Stephen Miller Admits the U.S. Invaded Venezuela on CNN
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Stephen Miller is the White House deputy chief of staff, the architect of the Trump administration's immigration agenda, and a senior official involved in the operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.
On Monday afternoon, Miller went on CNN and described an American invasion of Venezuela. He acknowledged a military assault on Caracas, lethal combat with foreign forces, the seizure of a head of state, and U.S. control over another country's economy. He said all of it on live television.
Those statements matter because the Trump administration is hastily trying to frame Maduro's removal as a criminal extradition. That framing collapses under Miller's account. A criminal arrest proceeds through courts, warrants, treaties, and custody transfers. A military invasion proceeds through force. An invasion bypasses Congress, violates the United Nations Charter's ban on aggressive war, and establishes precedent for presidential seizure of foreign leaders without legal constraint. Miller described the latter.
The administration has articulated no legal authority for what was clearly a military operation. The administration has released no public authorization from Congress approving the use of U.S. military force in Venezuela. No formal legal justification has been offered explaining how the seizure of a sitting foreign head of state complies with constitutional war powers or international law. Absent congressional authorization or a recognized self-defense rationale, unilateral military action against a sovereign government falls outside established legal frameworks. Miller's description of the operation only sharpens that gap.
The interview carried institutional significance. In the weeks before it aired, the White House publicly pressured CNN to book Miller, treating airtime as an entitlement. At the same time, The Washington Postreported that Miller is under consideration for an expanded role overseeing post-Maduro operations after President Trump declared the United States would "run" Venezuela. With the secretary of state unavailable to absorb another portfolio, Miller has emerged as a governing figure rather than a messenger.
Miller began by describing the operation as a military assault. "The United States of America launched an assault force into Venezuelan territory," he said, calling it a "daring midnight assault into Caracas." Assault forces do not conduct extraditions. Midnight raids into foreign capitals do not occur under judicial authority. Miller made no reference to courts, warrants, or cooperation with Venezuelan institutions.
He described armed combat. U.S. special forces engaged in "direct gunfire with elite Cuban guards," Miller said. "Every single kill was an enemy kill." He added that reported casualty numbers were "probably lower than the actual number that were killed." That language describes a battlefield.
Miller identified the dead as Cuban personnel. He said Maduro relied on "armed Cuban guards" because he "didn't trust his own people to keep him safe." Those guards sustained "massive numbers of casualties." Killing third-country security forces inside a sovereign nation constitutes armed conflict.
Miller asserted there were no civilian casualties. "I didn't see any reports of any civilian casualties," he said, referring to a nighttime urban assault involving heavy gunfire. The certainty of that claim aligns with Miller's description of the operation as a combat mission.
Miller then described the aftermath. "The United States of America is running Venezuela by definition," he said. He explained that U.S. military forces are positioned outside the country, that Washington sets "the terms and conditions," and that Venezuela requires U.S. permission "to do commerce" and "to run an economy." That is a description of de facto control.
He extended that control to political compliance. Individuals indicted by the United States and still inside Venezuela "could become part of a future conversation," Miller said. Officials seeking a role in the transition should "cooperate fully and completely with the United States."
When Jake Tapper summarized the situation — "You invaded the country" — Miller responded, "Damn straight we did."
Stephen Miller admitted to acts that constitute war on cable television. No institution with constitutional authority has responded. The House has issued no statement. The Senate has called no hearing. The Pentagon has offered no clarification. The Justice Department has drawn no distinction between military action and criminal process. The United Nations Security Council has scheduled no emergency session. Allied governments have issued no formal protests.
Institutional silence constitutes consent.
Tapper asked direct questions and allowed Miller to answer without interruption. That approach produced a clear record of Miller's statements.
The Trump administration has no intention of contradicting Stephen Miller. Miller said exactly what he was meant to say. He described a war because the administration has abandoned the need for legal cover.
This was a test. A senior White House official admitted to invading a sovereign nation, killing foreign nationals, and asserting control over another country's government on live television.
Miller's interview was not a gaffe. It was doctrine. And it was a test: Can a senior White House official admit to invading a sovereign nation, killing foreign nationals, and asserting control over another country's government on live television without facing institutional consequences? So far, the answer is yes.
This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.
Tags:CNNDonald TrumpJake TapperNicolas MaduroStephen MillerVenezuela Previous PostNext Post Previous PostNext Post Colby Hall - Founding Editor
Colby Hall is the Founding Editor of Mediaite.com. He is also a Peabody Award-winning television producer of non-fiction narrative programming as well as a terrific dancer and preparer of grilled meats.
More Stories by Colby Hall Load Comments
Tags
Who is online
114 visitors
Miller is dying to say Trump can do whatever he wants to whoever he wants. The arrogance is sick and probably scares a lot of Americans.
This is all far more serious then some realize.
What could this possibly matter?
Well, you seem to be fine with the US invading Venezuela so it may not matter to you.
Is this breaking news? You seeded a story two days ago about it. Trump held a press conference about it. Miller isn't revealing any secrets here.
Who in the administration called this an invasion before this afternoon?
Are you quibbling that's it not an invasion without sustained boots on the ground? Should Miller be reprimanded for stretching the definition of invasion?
You dont get it. Miller is proud to call it an invasion. He was excited
Miller doesnt say things that Trump doesnt approve of. Trump has never reprimanded Miller, and he wont this time either.
They want Trump to be free to attack other countries .
If they had just captured Maduro and said it was something they had to do and let that be the end of it maybe it would be a different story now. But no, Trump is saying we might go after Colombia, because we can. He is threatening Greenland .
The US was denounced in the UN Security council today . Is this what we want for our country? When is enough going to be enough and people like you realize Trump is a sick bastard?
Bingo
We are now the country Russia, China, and N. Korea can vote to impose sanctions on, and sorta makes it tougher to rail against Putins' invasion, when we are currently doing the same as Russia in the Ukraine. Tough to lecture China when it invades Taiwan no ? Aren't we special ?
These people on the 'right', the down players of any and all Trump has done, to lower this once great nation, cause it be a LOT lowered, sort of have to reexamine WTF they are defending this LYING POS FOR, and possibly start to concede their Mistake. Unless they really wanted a WAR, cause Trump is like a box of chocolates, cause U never know what he's gonna do, but we pretty much knew or should have known, IS
that every damn piece of chocolate, in that box of chocolates, had and was, NUTZ
I still have no why you think Calling it an invasion matters, at all. We invaded Panama and arrested Noriega. We invaded Venezuela and arrested Maduro. Call it what you will.
They want Trump to be free to attack other countries
Stephen Millers’s verb choices has no effect on trumps powers as commander in chief.
The US was denounced in the UN Security council today . Is this what we want for our country
Defintiely not the first and it won’t be the last. Am I supposed care what a bunch of corrupt raging anti semites care? What did those countries do to stop maduro? Many of them enabled them.
We now know why Trump is fine with Russia trying to conquer Ukraine. He wants the same sort of freedom of action (although probably without the hundreds of thousands of deaths) in the Western Hemisphere. .