╌>

Florida Senate Candidate Says White Christian Men Dont Want Their Children Turned Into N--gER Lovers

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  10 months ago  •  38 comments

Florida Senate Candidate Says White Christian Men Dont Want Their Children Turned Into N--gER Lovers

video at link

(7) Right Wing Watch on X: "A reminder that Jake Lang, who was among those pardoned for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection, is running for the U.S. Senate in Florida." / X


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T










@RightWingWatch


·




















A reminder that Jake Lang, who was among those pardoned for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection, is running for the U.S. Senate in Florida.




Quote


















800
































Ford Fischer










@FordFischer



·



21h












Replying to @FordFischer

10) Lang threw a final Sieg Heil salute outside and declared "white Christian men are not gonna sit around while you turn our children into a bunch of n****-lovers" before leading his group away.






Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    10 months ago

Trump pardoned this trash on his first day in office last January. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2  Trout Giggles    10 months ago

helluva guy

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2    10 months ago

maga!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3  CB    10 months ago

The thing speaks for itself. What would I, we, be if we called him names?!!

The bad news: This man and those he influences are sick people. The good news: He, supporters, and fellow travelers, can be fixed (healthy). and anyone willing to wait around for it to be so are encouraged to talk to him. I won't be wasting (a) breath on him and his 'type.'

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
4  CB    10 months ago

This kind of thing is why our systems of government keep failing time and time again. People not merely talking trash about Others, but letting their talk get the better of them leading to harm done. You can only talk stupidly so long before somebody decides (out of the 'blue') to act out the hate! 

What the "F" is a "ni**er lover" anyway?! 

We are all just people. Just look at this man's picture. . . the only difference between him and a black person is skin . . . he did not choose to begin with. So his 'answer' is COLOR makes him 'better'? 

Ask anybody what skin has to do with any intellect!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5  bugsy    10 months ago

This guy is a POS and will not be elected to the Florida Senate. 

This is a huge contrast to leftists in Virginia that voted for an AG who dreamed of putting 2 bullets into the head of a political rival and wishing his kids' death,. 

And probably will vote for the guy in Maine that has a nazi symbol tattooed onto his chest, claiming he didn't know what it was. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  bugsy @5    10 months ago

Can you ever stay on topic and not do a what aboutism?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.1  bugsy  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1    10 months ago
Can you ever stay on topic and not do a what aboutism?

Can you prove my post wrong?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  bugsy @5.1.1    10 months ago

What does that have to do with going off topic?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.2    10 months ago

My first post was on topic.

The rest of my post was pointing out a direct contrast between what will happen in Florida and what leftists have done with people who are just as disgusting, if not worse, than this guy in Florida.

Now, can you prove my post wrong?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5.1.4  JBB  replied to  bugsy @5.1.3    10 months ago

None of your comments is worth a bucket of spit. Do Better!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.5  bugsy  replied to  JBB @5.1.4    10 months ago

Maybe you or one if the ones that up voted your comment can counter my post...... s/

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5.1.6  JBB  replied to  bugsy @5.1.5    10 months ago

Those votes up show complete agreement with what I said...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1    10 months ago
and not do a what aboutism?

It's all they have, even when it's a stretch that huuuuuge. But they don't give a fuck that their whataboutism's are flawed or that their party loves bigots and Nazi's and embraces white supremacy, they'll whip out some stupid moronic attempt to divert or deflect the facts and try and claim it's really the rightwing conservative Southern Democrats that ought to be blamed as they completely ignore the fact that those rightwing conservative Southern Democrats from the last half century all vote Republican now. They know it's the truth, but they'll continue to lie through their teeth as they've always done. They're bigoted lying sacks of religious conservative shit and they know it, they just believe the ends justify the means because they cling to their religious fantasy that tells them they're special and their violent God loves them and will smite their enemies.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.7    10 months ago
rightwing conservative Southern Democrats

That's a lot of oxymorons for one sentence

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.9  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.8    10 months ago
That's a lot of oxymorons for one sentence

I always find it hilarious how the rightwing conservative Christian Republicans today try so hard to focus on the "Democrat" name when they refer to the rightwing conservative Christian Democrats of last century. They completely ignore the 'rightwing conservative Christian' part of the description because that still defines who they are today even though they changed their party affiliation in an attempt to escape the negative connotations. They're not fooling anyone but themselves, but apparently that is enough for them.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1.10  CB  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.9    10 months ago

It is enough for them. They are 'living their best lives' in an alternative truth where they rule the world through (Trump's) "truthful hyperbole." 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.11  bugsy  replied to  JBB @5.1.6    10 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  bugsy @5    10 months ago

The difference is amazing....

