╌>

US flying surveillance drones farther south over Black Sea after collision with Russian fighter jet, officials say

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  last year  •  15 comments

By:   Oren Liebermann, Jim Sciutto (CNN)

US flying surveillance drones farther south over Black Sea after collision with Russian fighter jet, officials say
I’m not going to, for operational security reasons, not going to get into the specifics of routes, missions, timelines, things like that

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

The US military responds to a US drone being downed over the Black Sea by Russian aircraft.  Maybe the Russian pilots were incompetent but their mission was successful.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



(CNN) - The US is flying surveillance drones farther south above the Black Sea after a Russian jet collided with a US drone last week, according to two US officials.

The drone flights have remained in international airspace, but since the collision between one of the Russian jets and the MQ-9 Reaper drone last Tuesday, the US has moved its drone flights farther away from airspace surrounding the Crimean peninsula and eastern portions of the Black Sea.

One of the officials said the routes are part of an effort “to avoid being too provocative,” as the Biden administration remains careful to avoid an incident that could potentially escalate into a direct conflict between US and Russian forces.

The official said the drone flights would continue this way “for the time being,” but added there is already “an appetite” to return to the routes closer to Russian-held territory. The officials also said Russia may try to unilaterally declare a broader closure of airspace around southern and eastern Ukraine in an attempt to force US drone flights farther out.

On Tuesday, FlightRadar24, a commercial flight tracking website, showed a US RQ-4 Global Hawk remaining in the southern and southwestern portions of the Black Sea at an altitude of approximately 52,000 feet.

Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said Tuesday the US was continuing to operate drones over the Black Sea, “flying in international airspace in accordance with international law.” But he declined to say whether the US had changed its routes or mission profiles following last week’s encounter between a US spy drone and two Russian fighter jets.

“I’m not going to, for operational security reasons, not going to get into the specifics of routes, missions, timelines, things like that,” Ryder said at a press briefing.

Last week, two Russian Sukhoi SU-27 fighter jets harassed a US MQ-9 Reaper drone operating in international airspace over the Black Sea. One of the jets then collided with the surveillance drone, damaging its propeller and forcing it down.

Following the incident, CNN reported that the US was conducting an assessment of drone flights over the Black Sea to include potential routes, altitudes, risks and more. The purpose of the assessment was to evaluate the intelligence gathered from the missions against the risk of escalation with Russia.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said after the incident the US would “continue to fly and to operate wherever international law allows.” Even as the US carried out the assessment, another MQ-9 Reaper drone flew over the Black Sea in approximately the same area as the downed flight to survey the crash site, officials said.

Several days later, a US RQ-4 Global Hawk flew above southern portions of the Black Sea, venturing into the eastern regions of the waterway near Russian territory, according to FlightRadar24.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    last year

Russia could fly drones out of Cuba.  But as long as those drones remain in international airspace, the United States wouldn't do anything?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Nerm_L @1    last year

Cuba currently bans drone use.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    last year
Cuba currently bans drone use.

The Cuban government has supported Russia's invasion of Ukraine from the beginning.  The Cuban government has stated that the United States is responsible for the war in Ukraine.  Cuba has chosen a side and it's not our side.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.1    last year

Yes, both unrelated facts are correct.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.3  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.2    last year
Yes, both unrelated facts are correct.

Unrelated?  That's interesting, please, tell me more.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.2  arkpdx  replied to  Nerm_L @1    last year

Russia does not have drones comparable to those of the US 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2  Sparty On    last year

Yes because uncle Joe wouldn’t want to be provocative towards his buddies Xi and Vlady.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Sparty On @2    last year

Brandon would cut Xi any amount of slack. Vlad; not so much. He would have to deal with the TDS suffering mighty mental midgets in his own party that are still butt sore over the 2016 elections; and he needs them in his camp for 2024. He loses their support; and he might find himself under the same bus as Hunter, his brother, and anyone else in his family that has taken money from overseas for Brandon doing political favors.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.2  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Sparty On @2    last year
Yes because uncle Joe wouldn’t want to be provocative towards his buddies Xi and Vlady.

Improving relations between Russia and China may provide a pathway for a stronger Chinese presence in Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.  Aren't those countries driving the illegal immigration crisis in the United States?

China knows how to use economics and trade to wage a 'cold war'.  Isolating China with sanctions won't work and Biden knows it.  A partnership between Russia and China could open Latin America for China's belt and road policies.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
Last week, two Russian Sukhoi SU-27 fighter jets harassed a US MQ-9 Reaper drone operating in international airspace over the Black Sea. One of the jets then collided with the surveillance drone, damaging its propeller and forcing it down

An MQ-9 is not a "surveillance drone".  It is called the "Reaper" because of it's payload:

Armament: Combination of AGM-114 Hellfire missiles, GBU-12 Paveway II, GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions, GBU-49 Enhanced Paveway II, and GBU-54 Laser Joint Direct Attack Munitions

With that platform in the air, there was more than surveillance going on.  

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    last year
An MQ-9 is not a "surveillance drone".  It is called the "Reaper" because of it's payload:

That's not entirely correct.  The US military configures a single platform for multiple roles to simplify procurement, logistics, training, and support.  A Reaper is an armed Predator.  But Predators are also configured specifically for surveillance.  We don't know if the downed Predator was armed.  And the military won't tell us for 'national security reasons'.

The interesting bit of info from the seed is that the US has been flying Global Hawks over the Black Sea.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1    last year

There is are distinct differences between the MQ-9 (Reaper) and the MQ-1 (Predator).  Neither the Reaper or Predator are used for surveillance.  (A unit I was assigned to in Afghanistan tried and we got our asses handed to us by the Chain of Command)  That is the mission of the RQ-7 (Shadow).  It is more cost efficient and maneuverable than both the MQ-1 and 9.

Our resident wokesters will go full woke on this article as well.

I was kind of surprised to hear of them flying but remember we are still fighting in Iraq and Syria and have some based in Europe.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.2  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.1    last year
There is are distinct differences between the MQ-9 (Reaper) and the MQ-1 (Predator).  Neither the Reaper or Predator are used for surveillance.  (A unit I was assigned to in Afghanistan tried and we got our asses handed to us by the Chain of Command)  That is the mission of the RQ-7 (Shadow).  It is more

That's not what the Air Forces says.   

I admit I always confuse the Predator and Reaper and often think they are the same aircraft.  Thanks for reminding me they're not. 

I don't know if the US is still flying drones out of Turkey.  There was a kerfuffle over US aircraft based in Turkey and don't recall if that has been resolved.  Drones based in Iraq would still need to overfly Turkey to get to the Black Sea.  The US could fly drones out of one of the Balkan NATO member states, too.  It's difficult to find info because it's been classified for national security reasons.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    last year
An MQ-9 is not a "surveillance drone

It has many uses including those of surveillance. CPB has used them on both borders ... I seriously doubt they were armed.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    last year

I know for a fact that the US Customs & Border Patrol use MQ-9 Reaper drones outfitted for surveillance use on our borders. I have seen them land at my local airport here in Arizona in CBP markings.

 
 

Who is online


GregTx
Igknorantzruls
JohnRussell
Gazoo
JBB
Hal A. Lujah


428 visitors