╌>

Biden hasn't just opened the Border. He's secretly flying migrants in en masse

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  9 months ago  •  23 comments

By:   Dave Seminara (The Telegraph)

Biden hasn't just opened the Border. He's secretly flying migrants in en masse
Some 320,000 migrants were flown into 43 airports around the United States and were given parole

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

Yes, there is a secret conspiracy to take over the country.  But it's not by white supremacists.  And the conspirators have already taken over the White House.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Joe Biden boasted in his inaugural address that his election was a win for the "cause of democracy". "This is democracy's day" he said. But when it comes to immigration, Mr. Biden has flagrantly abused executive power, governing contrary to the will of the people, and has sought to hide the details of his lawless, open-borders agenda from the public. The latest evidence of his administration's secretive migration schemes reveals that they allowed 320,000 otherwise inadmissible migrants to fly into the country last year but won't reveal where they landed.


512





The revelation comes thanks to an extraordinary lawsuit filed by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) meant to uncover the details of Mr. Biden's abuse of humanitarian parole for otherwise inadmissible migrants. Some 320,000 migrants were flown into 43 airports around the United States and were given parole, which grants them authorization to live and work in the country for at least two years. These are all migrants who have no lawful claim to live in the United States based upon the laws passed by our elected representatives. Humanitarian parole was created via the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, which permits the president to admit people "only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit."

Every President but Trump has used it: but none quite like Mr. Biden, who has paroled at least a million migrants. Before Biden, some migrants were granted parole, for example, to obtain lifesaving medical treatment, or, in other cases, citizens of an entire country were temporarily eligible for it due to conflicts or famines. This administration created an app, CBP One (which should stand for Crazy Biden Parole) in order to allow migrants who would otherwise cross the border illegally to schedule authorized arrivals. The point was to ease the embarrassing numbers of migrants crossing the border illegally. But from the start, the administration has sought to conceal everything it can about the program.

Thanks to the CIS lawsuit, we learned that the parole program started 19 months earlier than the administration publicly admitted, and involved far more countries - 93 rather than the several they advertised - and migrants than they've previously acknowledged. Now they're concealing which airports the migrants landed in on the dubious grounds that doing so could "reveal operational vulnerabilities that could be exploited by bad actors".

I asked Mark Krikorian, the executive director of CIS, about the administration's excuses and he said that neither possible interpretation is good. "Either they're exaggerating the security threat at U.S. airports posed by its unlawful parole programs to avoid revealing politically embarrassing information, or it's telling the truth - meaning it has knowingly compromised the safety of the American people in order to wave in hundreds of thousands of foreigners who have no right to enter the country", he said.

For months, progressive mayors have blamed Texas governor Greg Abbott for busing migrants north to their cities. But recent estimates of that busing program run only up to about 90,000, so mayors like New York's Erik Adams ought to be blaming Joe Biden for the mess they're now dealing with. President Biden gave a speech at the border this week blaming Republicans for failing to pass a much too soft immigration bill. He didn't mention his dubious parole program and the mainstream media here has ignored the CIS revelations. But the truth is spilling out and if Donald Trump wins in November, it won't because of Hunter's laptop or inflation. It'll be because Joe Biden opened the border and still won't own up to it.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    9 months ago

Why would Venezuelans being fast tracked into the country care about Sweden joining NATO?  Apparently Biden thinks immigrants are too stupid to notice they're being thrown under the bus before they even arrive.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1  Dig  replied to  Nerm_L @1    9 months ago

Click and read – Snopes

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Dig @1.1    9 months ago
Click and read – Snopes

Didn't you read your own link?

  • A Biden administration program was responsible for flying 320,000 migrants directly into the United States between January and December 2023. (True)

What part of (True) is difficult to understand?  Snopes successfully refuted red herrings by sniping facts.  How very Pelosi. 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Dig  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.1    9 months ago

Are you fucking kidding me? Is your intent nothing more than bad-faith bullshit?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Dig @1.1.2    9 months ago

Yes

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.1.4  CB  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.1    9 months ago
On March 4, 2024, the claim that the Biden administration had secretly flown 320,000 migrants into the U.S. in 2023 went viral. That claim originated from a  report  by the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative think tank. The report, and its assertions, gained significant exposure when the Daily Mail  covered  it and Elon Musk shared the Daily Mail article on X (formerly known as Twitter). Former U.S. President Donald Trump also repeated the claim in his Super Tuesday  victory speech  on March 5, 2024.

