╌>

Trump businesses took in nearly $8 million from foreign governments: House Democrats

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  11 months ago  •  18 comments

By:   Rebecca Beitsch (The Hill)

Trump businesses took in nearly $8 million from foreign governments: House Democrats
Former President Trump took in at least $7.8 million from foreign entities in 20 countries, according to a new report from Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, payments to his various businesses that critics say could violate a constitutional prohibition on accepting funding from foreign governments. The volume of foreign payments during Trump's presidency is…

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

Now Democrats are claiming Trump is like Biden?  Certainly looks like Biden is going to be using a Trump defense.  

Look, Squirrel ...


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Former President Trump took in at least $7.8 million from foreign entities in 20 countries, according to a new report from Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, payments to his various businesses that critics say could violate a constitutional prohibition on accepting funding from foreign governments.

The volume of foreign payments during Trump's presidency is detailed in one of the most exhaustive reviews of Trump's business dealings with foreign governments while in office.

Democrats cautioned the total figure is likely larger, and they blasted GOP leadership they've accused of releasing Trump's accounting firm Mazars from turning over requested documents just four months after a years-long legal battle forced it to comply with a congressional subpoena.

"Critically, even this subset of documents reveals a stunning web of millions of dollars in payments made by foreign governments and their agents directly to Trump-owned businesses, while President Trump was in the White House," Democrats wrote in their report.

"By pocketing foreign states' payments, President Trump repeatedly placed his personal financial interest and the interests of foreign wealth and power above the public interest, resulting in precisely the split loyalty between foreign power and the American people that the Framers sought to avoid."

The lion's share of the foreign money — some $5.6 million — flowed from China, which, along with other countries, primarily patronized three properties: Trump hotels in Washington and Las Vegas and Trump Tower in New York.

Concerned the billionaire hotelier's businesses would be a magnet for foreign spending, ethics experts have long sounded the alarm that Trump's properties would be a route for violating the emoluments clause of the constitution, which prohibits the president and other government officials from receiving profit or gain because of their role.

The report comes as the GOP is seeking to highlight the extent relatives of President Biden, mainly his son Hunter Biden, conducted business with foreign governments, including China.

While Hunter Biden did conduct millions of dollars of business with Chinese companies and investors, the review of Trump's business ledgers showed income from Chinese government sources like China's Embassy in the U.S. and the Chinese state-affiliated Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC).

ICBC spent $5.4 million over nearly three years for a lease at Trump Tower.

The report also covers Trump's business with other Chinese companies that would not trigger emoluments clause violations but that have otherwise been under scrutiny.

The records show that CEFC, a private Chinese energy company that also did business with Hunter Biden, spent more than $5 million on an apartment in Trump World Tower through its subsidiary.

Oversight Republicans dismissed the report as part of an "obsession" with Trump.

"Former President Trump has legitimate businesses but the Bidens do not. The Bidens and their associates made over $24 million by cashing in on the Biden name in China, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Romania. No goods or services were provided other than access to Joe Biden and the Biden network," Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement.

However, a Washington Post fact-check found that within that pool of foreign business dealings, just $7.5 million went to Biden family members, with roughly $7 million going directly to Hunter Biden.

The fact check also said many of those businesses were not shell companies, as Comer claimed, but were organized around legitimate business activities or investments.

Other countries that patronized Trump's businesses include Saudi Arabia, with more than $615,000 spent at his properties, and Qatar, which spent more than $460,000.

When Trump was running for office in 2015, he boasted of his good relationship with the Saudis based on his business dealings.

"Saudi Arabia, I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million," he said at a campaign rally.

"Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much!"

The payments from the Saudi government and its royal family came as the country was working to secure a $100 billion arms deal with the U.S., spending money at Trump properties the month he signed the May 2019 deal.

While the report offers significant insights into Trump's business activities, it notes shortcomings in documenting the larger picture, writing that what was uncovered was likely a fraction of total spending.

