Meet MAGA’s Favorite Communist
Category: News & Politics
Via: hallux • 23 hours ago • 10 commentsBy: Kevin T. Dugan - WSJ


Christopher Rufo is perhaps the most potent conservative activist in the U.S. Last year, he led the campaign that pressured Harvard University into replacing Claudine Gay as its president. His crusades against critical race theory and DEI in higher education have shaped President Trump’s aggressive policies toward elite universities like Harvard, which the administration targeted this week with a $2.26 billion funding freeze.
For the past year, Rufo has been working on a book called “How the Regime Rules,” which he describes as a “manifesto for the New Right.” At its core is a surprising inspiration: the Italian Communist thinker Antonio Gramsci, a longtime boogeyman of American conservatives. “Gramsci, in a sense, provides the diagram of how politics works and the relationship between all of the various component parts: intellectuals, institutions, laws, culture, folklore,” said Rufo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Gramsci died in 1937, but he can be seen as the godfather of today’s culture wars. A dedicated opponent of Italy’s fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, he spent most of his last decade in prison, where he developed a highly influential new way of thinking about politics that put culture, rather than economics, at the center of the class struggle.
In his “Prison Notebooks,” Gramsci reckoned with why so much of the Italian working class supported Mussolini’s far-right Fascist party, exactly the opposite of what Marxist economic theory predicted. He found the answer in what he called “cultural hegemony,” a form of power that convinced ordinary people to embrace ideas and policies they otherwise wouldn’t support.
Gramsci “offers a way to think about how intellectual and moral legitimacy are maintained and enforced through cultural practices, which is useful,” said Jonathan Keeperman, the founder and managing editor of Passage Press, which publishes books by writers on the far right.
In particular, Gramsci stressed the importance of universities in shaping culture. That makes him a model for American conservatives in their “fight against critical race theory, against trans ideology, against captured higher education institutions, against DEI,” Rufo believes.
The right’s struggle against what it sees as left-wing cultural hegemony has become increasingly central to President Trump’s education policy. During the first Trump administration, Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos focused on less ideological issues such as supporting charter schools and dialing back investigations into for-profit colleges.
Now her successor Linda McMahon is gutting the Education Department, laying off half its employees and ordering its closure. Universities have scrubbed DEI initiatives from their websites, for fear of having their government funding choked off. Columbia University, the epicenter of pro-Palestinian protests, was denied $400 million in federal funds and has agreed to put its Middle Eastern Studies department under academic receivership. Some 60 other schools are now facing similar threats.
The White House’s agenda isn’t limited to universities. It has also asked Congress to rescind funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds PBS and NPR, news outlets the administration views as too liberal. Similarly, Gramsci attacked the Italian journalists of his day as mouthpieces for the powers that be, which in his case meant Mussolini and the Roman Catholic Church.
There are clear similarities between Gramsci’s political world and our own. When he was writing in the 1920s and ‘30s, massive technological, political and cultural changes were destabilizing governments all over the world, leaving the global power balance in flux. “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born,” Gramsci wrote of his period, which he called the “interregnum.”
Today, the world struggling to be born looks like a mirror image of what Gramsci had in mind. “Few figures seem less amenable to appropriation by the Right than Antonio Gramsci,” wrote a group of scholars in “World of the Right: Radical Conservatism and Global Order,” a book published last year by Cambridge University Press. Yet right-wing figures such as Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, France’s Marine Le Pen and Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro have all cited his influence.
Javier Milei , the right-wing, libertarian president of Argentina, told Tucker Carlson in a 2023 interview that he had to “wage a culture war every single day” because his left-wing opponents “have no problem with getting inside the state and employing Gramsci’s techniques: seducing the artists, seducing the culture, seducing the media or meddling in educational content.”
In the U.S., the Italian thinker’s influence grew more slowly. Gramsci’s name appears in the writing of paleoconservative thinkers Paul Gottfried, Thomas Fleming and Sam Francis, who influenced Pat Buchanan’s Republican presidential bids in the 1990s. One of Gramsci’s biggest proponents in the pre-Trump era was Andrew Breitbart, the founder of Breitbart News, who quoted his axiom that “politics is downstream of culture.”
More recently, far-right writers like Curtis Yarvin, who’s influenced Vice President JD Vance , have talked about how to capture power through a culture war. “This war is not fought with bombs and bullets, or even laws and judges,” Yarvin wrote in 2022. “This war is fought with books and films and plays and poems. It is still a savage war!”
For Rufo, who in March won the Bradley Prize for his writing and influence in conservative ideas, this strategy has already yielded a handful of successes, and he plans to continue it. “I think that the work that I’ve done over the last five years vindicates the general approach and has become the dominant approach of the political right and the Trump administration itself,” he said.
“The right needs a Gramsci,” Rufo added, “and my own ambition is to serve in a similar capacity, an architect of the new right politics.”
If you use your enemy's methods you become them.
speak to your enemies in a language they understand best ...
What language would that be?
At least some are admitting that THE LEFT WAS SUCCESSFUL IN TAKING OVER OUR INSTITUTIONS.
Thank you.
I suspected you would not understand.
Yes, rufo believes in employing progressives’ tactics against progressives. He, much like most progressives, is an ends justify the means type guy.
"eye for an eye"
Yes, we've noticed that the leftists have doubled down on the use of violence.
The bad news for them is that the DOJ and FBI will now prosecute bad actors, something Biden didn't do
Fitting on the 50th anniversary of many progressives celebrating the capture of Phnom Penh by the Khmer Rouge, ushering in the murder of millions.
The double standard conservatives live by truly is stunning.
If this last January 6th when congress was certifying the election for Trump, if Harris supporters had attacked the capital, if we saw EXACTLY the same footage as we did from 2021 but the flags being flown were all pro-Harris and pro-Democrat flags and they broke into the capital building and were beating capital police officers with flag poles, what might the Trump supporting conservatives think should be done with those violent insurrectionists? I've no doubt having listened to them for years that they would be screaming in rage demanding every one of them be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law regardless of whether any of them were claiming voter fraud.
As of January 20, 2025, 1,575 people were charged in connection with the January 6 attack. The FBI has estimated that around 2,000 people took part in criminal acts at the event.
So, if it were liberals and progressives who had attacked the capital trying to stop Trump taking office, do you think conservatives would be supporting their pardons? Of course not, the very thought is laughable. Fucking disgusting hypocrites, the lot of them.