The central assertions made by CIS, repeated by the Daily Mail or others, were that:

  • A Biden administration program was responsible for flying 320,000 migrants directly into the United States between January and December 2023.  (True)
  • The program was a secret whose details were discovered by an outside group.  (False)
  • The program allowed unvetted aliens to enter the United States.  (False)
  • The U.S. government admitted that the program was a national-security risk.  (False)
  • Such a program could affect U.S. politics by altering voter demographics.  (False)

Of these five claims, only the first was true. The program has never been a secret, it does not transport "unvetted" aliens, and participation in it requires significant vetting and a sponsor who is a U.S. citizen. The program provides no pathway to citizenship, which is a requirement to vote. 

The CIS report that originated the assertion that the government "admitted" the program was a national-security risk was based on a deceptive and incorrect reading of the government's  argument  in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by CIS.


Nerm, selective truth is not the whole truth. Busted.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.5  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Dig @1.1.2    9 months ago
Are you fucking kidding me? Is your intent nothing more than bad-faith bullshit?

So, tell us when you heard about this public program to fly 320,000 migrants directly to the US?  Or did the Biden administration just fail to make this program publicly known?  You'd think the border crisis czar would have at least mentioned it in passing.  Or doesn't Biden and Harris view this program as a smashing success?    An open secret is still a secret.  Biden hides a lot of things that aren't secret with help from the unbiased liberal press.

Snopes is trying to get everyone to chase squirrels to downplay the Biden administration's open-border immigration policy without providing any details.  And you are attempting to white-wash the fact that tax payer money is being used to fast track immigrants coming into the country.  Why the hell do these fast tracked immigrants need asylum?  How much bribery was involved to get a seat on the plane?  And why isn't the Biden administration guilty of human trafficking?

The Biden administration has flown a small city sized population into the United States on taxpayer money.  Is this really what Biden and Harris mean when they say the border is secure?  And I'm accused of bad-faith?  

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1.6  Dig  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.5    9 months ago
And I'm accused of bad-faith? 

Yes. You intentionally ignored everything but the simple fact that 320,000 migrants have been admitted under this program. Everything you ignored countered your narrative. That's a bad faith argument.

If you don't like Snopes, you can certainly find the same facts elsewhere. You can even go read about it on the Homeland Security website.

It's not and never was a secret.

The program was initiated as an attempt to reduce the number of people massing at the border.

They (or their sponsors) have to pay their own way, including their travel expenses (not taxpayers).

They can apply for work authorization while they're here, and if they get it and find work they'll be contributing to the economy, and also paying taxes.

If their case is ultimately denied, they'll be deported.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.7  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Dig @1.1.6    9 months ago

What this program ignores is all those people with economic skills and relatives here that wait in line for years to come here legally.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1.8  Dig  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.7    9 months ago

They are trying to come here legally, via asylum law.

It does feel like asylum law is being abused, but how do you change it without getting rid of it altogether? I mean, right now people can request asylum and their case gets judged in court. If granted, they stay. If not, they have to go. That's not exactly a flawed process. That's pretty much how it needs to be done, isn't it? How else would we do it?

I actually think that making the court process quicker, like in Lankford's bill that the Rs ran away from, would stem the tide by removing a way for people to come here for years while waiting for a judgement. That doesn't change asylum law, but still, it might make a huge difference and deter people trying to abuse the system. If claims likely to be denied get turned right back around in a matter of weeks instead of several years, then people with weak claims likely wouldn't even bother.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Dig @1.1.8    9 months ago
They are trying to come here legally, via asylum law.

No, I was writing about those applying for a Green Card, not asylum.

It does feel like asylum law is being abused, but how do you change it without getting rid of it altogether?

It definitely is as most of these applicants are facing persecution in their country do to political beliefs, religious beliefs, ect.

How else would we do it?

I like Canada’s immigration policies.

I actually think that making the court process quicker, like in Lankford's bill that the Rs ran away from,

Agree.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1.10  Dig  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.9    9 months ago

Now I'm interested in Canada's policies. I'll try to remember to check them out.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Dig @1.1.10    9 months ago

“In 1967, Ottawa introduced a points-based system for evaluating applicants, after which Canada saw a jump in immigration from Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean. A 1971 policy first articulated the government’s support for cultural diversity, and legislation in 1976 explicitly codified Canada’s commitment to refugees , mandating that federal and provincial officials develop immigration targets together. It also cast immigration as a tool for meeting the country’s cultural, economic, and social objectives.”