Mazars was either never provided or did not retain key records, the report says, while accusing Comer of releasing the company from providing the records won in a court battle.

House Oversight Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) in March pointed to a letter from Trump attorney Patrick Strawbridge saying, "I do not know the status of Mazars production, but my understanding is that the committee has no interest in forcing Mazars to complete it and is willing to release it from further obligations under the settlement agreement."

Comer denied that at the time.

"There has been no coordination or discussion with anyone from the committee's majority with anyone about the Mazars documents," Comer spokesman Jessica Collins said in a statement to The Washington Post, calling the allegations "completely unfounded and untrue."

The report follows another review earlier this year documenting Trump's failure to disclose more than $250,000 in gifts from foreign governments.

The Hill has reached out to the Trump campaign for comment.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    11 months ago

So, Biden is going to use a Trump defense?  Now Trump is Biden but, somehow, Biden ain't Trump?

320

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @1    11 months ago

What a silly comment. Trump's fraud, cheating , and unethical business practices far pre-date what the kangaroo court Republican committees are "investigating" about Biden. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    11 months ago

So they can't even investigate the Biden Family selling Traitor Joe now?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    11 months ago

Nonsense.    

Biden has never had a real “private sector” job.   He’s been sucking off the taxpayer teet for 50 years.    At least Trump has offered a service/product, created jobs, met payrolls, paid probably billions in payroll and other taxes.

Biden is a joke in comparison.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.3  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    11 months ago
What a silly comment. Trump's fraud, cheating , and unethical business practices far pre-date what the kangaroo court Republican committees are "investigating" about Biden. 

320

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.4  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    11 months ago

 "Trump's fraud, cheating , and unethical business practices far pre-date what the kangaroo court Republican committees are "investigating" about Biden."

 Do you have any evidence of such? What a silly comment.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Guide
1.1.5  goose is back  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.4    11 months ago
 Do you have any evidence of such? What a silly comment.

I am not sure if he has figured out the whole Russian thing was a lie, Hunter's laptop is real and somehow the Biden Family earned over 20 million for doing what appears to be nothing. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2  Sparty On    11 months ago

Gawd, the loonie lefts straw grasping just gets worse with time.

Sad.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3  1stwarrior    11 months ago

I donno 'bout where some of these idiots come up with these ideas.

Trump, prior to being sworn in as President, divested and distanced himself from his businesses, turning it over to the Corporate management of Trump Enterprises.

The Dems/Libs screamed and hollered that he couldn't do that, but DOJ said it was legal.

So if it was legal according to DOJ, why are the Dems/Libs crying - again - other than the fact that it has "Trump's" name on the corporation???

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  Texan1211  replied to  1stwarrior @3    11 months ago

This tells me Democrats are getting more worried about the Biden Family business being made public.

Time to deflect to the only thing they can.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4  Ronin2    11 months ago

Wow, it took Democrats how long to uncover this?

Do they have any proof that Trump or his businesses didn't pay taxes on the money received? Do they have any proof that the businesses provided no goods or services- like the rooms rented by the ICBC sitting empty for 4 years? That they were overcharged? That Trump or any of his family members had any contact with any of the parties- and favors were forwarded to Trump to be granted. What services or goods did Hunter Biden offer the companies that hired and funneled millions through LLC's to both him and his family members?

The payments from the Saudi government and its royal family came as the country was working to secure a $100 billion arms deal with the U.S., spending money at Trump properties the month he signed the May 2019 deal.

Remind us all did Democrats vote against this spending? How about Republicans?  Didn't Hunter receive millions from Ukraine? Didn't Brandon do the company that Hunter worked for in Ukraine a favor by getting the prosecutor fired that was investigating it? How many billions has Brandon funneled to Ukraine; while begging for billions more. Unlike the Saudis (Who were spending $100 billion on US arms of their own money. The nerve of Trump bringing in foreign capital to be spent on US goods.) the Ukrainian government is never going to repay the largesse Brandon is heaping upon them to the US taxpayer.

