New executive order will expand race preferences throughout the federal government
By: Alison Somin, Opinion Contributor (The Hill)
How can anyone deny Biden has embraced socialism? How can anyone deny that Biden is attempting to transform government into a socialist institution?
The idea of a proletariat collective, espoused by Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels, was built upon a foundation of equity. Equity was the motivation for the Bolshevik revolution. Equity was a tenet of Mao Tse Tung's Cultural Revolution. Socialism demands equity in all aspects of society and utilizes autocratic centralized power over society to achieve equity. Socialist equity is a Big Government solution.
Yet, these quasi-socialist elites demanding a centrally planned equity ignore and disparage the equity embedded in our own Bill of Rights. Our Constitution uses equality to limit the autocratic power of government and places onus for achieving equity directly into the hands of the people being governed. An autocratic government serving special interests is not a equitable government and cannot become an equitable government.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Individuals should be treated as individuals and not on the basis of their membership in racial groups, especially by our government. Unfortunately, a new executive order encourages federal agencies to focus on racial group identity rather than the character and qualifications of employees and contractors. It will result in racial quotas in hiring, procuring, and even using artificial intelligence throughout the government.
The executive order's stated goal is advancing racial equity throughout the federal government. The word "equity" appears 21 times. The order brims with talk about "new action plans to advance equity," "extending and strengthening equity-advancing requirements for agencies," and requires agencies to convene "Equity Teams" charged with ensuring that their agencies are "delivering equitable outcomes."
While equity sounds similar to "equality," the two concepts are quite different. A Biden campaign video narrated by Vice President Kamala Harris nicely sums up the difference, indicating that the administration uses "equality" to mean that each individual is given the same opportunities. "Equity," on the other hand, seeks to achieve equal outcomes.
Equity's demand for equal outcomes means that groups must be represented proportionately to their share of the population. However, no occupation has demographics that perfectly mirror the demographics of the general population. Cambodians are over-represented in the doughnut industry because of a single brave entrepreneur's successes. Manicurists are disproportionately Vietnamese American due to actress Tippi Hedren's volunteer work in a refugee camp in the 1970s. As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor famously quipped, "It is completely unrealistic to assume that unlawful discrimination is the sole cause of people failing to gravitate to jobs and employers in accord with the laws of chance."
How can proportional representation be achieved in federal employment or contracting? Agencies often will be forced to discriminate against prospective employees or contractors from overrepresented groups to ensure that the numbers come out the right way. Instead of remedying unfair discrimination based on race, color or national origin, a demand for "equity" will actually encourage discrimination.
Marty Hierholzer's story here is illustrative. Hierholzer is a disabled veteran and former naval deep sea diver who sought assistance through the Small Business Administration's disadvantaged business program. However, Hierholzer was rejected from participating in the program because of his race.
The executive order also requires agencies to use "artificial intelligence and automated systems … in a manner that advances equity." Computers cannot have the same kind of racial biases that humans do. Although the federal government can take appropriate measures to ensure that artificial intelligence is not used for intentional discrimination, it would be wrong to require that artificial intelligence be used in a manner that yields proportional demographic results. As with employment and contracting, this obsession with proportionality will lead to discrimination in violation of civil rights laws.
While the executive order avoids requiring racial quotas directly, using indirect methods to engineer particular racial outcomes is also illegal. Racist government officials in the Jim Crow South infamously used grandfather clauses and literacy tests as facially race-neutral methods of achieving racial goals. The courts did not accept these subterfuges, and nor should courts now. Rather than combating racial discrimination, this executive order will require it.
Congress should use its investigative powers to expose discrimination brought about by these equity action plans. Individuals and businesses that face discrimination should challenge unlawful acts motivated by this executive order.
Alison Somin (@AlisonSomin) is an attorney and legal fellow at Pacific Legal Foundation, a nonprofit legal organization that defends Americans' liberties when threatened by government overreach and abuse.
Tags
Who is online
571 visitors
Equality is a limitation placed upon government. Those demanding Big Government solutions are ignoring the limitations of equality to create an autocratic equity based upon government favoritism. A government serving special interests is not an equitable government and cannot become an equitable government.
Socialist equity will only foster corruption in government and create an unequal and unequitable society.
Biden dragging us back in time to the roots of the Democratic Party, where race defines people's rights. .
Not just race but gender identity as well.
Check the box stupidity is in full force in the Brandon administration. Who cares if they can do the job; they match the race/gender identity criteria that Democrats crave.
They are building off the Jim Crow foundation
Nothing like dragging civil rights back 146 years.
There is no denying that Democrats utilized southern racial politics to favor a white population. But everyone ignores that Democrats' favoritism for a 'white privilege' did not benefit the white working class. Southern racial politics was about protecting a privileged elite from working class concerns.
Democrats' identity politics is really about using race to protect class distinctions. The working class is supposed to blame a race for their unfair treatment by government. It's like rubbing the noses of two dogs together to start a fight. Whoever starts the fight gets all the benefit without any of the risk.
It's sad that this administration feels the need to push everything via EO. Very dictator like of Biden.
Let's be honest. Biden is following Trump in that Trump used EO's to remove everything that Obama set up by EO, and Biden is working to negate everything that Trump did via EO. And Trump did average 55 EO's per year of office where as Biden has only averaged 51 per year, although it can be said that Biden still has another 22 months in office.
There is a distinct difference between Obama, Biden and Trump. Trump was the only one of them that had a congress that was against him the whole time. Obama and Biden didn't. Biden's stack of EOs on his 1st day was purely retaliatory. For his first 2 years he could have gotten so much done via legislation but didn't.