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.12  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Dig @1.1.6    9 months ago
Yes. You intentionally ignored everything but the simple fact that 320,000 migrants have been admitted under this program. Everything you ignored countered your narrative. That's a bad faith argument.

Yet you are ignoring the one very large, very pertinent fact to focus attention on distractions.  That's what a dirty SOB like Biden does.  

If you want some facts then read about it on the US government's propaganda network.  

So, Biden told us he was offering pre-amnesty to immigrants with a humanitarian parole.  According to the VOA, those humanitarian paroles were authorized by Biden so the optics at the border wouldn't be so negative.  (Which didn't work, BTW).  After Biden botched up another political stunt, we don't know who was brought into the country on a humanitarian parole.  We don't know where they were settled.  We don't know for certain where they came from.  We're not even sure how many were actually brought into the country by the Biden administration.  But other than those deliberate omissions, it's no secret.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1.13  Dig  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.12    9 months ago
Yet you are ignoring the one very large, very pertinent fact

Which is what, exactly?

The link you provided explains the same things I pointed out in 1.1.6

After Biden botched up another political stunt, we don't know who was brought into the country on a humanitarian parole.  We don't know where they were settled.  We don't know for certain where they came from.  We're not even sure how many were actually brought into the country by the Biden administration.

What the hell makes you think any of that? These particular people have to be registered and vetted with CBP before they can receive the advance travel authorization, and then they have to physically meet with CBP when they arrive. 

There are on record. Their sponsors are on record. They have court appointments.

Where are you getting your wild ass claims from?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    9 months ago
The latest evidence of his administration's secretive migration schemes reveals that they allowed 320,000 otherwise inadmissible migrants to fly into the country last year but won't reveal where they landed.

Well, we know where they WEREN'T sent.  We know they weren't sent to the Sanctuary Shitholes.  If they were the idiot Democrat Mayors be crying about "we can't handled illegals like we promised them!!!" and asking for money.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
3  charger 383    9 months ago

Not bad enough they are allowed to walk across the border, not US taxpayers have to pay to fly them here, in addition to all the other expenses and problems they cause. 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
3.1  Dig  replied to  charger 383 @3    9 months ago

They have to be sponsored by someone in the US.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Dig @3.1    9 months ago

There's no talking to those who consider migrants feral cats.

 
 
 
bccrane
Freshman Silent
3.1.2  bccrane  replied to  Dig @3.1    9 months ago

320,000?  Just who are these sponsors?  Human traffickers, slave owners, Joe Biden?

I know where one of the airports is, 40 miles NE of where I am as the crow flies.  Unmarked jet liners come and go and coincidentally there are unmarked white buses travelling in the night  going to and from that airport.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
3.1.3  Dig  replied to  bccrane @3.1.2    9 months ago
Just who are these sponsors?  Human traffickers, slave owners, Joe Biden?

Maybe you could find out if you made an effort.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.4  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Dig @3.1    9 months ago
They have to be sponsored by someone in the US.

No, that is false.  Biden's bogus humanitarian parole program is part of refugee status.  Asylum seekers and refugees do not need sponsorship.  Someone entering the United States on humanitarian parole is not an immigrant; they're covered by international standards and criteria for refugees.  Since the humanitarian parole is temporary they're not exactly refugees, either.

You're talking about legal immigration.  But the humanitarian parole program isn't about immigration.  There isn't a requirement for sponsorship.  And the vetting process is not as stringent.  

Here's a link to a PDF explaining humanitarian parole.    Review page 5.

Biden is pulling a bait and switch on the American public.  Apparently Biden thought that using humanitarian parole would lessen the numbers at the border so he could claim an improvement.  But it hasn't worked out that way.  Now Biden has to grant asylum to those brought into the country on humanitarian parole or deport them.  Biden really has made the problem worse with ill considered political stunts.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Dig  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1.4    9 months ago
No, that is false.

It's not false. It looks to me like you're just making shit up to cry and whine about.

 
 

Who is online

Vic Eldred


123 visitors