Just another "But Trruuuummmmppppp!!!!!!" deflection by the Democrats and their media shills. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
5  Right Down the Center    11 months ago

Former President Trump took in at least $7.8 million from foreign entities in 20 countries, according to a new report from Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, payments to his various businesses that critics say could violate a constitutional prohibition on accepting funding from foreign governments.

Impeach the Bastard!

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6  JBB    11 months ago

Yeah, but Biden's second cousin's Honda lawnmower shop in Duluth sold millions MILLIONS in foreign, um, lawnmowers! So, it is all the same thing?

The wives of Supreme Court Justices sit on corporate boards. The sons and daughters of Senators and Congress persons get prime jobs and exceptional opportunities. That is the way it is. Get back to us if the gop wants to outlaw Americans profiting from their personal connections!

The friends and family of rich powerful people are free to make a living and it is perfectly legal if they profit from their access to money and power. As long as we are not talking about criminal acts, it is legal and always was...

What are you gonna do? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @6    11 months ago
Yeah, but Biden's second cousin's Honda lawnmower shop in Duluth sold millions MILLIONS in foreign, um, lawnmowers! So, it is all the same thing?

That is ignorant.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    11 months ago

Meanwhile back at the Trump fraud factory -

www.independent.co.uk   /news/world/americas/crime/donald-trump-video-phone-acn-trial-b2471983.html

Trump to face new civil trial for duping investors with failed video phone

Namita Singh 2-3 minutes   1/2/2024


Donald Trump   is set to face another   civil trial   for allegedly duping investors into putting money into a failed video phone.

The   trial   relates to the activities of ACN Inc, a multilevel marketing firm, and is scheduled to start on 29 January, though the case might be pushed to a later date, reported   Newsweek .

Four anonymous plaintiffs in the proposed class action   accused Mr Trump, his children Donald Jr,   Eric   and   Ivanka , and an affiliate of the   Trump Organization   of promoting   ACN   in exchange for millions of dollars in secret payments from 2005 to 2015.

The plaintiffs said Mr Trump’s endorsement, including on episodes of his TV show The Celebrity Apprentice, conned them into thinking their investments would pay off.

ACN would charge $499 to clients to sell videophones and other goods, the plaintiffs alleged, in the lawsuit moved before   Manhattan   court in 2018. They said the real goal was for   the Trumps   to enrich themselves, including through the receipt of millions of dollars in secret payments from 2005 to 2015.

" Trump   also told investors that he had ‘experienced the opportunity’ and ‘done a lot of research,’ and that his endorsement was ‘not for any money.’ Not a word of this was true," the lawsuit reportedly states.

Earlier, the Trumps claimed they had no control over ACN, that Trump’s endorsement was simply his opinion and that the civil lawsuit – one of many they face – was politically motivated.

In May last year the plaintiffs, described as former Trump fans, voluntarily dropped the suit against the three Trump children – Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr – to streamline the dispute, reported Bloomberg.

However depositions by the Trump children “made clear” that the former president “was the architect, principal actor, and largest beneficiary of the fraudulent scheme”, the plaintiffs’ lawyer Roberta Kaplan said in a statement at the time. The deposition statements by the three can still be used at trial, even as   Mr Trump and his company remain defendants.
 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
7.1.1  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1    11 months ago

secret payments from 2005 to 2015

Just can't believe this.  Trump wasn't even a CANDIDATE them.

Can't you folks find anything out 'bout when he was - what - five or six years old?  I mean the "reaching" to find something wrong makes octopi get dizzy.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
8  Sparty On    11 months ago

Meanwhile Biden is facing investigations into a complete failure of a political career.    Going back 50 years or to paraphrase his old boss.    

Never underestimate Joe’s ability to F things up.

 
 

Who is online



JohnRussell
jw
Dismayed Patriot
Snuffy


292 visitors