╌>

Fox's Charlie Gasparino Explains Why Trump Tariffs Failed

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  last year  •  5 comments

By:   Isaac Schorr (Mediaite)

Fox's Charlie Gasparino Explains Why Trump Tariffs Failed
Fox Business Network's Charlie Gasparino explained why President Donald Trump's tariff gambit failed on air Tuesday morning.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Fox Business Network's Charlie Gasparino explained why President Donald Trump's tariff gambit failed on Tuesday morning, telling Fox News anchors Dana Perino and Bill Hemmer that you just "can't do" what Trump and his economic team "tried to do."

"I do think you have to be a realist here, and the realism is this: you can't do what they try to do with the U.S. economy on trade," began Gasparino. "If you do that, you will get a bond market. And by the way, we look at stocks all day, the bond market is what rebelled and caused this. I don't care what anybody says. You can't sell your debt. Well, guess what? Your budget deficit gaps out. If the bond market shuts down, your paycheck doesn't come to you because your business needs the short-term bond market to basically float bonds to get your money. This is the plumbing of the financial system."

He continued:


And I'll tell you that day after Liberation Day, I was at a restaurant sitting there with a drink in my hand, and I'm looking at my phone, and every major bond investor was telling me this is insane. Yields were starting to spike through the roof. The 10-year yield, remember, that's the most important one. The reason why? Every consumer rate is pegged off that. If that starts gapping out to 4.5 — we're at 4.4 now, you got to check the chart — but the five where it was heading that night? Oh, we're in deep trouble.

Gasparino's commentary came one day after the U.S. reached a temporary trade truce with China that compelled the commentator to conclude that "Trump raised tariffs on the world, the markets, particularly the bond market — which we need to finance our debt-rebelled. Trump then was forced to back off. End of story. Film at 11 of the president spinning this as a major victory."

Watch above via Fox News.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
"Trump raised tariffs on the world, the markets, particularly the bond market — which we need to finance our debt-rebelled. Trump then was forced to back off. End of story. 
 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

No John, they didn't fail. They did what Trump intended for them to do, which was to bring other nations to the bargaining table to start negotiations for a better deal for both sides. And it has worked.

He even got China to start acting in its own best interests since their economy is not all that great. Hopefully the 90 day freeze will lead to further talks that will do even more to level the playing field.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
2  Just Jim NC TttH    last year

Because no one in the world goes into negotiations high for a starting point............/S

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
3  Gsquared    last year
Liberation Day

I was in Amsterdam one time on Liberation Day.  It's not what Trump pretends it is.

Liberation Day in the Netherlands ( Bevrijdingsdag)   is celebrated on May 5. It commemorates the day the Dutch were liberated   by the Allies   from Nazi occupation.

The   occupation of the Netherlands   by Nazi Germany began on May 10, 1940. Four days later, the city of   Rotterdam was bombed , leading to the surrender of the Dutch command.

It wasn’t until five years later, in 1945, that the country was free again, mostly liberated by Canadian forces. Right after the war, the Dutch decided that May 5 would be celebrated as Liberation Day.

It is really a huge and unforgivable insult to history for Trump to besmirch and degrade a sacred event like Liberation Day to designate the day he started his trade war.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @3    last year

Of course it's an insult but he's unaware of it. He doesn't know diddly squat about history or what happened in WWII, the parties involved, and why.

We have never had such an ignorant piece of shit in the Oval Office

 
 

Who is online


120 visitors