotUS.    It is a ridiculous notion that these two are identical.   No two candidates are ever identical and in this case the differences are profound.

I could say Harris and lie through my teeth.

You did not include a: "I could say Trump and lie through my teeth".

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.5    one month ago
I know.   Most everyone on this forum likely knows.   It is obvious.

You 'know'. Okay, then no point in ever asking that question again. Any other instances would be mere trolling.

It is interesting watching you continually attempt to portray yourself as believing there is no difference to the nation regardless of which of those two becomes PotUS.    It is a ridiculous notion that these two are identical.   No two candidates are ever identical and in this case the differences are profound.

I can't and won't even attempt to argue or defend positions you have invented and pretend I hold. You don't need me for that.

You did not include a: "I could say Trump and lie through my teeth".

No, and I didn't say that about around 330 million other Americans, too. So what?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.7  bugsy  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.4    one month ago

I could answer yet again, but I see absolutely no point in it.’
You mean you don’t like the wash/rinse/repeat
strategy?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.2.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    one month ago

So much for preserving and protecting democracy.  But that was bs from the start.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.9  Texan1211  replied to  bugsy @4.2.7    one month ago

I do not.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.10  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.8    one month ago

No comment, for obvious reasons.

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
4.3  Thomas  replied to  TᵢG @4    one month ago
Pete is remarkable.

I agree. He is erudite and expressive.

I hope Harris gives him major responsibility.

He does a wonderful job of 'splainin' things. I know that everyone is going to think this a downgrade, but I think that he would make the best Press Secretary. I know, I know. how can I say such a thing, and I can't imagine him accepting such a position, but I have the greatest respect for press secretaries. Well, at least the ones since 2020, and especially for the latest one. I will give her Kudos all day long. She has to stand in front and take it, but she can give it back as well. And so can Pete. 

 Secretary of State would be perfect for his resume, but I do not believe he has the qualifications for that job.   He would probably do an excellent job nonetheless.

'xactly. He's a good splainer. Which basically means that he has a raised ability to make himself useful to the campaign and to a Harris administration in whatever capacity they decide.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.1  TᵢG  replied to  Thomas @4.3    one month ago

He would be an excellent press secretary.    But, as you clearly know, that is not a path to the presidency.

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
4.3.2  Thomas  replied to  TᵢG @4.3.1    one month ago

Press Secretaries get no respect.....

 ...that is not a path to the presidency.

Not yet...

jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.3.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @4.3.1    one month ago
But, as you clearly know, that is not a path to the presidency.

With the democrats, that path includes being a DEI hire.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.3.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Thomas @4.3.2    one month ago

Not gonna happen with this guy. There are countries that would refuse his passage.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.3.5  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.3.3    one month ago

Being an honored veteran, experienced leader and a role model for living his best life as a father and husband isn't enough?

Because he is gay? What is your point?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.3.6  JBB  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.3.4    one month ago

Countries that would toss him off a tower!

Fuck Them! 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.3.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @4.3.5    one month ago

So being a DEI hire is now a bad thing?  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.3.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @4.3.6    one month ago
Countries that would toss him off a tower!

That's not what he said.  FFS pay attention to what is actually said.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.9  Texan1211  replied to  Thomas @4.3    one month ago

Pete may be very adept at interpreting Kamala's word salads so that the masses can learn wtf she is saying.

 
 

Who is online





427 visitors