╌>

Trump Fires Back at Musk: 'I'm Very Disappointed in Elon'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  last year  •  59 comments

By:   Joe DePaolo (Mediaite)

Trump Fires Back at Musk: 'I'm Very Disappointed in Elon'
President Donald Trump made his dissatisfaction with Elon Musk clear during a stunning Oval Office press engagement on Thursday.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


President Donald Trump made his dissatisfaction with Elon Musk clear during a stunning Oval Office press engagement on Thursday.

Speaking with reporters alongside the chancellor of Germany, Trump fired back at Musk who has been relentless in his criticism of the "Big, Beautiful" budget bill which is the centerpiece of Trump's 2025 agenda.

"Look, I've always liked Elon," Trump said. "And so I was very surprised. You saw the words he had for me. And he hasn't said anything about me that's bad. I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill because the bill is incredible."

He added, "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore."

Trump made clear to point out the infamous hat Musk donned in the White House which read "Trump Was Right About Everything" and argued that the budget bill is no exception.

"I am right about the great big beautiful bill," Trump said.

The president also suggested self-interest may be a factor for Musk in his criticism of the budget bill — as the legislation does away with subsidies for electric vehicles. Musk, in a post on X responding to the president's comments, denied this was the case.

"Whatever," Musk wrote. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill."


Whatever.

Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.

In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful.…

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025

Trump spoke for more than 8 minutes straight but largely focused on the budget bill itself. But as he wrapped up his monologue, the president left very little room for interpretation on where things stand with Musk.

"I'm very disappointed in Elon," Trump said. "I've helped him a lot."


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
"I'm very disappointed in Elon," Trump said. "I've helped him a lot."

Thats the fricking kiss of death. Ask Ron DeSantis. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

the half billion musk spent to get trump elected just went poof ...

it's only a matter of time before trump requires loyalty pledges to him from every member of the armed forces ...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year
Thats the fricking kiss of death.

i-know-it-was-you-fredo-godfather.gif?resize=500%2C255&ssl=1

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2    last year

That bromance ended in tragedy...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.2  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.1    last year

a predictable outcome from the beginning. trump will patch it back up before the primaries next year ... 

$$$,$$$,$$$

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.1    last year
That bromance ended in tragedy...

What's really sad is that Donald Trump actually does believe he's some sort of Godfather.

"I know it was you, Elon. If I have a heart, you broke it. You broke it! But what am I saying, not even I believe I have a heart so as long as you come back and kiss my ass like you were doing last week, I'll forget the whole thing. Come on Elon, assume the position...".

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.4  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @1.2.2    last year

... or maybe not, now that the personal attacks have started.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2  Trout Giggles    last year
The president also suggested self-interest may be a factor for Musk in his criticism of the budget bill — as the legislation does away with subsidies for electric vehicles. Musk, in a post on X responding to the president's comments, denied this was the case.

That's rich coming from the King of Self-Interest

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @2    last year

This would be a lot funnier if these narcissistic assholes werent ruining our country. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Musk thinks Trump is an ungrateful prick and Trump thinks Musk is an ungrateful prick, they both get what they deserve. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year

not enough room on the planet for those 2 egos ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    last year
"Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore."

If you do not agree with everything Trump does, you are his enemy.

This was predictable of course.   Trump has no shades of gray.   He is a petulant child.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @4    last year

musk is now a legitimate risk to our national security ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  devangelical @4.1    last year

Have head this for years and NONE have come to be true.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.1    last year

...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5  TᵢG    last year
"I'm very disappointed in Elon," Trump said. "I've helped him a lot."

Musk is likely the force that pushed Trump over the edge in the swing states.   If not for Musk, Trump could very well be wearing an ankle bracelet right now as a private citizen felon.

