╌>

Trump administration removes ban on 'segregated facilities' in federal contracts | Reuters

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  2 weeks ago  •  11 comments

By:   Kanishka Singh (Reuters)

Trump administration removes ban on 'segregated facilities' in federal contracts | Reuters
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has removed an explicit ban on "segregated facilities" like waiting rooms, restaurants and drinking fountains for federal contractors, a memo issued by the U.S. General Services Administration showed.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
Since taking office on January 20, Trump has taken multiple steps aimed at dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal government and private sector.In one such executive order, Trump revoked executive policies dating as far back as 1965 on equal employment opportunities, environmental actions designed to protect communities of color, and "workforce balancing" efforts by federal contractors based on race, gender and religion.The 1965 action aimed to end discriminatory practices in hiring and employment on the part of U.S. government contractors.The February 15 memo said it was making changes prompted by that executive order from Trump.
KEY QUOTE
The memo stated, opens new tab that "when issuing new solicitations or contracts," civil agencies should no longer include the provision and clause about the "Prohibition of Segregated Facilities."
WHAT THEY ARE SAYING
Federal and state laws still outlaw discrimination and segregation and while the memo's step was symbolic, civil rights advocates noted it as part of a trend with Trump's policymaking.They said that any step that may give the perception of turning back the clock on racial segregation was not welcome."While segregation is still illegal, this change sends a CLEAR message," civil rights attorney Ben Crump said.
CONTEXT
Rights advocates say measures Trump is trying to dismantle aimed to uplift marginalized groups and addressed the

visit seeded article for remaining content

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 weeks ago
The memo stated, opens new tab that "when issuing new solicitations or contracts," civil agencies should no longer include the provision and clause about the "Prohibition of Segregated Facilities."

I dont think this means we are going to start seeing separate drinking fountains for whites and "coloreds" in the offices of government contractors. That is still against the law.  But this is Trump demonstrating solidarity with the people who would like to have such an arrangement back. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    2 weeks ago

www.independent.co.uk   /news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-executive-order-segregation-federal-contractors-b2717572.html

Trump executive order rescinds ban on ‘segregated’ facilities for federal contractors, conflicting with federal law

Graig Graziosi 5-6 minutes   3/19/2025


Donald Trump   has overturned an   executive order   signed by   Lyndon B Johnson   in 1965 to jettison a requirement that   federal contractors   must enforce rules against   segregation in their workplaces .

The   General Services Administration   last month issued a memo to all federal agencies pointing out that Trump’s order no longer requires businesses paid with taxpayer dollars in contracts to ensure they won’t have facilities like segregated dining areas for Black and white employees.

State and federal laws still outlaw segregation in all companies, including government contractors, but New York University constitutional law professor Melissa Murray   told NPR   that Trump’s message in lifting the ban is significant and disturbing.

"It's symbolic, but it's incredibly meaningful in its symbolism," she said, noting that the changes conflict with laws established by the government in the 1950s and 1960s "that led to integration."

The “fact that they are now excluding those provisions from the requirements for federal contractors speaks volumes," Murray told NPR.

1705c696a2da5964a7ba2ed612005b78Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaGFwaSwxNzQyNDA3NjY2-2.79211147.jpg

President Donald Trump has jettisoned an executive order signed in 1965 that banned segregation in the workplaces of federal contractors  (PA Wire)

Under the   Federal Acquisition Regulation   — a set of rules used by federal agencies to write contracts between the government and contractors — a clause required any company receiving a contract to maintain integrated workplaces.

"The Contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained,"   clause 52.222-21   of the regulation says.

Under the regulation, integrated facilities are defined as work areas, drinking fountains, transportation, housing, restaurants, and other areas that do not segregate based on "race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin."

The ACLU   condemned the move , saying the executive order "is not only undoing decades of federal anti-discrimination policy, spanning Democratic and Republican presidential administrations alike, but also marshaling federal enforcement agencies to bully both private and government entities into abandoning legal efforts to promote equity and remedy systemic discrimination."

GettyImages-3420466.jpeg

The ACLU condemned the move, saying the executive order "is not only undoing decades of federal anti-discrimination policy, spanning Democratic and Republican presidential administrations alike, but also marshaling federal enforcement agencies to bully both private and government entities into abandoning legal efforts to promote equity and remedy systemic discrimination."  (Getty Images)

Trump’s executive orders “undermine obligations dating back to the Johnson administration that firms doing business with the U.S. government and receiving billions in public dollars are held to the highest standards in remedying and preventing bias," the ACLU added.

The Department of Commerce, the Department of Homeland Security, and the National Institutes of Health have reportedly already notified staff overseeing federal contracts that they should begin instituting the changes outlined in Trump's executive order.

"FAR 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities and FAR 52.222-26 — Equal Opportunity will not be considered when making award decisions or enforce requirements," stated a recent notice sent by the National Institutes of Health.

At present, all businesses operating in the United States are still subject to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Trump's executive order stands in conflict with that and state laws requiring integration, meaning any challenge between the two would likely have to be settled in court.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 weeks ago

The law still trumps an old, meaningless provision of an  executive order.

this seed is the perfect example of left wing media taking advantage of their gullible base to whip up anger over nothing.  There is zero practical effect to this, 

 
 
 
George
Senior Expert
2.1.1  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1    2 weeks ago

But TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    2 weeks ago
 Trump’s order no longer requires businesses paid with taxpayer dollars in contracts to ensure they won’t have facilities like segregated dining areas for Black and white employees.

The right will say this is meaningless because explicit segregation is illegal.   

Then why did Trump give the order removing the language? 

It is a matter of "principle" with him.  Many conservatives opposed the Civil Rights Act, and they or their descendants still do.  Just because they lost that fight doesnt mean that they dont appreciate the president dog whistling them. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 weeks ago

Trump is not racist if that is what you are implying.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.1  evilone  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    2 weeks ago
Trump is not racist if that is what you are implying.

Of course Trump isn't racist. He just says racist things. /s

 
 
 
George
Senior Expert
3.1.2  George  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    2 weeks ago

Can you imagine? someone who thinks people of color don't need protection and that they are equals who don't need HELP to get ahead and are able to compete equally with white people?  definitely not a democrat position.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.3  bugsy  replied to  evilone @3.1.1    2 weeks ago

Can you show proof of something ACTUALLY racist?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.4  evilone  replied to  bugsy @3.1.3    2 weeks ago

The whole birther thing wasn't enough for you? Doing nothing else with my time it would take me a day or two to compile a comprehensive list of all the this racist and bigoted shit Trump has said. 

 
 
 
George
Senior Expert
3.1.5  George  replied to  evilone @3.1.4    2 weeks ago
The whole birther thing wasn't enough for you?

which one? Obama or McCain?

McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out - The New York Times

Is John McCain a natural-born citizen of the U.S.? | Snopes.com

John McCain's Presidential Eligibility - FactCheck.org

McCain's Canal Zone Birthplace Raises Eligibility Questions | HuffPost Latest News

You would have to be a progressive democrat to think another presidential candidate should be treated different solely based on skin color.

 
 

Who is online

Tacos!
Gazoo


49 visitors