╌>

Here's what J. Michael Luttig says needs to happen to end a 'war for democracy'

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  2 years ago  •  2 comments

By:   Adrian Florido, Robert Baldwin III, Natalie Winston (NPR. org)

Here's what J. Michael Luttig says needs to happen to end a 'war for democracy'
If the two political parties are going to be fighting literally over America's democracy, that is a war that is endless, and it is destructive of the United States of America.

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners


Another attempt to politically gaslight the American public.  Luttig highlights the history of Civil War and, yet, completely ignores the lessons of that history.  One can only assume Luttig has engaged in deliberate ignorance.  Notice the prominence of political parties in Luttig's false narrative?

Prior to the Civil War the established two party political system had become so dysfunctional, so self serving, and so corrupt that the American public rejected established politics and formed their own grass roots movement.  That grass roots movement became the Republican Party.  There really wasn't a Republican Party before the Civil War.  The Republican Party emerged from the Civil War as a full fledged political party that dominated politics for several decades after the war.  The established Whig Party disappeared and the established Democratic Party was denied the means to regain power.  The American people put a stop to the dysfunction and self serving corruption of the political establishment.

J. Michael Luttig is completely wrong in his assessment.  The threat to American democracy actually comes from the two party political establishment that serves itself rather than serving the country.  The current two party political system has become so corrupt that it is rigging elections to protect the two party status quo and has subsumed government as an extension of party politics.  Luttig is correct that the current political environment resembles that prior to the Civil War.  But Luttig's argument that the two party system can fix itself is disingenuous.  Luttig's conclusion dives into intentional obtuseness by ignoring that protecting the two party political establishment depends upon weakening American democracy.

The American people will save democracy by destroying the established political parties.  We are witnessing a competition between grass roots movements to overthrow the status quo political ideology of the two party establishment.  Both the Republican Party and Democratic Party are being attacked from within. What is happening really threatens the two dominant political parties.  History is repeating itself.  As the current two party establishment adopts more extreme undemocratic measures to protect itself, the country will move toward a political upheaval comparable to the Civil War.  The lesson of history is that American democracy will not be denied and will win in the end.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



During Thursday's Jan. 6 committee hearing, retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig issued a dire warning to the country. Luttig, who advised former Vice President Mike Pence, said that 17 months after the riot on the U.S. Capitol, "Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present danger to American democracy."

Luttig said the United States is at a crossroads similar to the one the country faced during the Civil War, and he said America needs help.

Luttig was appointed to the federal bench by George H.W. Bush and worked in both the Bush and Reagan administrations. He said in his written testimony that the U.S. is in a "war" over the nation's democracy and that "only the party that instigated this war can end it," calling on the Republican Party to start a reconciliation process.

Speaking to NPR on Saturday, Luttig reiterated his message that lawmakers must begin talking to each other as "fellow Americans that have a shared destiny and shared hopes and dreams for America." But Republicans must start the process, he added.

Luttig spoke with NPR's All Things Considered about the odds of members of the Republican Party starting these good-faith conversations, pro-Trump candidates currently running for office, and whether the Jan. 6 committee hearings can help close the divide.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Interview Highlights


Do you think that there is a meaningful constituency within your party, the Republican Party that is, willing to have good-faith conversations about this? And if so where are they?

As of the day that I testified, no, there are none, and there haven't been for these couple of years. I'm not a politician, I don't do politics, but that's what I propose happen. And it's with my fervent hope that some number of our elected leaders, at least, will hear the words that I spoke on Thursday and understand what I said, which is that they have an obligation, a high obligation, that they undertake by oath to act in the interest of America and Americans in contrast to their own personal political interests.

If you look at the most recent primaries, pro-Trump candidates are still competing across the country and winning on the lie that there was election fraud in 2020. How do you build trust in our democracy, in the idea that we can get to a better place in our country when you have people at these important high levels who are denying the 2020 election results?

You don't and you can't, and that's why I testified Thursday that the former president and his party are today a clear and present danger for American democracy. And I specifically contrasted that with the circumstance, had it been so, that the former president and the Republican Party had stood down after the 2020 election and accepted the results. But as I said to the select committee on Thursday, that's not what's happened.

To this day, the former president and the Republican Party have insisted — and they persist in the claim — that the 2020 election was stolen, and not merely that, but they pledge to execute the same blueprint in 2024 that they attempted in 2020. But their every intention is if they do execute on that plan in 2024 that they will win in 2024 where they failed in 2020.

The January 6th hearings are clearly important for the country to understand what happened on that day and why it happened, and I know you feel that way, but many Republicans do not. They call the hearings an effort to divide. And so I wonder whether you think that they're more likely to bring closure or further fuel this division that you say is destroying our democracy?

Well, when I turned in my statement to discussing the two political parties in the United States, the most important words to me ... were that the two political parties in America are the political guardians of our democracy. That's why I went on to say that it's imperative that both parties end this one war for democracy and suggesting that it was the obligation of the Republican Party to begin that reconciliation.

We cannot have in America either political party behaving itself like the Republican Party has since the 2020 election. As long as that continues then we will have an unstable democratic order in the United States, and we will forever be fighting over American democracy. As I went on to say in my statement, the war for America's democracy is not a war that America can win.

If the two political parties are going to be fighting literally over America's democracy, that is a war that is endless, and it is destructive of the United States of America. And there is not a person in this country who can disagree with that. They can argue over you know whether, as the Republicans have continued to do, the 2020 activities of the former president in the party threatened democracy. They're silly to even suggest that. But they cannot argue over the abstract point, the conceptual point that I made, which is if the two parties cannot agree to the orderly transfer of power in the United States then that war will continue, and as long as it continues we do not have democracy in the United States.

Do you think that the January 6th hearings that are going on right now might actually sort of break through and encourage politicians to maybe start to stand up on this issue?

Well, you know I'm a former judge and a lawyer, and to my knowledge, I've never spoken publicly a single word of politics. So count me as cynical as to politics and all politicians. Do I think that maybe these hearings can break through to some American patriots who are currently our political leaders? I hope with all my heart and soul that the hearings will break through to those political leaders.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    2 years ago

American democracy will revitalize itself by destroying the dysfunctional, self serving, corrupt two party political establishment.  The two party political establishment is being torn apart from within.  History is repeating itself.  Ignoring that history and politically gaslighting the public won't forestall the American people's desire to save democracy from the threat posed by the two party political establishment.

 
 

Who is online


Jeremy Retired in NC
Greg Jones
SteevieGee
Sparty On


63 visitors