Note how he admitted quid pro quo.   The PotUS should not be "helping out" private citizen donors with the powers of his office.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @5    last year

trmp keeps telling on himself but nobody does anything about it

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

The cuts are getting close. Musk just posted that Trump would have lost the election without him. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @6    last year

Well, it's true

There's an article on Alternet about the coming MAGA civil war.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    last year
coming MAGA civil war

cool, they love guns. I can't wait for those videos on youtube ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @6    last year

Do you know how Musk got that black eye?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.2    last year

He says his little boy X punched him in the face.  Some people think Stephen Miller gave it to him. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.1    last year

I think Miller did it too

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @6    last year

I think Musk is spot on about that.   So Musk is illustrating how bad it is for one person to have so much money as to influence an election (albeit legally) to produce, no doubt, the worst PotUS we have ever had.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @6.3    last year

Harris outspent Trump by hundreds of millions. How much more did she need to spend to buy a victory? 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.3.1    last year

where's your source to back that up?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.3.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.2    last year

It's general knowledge. If you don't know a fact, look it up. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.3.4  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.2    last year

... it's covered by a thin layer of cotton.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.3.3    last year

No it's not general knowledge. You present an opinion as fact you are the one who needs to back it up. Don;t throw the burden on me. I don't have a problem continuing to believe that you make things up

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.3.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.5    last year
ou present an opinion as fact you are the one who needs to back it up

It's not an opinion.  Calling Harris dumb is an opinion. Pointing out that Democrats spent hundreds of millions more than Republicans during the 2024 campaign  is a fact that was referenced all the time during the campaign. It can be objectively verified for those so inclined. I'm not going to waste my time providing facts that are known to anyone who paid attention just a few months ago.  It's like asking for proof that Trump is the President. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.7  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.3.1    last year
How much more did she need to spend to buy a victory? 

I do not know; does not really matter now.   What is your estimate?

The swing states were tight.   Musk focused on the swing states.   Trump narrowly wins.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.8  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.2    last year
where's your source to back that up?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.9  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.7    last year
The swing states were tight.

Meh.  Were they?

Wisconsin was tight.  Most of the others weren't that close.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.8    last year

I can't access it but I appreciate you providing a link

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.3.11  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.10    last year
I can't access it

.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.12  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.10    last year

Sorry.  I didn't think of that.

Here is other data from US News:

Vice President Kamala Harris raised about $1.65 billion in direct donations and contributions from political action committees by October, according to  OpenSecrets, a research group that tracks money in politics , against Trump’s $1.09 billion; in other words, she lost the race despite significantly outspending Trump. So it’s fair to say that money in politics was not the deciding factor in this presidential election.

The points being that it wasn't Elon's money that made the difference, and people only seem to care about campaign money after they've lost an election.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.3.13  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.7    last year
What is your estimate?

I have no idea. At some point money has extremely diminishing returns in an election.  To pick up another couple hundred thousand votes in the rust belt might have cost another half a billion. 

usk focused on the swing states

Didn't Democrats?  I can't believe they were stupid enough to spend hundreds of millions more than Trump only to be outspent in swing states.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.14  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.3.13    last year

Since neither of us can obtain the details of the internal workings of the campaigns, I think it is reasonable that Musk's $288 million investment and his celebrity involvement could have been the factor that put Trump over the top in the swing states.

There is no way of knowing, but Musk's claim seems credible.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.15  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.9    last year
Were they?

If Harris had won WI (0.87%), MI (1.41%), and PA (1.781%), she would be PotUS.   I think that 'tight' is a good description.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.16  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.12    last year
The points being that it wasn't Elon's money that made the difference, ...

Just adding up numbers is not definitive.   Musk created a war room, engaged in questional practices to buy votes, and lent his considerable weight to the process (not everyone has an X in their back pocket).

I would not be so dismissive of Musk's claim that he was the factor that put Trump over the edge.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.17  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.15    last year
If Harris had won WI (0.87%), MI (1.41%), and PA (1.781%), she would be PotUS.   I think that 'tight' is a good description.

Trump won each of those states by more than Biden did in 2020.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.18  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.16    last year
I would not be so dismissive of Musk's claim that he was the factor that put Trump over the edge.

I said it wasn't his money.

His endorsement was significant, but for other reasons.

 (not everyone has an X in their back pocket)

Well Biden certainly had it in 2020.  It would probably be an interesting study to see how influential that change actually was.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.19  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.17    last year

Irrelevant.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.20  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.18    last year
I said it wasn't his money.

His money was most definitely a factor .   He used his money to fund his plan.   While I agree that Musk merely throwing money at the problem (if that were all he did) would likely not be effective, that is not what he did.

I think Musk's claim that he was the factor that pushed Trump over the top has merit.