Democrats obsess about some fringe dude  who has zero shot at winning while ignoring the fanatics they elect/and or the front runner for their nomination in Maine. A guy who had a literal Nazi tattoo on his chest for years.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2    10 months ago

I guess Trump didnt spend 5 seconds learning about the people he was pardoning, or didnt care. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.1    10 months ago

We can go through some of the scumbags Obama and Biden pardoned if you want. 

Nobody defends this guy.  But bring up Jones or the Maine Nazi and democrats will all have have their backs and justify voting for them. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.2    10 months ago

How many Jake Lang's took part in the Jan 6th festivities? 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.2.4  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.2    10 months ago
Nobody defends this guy.

Good. Anybody calling out "ni**er lovers" is an errant spirit in our country and should definitely OUGHT to be marginalized by all! :)

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.5  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.1    10 months ago
guess Trump didnt spend 5 seconds learning about the people he was pardoning, o

I can one hundred percent assure you Biden had no idea he was pardoning anyone, with the exception of his corrupt family.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.2.6  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @5.2.5    10 months ago

100% assurance from bugsy?  Wow, take that to the bank … and get laughed out the door.  You couldn’t be trusted to assure that rain is wet.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.7  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.2.6    10 months ago

I can assure you that I have proven you wrong one hundred percent. All you have to do is review our encounters.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.2.8  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @5.2.7    10 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.9  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.2.8    10 months ago

Nice job countering my post s/

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.2.10  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @5.2.9    10 months ago

That is the only reasonable response to a joke like that.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.11  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.2.10    10 months ago

No, I think "I have no idea how to debunk your post because I can't" is a more believable, and less laughable, answer. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3  CB  replied to  bugsy @5    10 months ago
This guy is a POS and will not be elected to the Florida Senate. 

That is the answer we need to the point of the article, and the remainder is superfluous. Thus, it is 'extra' and can be treated as such. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @5.3    10 months ago

And that was all that needed to be said. But some have to throw their what aboutisms around like they're swinging a dead rat

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3.2  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.3.1    10 months ago

As we tell them often enough (it does not stick however): "Two" wrongs are still wrong. No matter who is saying or doing so.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6  CB    10 months ago

Let's drill down on this dude's 'concern': A ni**er lover is the exact opposite of a ni**er hater I suppose. Therefore, this dude is passively-aggressively declaring his (and those he influences) hatred of Blacks ("ni**ers"). We can be consistent if we imply that this dude and his supporters would see no problem with a return of "Jim Crow" policies to this country.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7  CB    10 months ago

LIVE: Jake Lang Leads Demonstration Against AIPAC in Washington, D.C.

CAUTION! This is pure hate rhetoric just this week apparently in D.C. It's long and there is a COUNTERPROTESTER that is very loud with a megaphone and SIREN. It's. . . real--ly bad. . .and if you are wondering (just wondering) what that black guy is doing in the video - at least once (15 - 16 minutes in) he ENGAGES a 'questioning' fellow black person (this is UNREAL). . . so now I will continue watching it myself to get finished. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7.1  CB  replied to  CB @7    10 months ago

By the way, in the video Lang (again) throws a Hitler salute (to round out his appearance) and he states that January 6th (today) and January 17th there will be events in Washington, D.C. by his 'group.'  That: "All (white) people are invited to join him for the events.  Watch for it.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7.2  CB  replied to  CB @7    10 months ago

Found it! At 58:48 seconds thereabouts in the video at 7 Jake Lang utters the line about "AIPAC. . . go home. . . white Christian men are not gonna sit around while you turn our children into a bunch of ni**er-lovers!"

The video at 7 is the full coverage of that Event.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
8  CB    10 months ago

No comment on the video at 7. WHATEVER.

 
 

Who is online






114 visitors