Well Biden certainly had it in 2020.

I think Musk substantially changed Twitter's (X's) bias and allowed for much more campaign propaganda.   Regardless, having a media voice like X is clearly significant nowadays.   Unfortunately, too many people think that when they read the same basic crap repeatedly that it mus be true and they consider this to be 'research'.   jrSmiley_98_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.21  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.19    last year
Irrelevant.

Nonsense.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.22  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.20    last year
I think Musk's claim that he was the factor that pushed Trump over the top has merit.

I think it all depends on what we count as part of that "factor". 

If we're talking about the home stretch of the actual campaign when Harris threw away her significant lead, I'm not sure Elon had much to do with that.

If we're counting things like taking away the Twitter bias, then yeah, I agree completely and yes obviously his money was also hugely influential.  That's just not what most people consider when they talk about supporting a candidate during a campaign.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.23  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.21    last year

Jack, it does not matter that Biden won those states.   We are talking about the 2024 election and the fact that Trump won by a small margin in three states that would have made Harris PotUS.

It flat out does not matter what happened in 2020.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.24  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.22    last year
I'm not sure Elon had much to do with that.

And there is no way to know for certain.   I get that you do not think Musk's claim is true.   I think his claim has merit.   No point debating it.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.25  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.23    last year
Jack, it does not matter that Biden won those states.

You're calling it "tight" when it was significantly looser than last time.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.3.26  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.24    last year
 I get that you do not think Musk's claim is true.

I think that, like a lot of what he has said recently, it's exaggerated.

Trump benefited far more from the actions of Democrats than he did any of his allies.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.27  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.25    last year

So what?   I am not making assessments relative to 2020, I am making assessments based on the numbers.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.28  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.3.26    last year
I think that, like a lot of what he has said recently, it's exaggerated.

Yes, I know that is your view.   You know my view.   No big surprise that we do not see things exactly the same way.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Trump Says Germany Being Liberated From Nazis Was “Not a Great Day” | The New Republic

During a press conference with Merz Thursday, Trump seemed confused when the foreign leader brought up the anniversary of the  D-Day  invasion, when U.S. troops landed on the beaches in Normandy during World War II, on June 6, 1944. The military operation marked a significant turning point in the war against the Nazis.

“That was not a pleasant day for you?” Trump  asked  Merz. The U.S. president then turned to the press, adding, “This was not a great day!”

“No, that was not a pleasant—well, but in the long run, Mr. President, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship,” Merz said, as the U.S. president laughed.

Trump quickly composed himself. “That’s true, that’s true,” he said.

MERZ: Tomorrow is the D Day anniversary, when the Americans ended a war in Europe

TRUMP: That was not a pleasant day for you? This is not a great day

MERZ: This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship   pic.twitter.com/rcEDGopjVy
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar)   June 5, 2025

Trump’s wild comment about Germany’s defeat in World War II betrays a weak understanding of world history, framing the Nazis as simply a German political party and not a genocidal regime responsible for the murder of six million Jewish people, and millions of others.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @7    last year

we are being led by an idiot

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Silent
7.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1    last year

…and a laughing stock abroad. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @7    last year

Was Merz even alive when Germany was liberated from the Nazis?

D-Day is a great day and thanks for the reminder that it's tomorrow

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

X owner and tech billionaire Elon Musk has spent the week   slowly increasing his angry posts   about President Donald Trump's 2026 budget bill, hitting out because of the additions it makes to the deficit. By Thursday, however, the opposition exploded — and now Musk is separating from top allies of Trump's.

CNN reporter Hadas Gold revealed that Musk has unfollowed on X White House Deputy Chief of Staff  Stephen Miller  and far-right  podcaster Charlie Kirk . It happened after Miller was on Kirk's show on Thursday, Gold said.

A clip of Miller's call into Kirk's streaming show captured the aide saying he was "saddened" by Musk's abandonment of Trump.

"Nothing like this has ever been done before in the history of the conservative movement. This bill is electric. It is that good. It saddens me that there have been attempts to misportray it so severely," Miller claimed.
 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9  Right Down the Center    last year

They should both be put in time out.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
10  Bob Nelson    last year

Two narcissistic egomaniacs collaborating. What could possibly go wrong?

 
 

Who is online




126 visitors