Corporate America Is Going Un-Woke: Reversing DEI, Sustainability Plan
By: Emily Stewart (Business Insider)
The value of anything, including woke hype, depends upon someone buying it. With Joe Biden's inflation eating away at the dollar, people don't want to spend money on warm, fuzzy, feel-good promises. The commercial exploitation of 'woke' only resulted in identity creep and increasing competition for victimhood; all of which could only be divisive.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Unilever spent years crafting its image as a corporate goody-two-shoes. The owner of Dove, Vaseline, Hellmann's, and a bunch of other brands axed quarterly reporting and earnings guidance in the name of focusing on sustainable long-term growth. Under Paul Polman, its CEO from 2009 to 2019, it said it would take into consideration all its stakeholders, not just shareholders, and set out to halve its environmental footprint — including greenhouse-gas emissions, waste, and water use — while doubling its sales over a decade. Five years and two chief executives later, Unilever is changing its tune. It's not doing a U-turn on environmental, social, and governance efforts, but it says it's being more realistic about what it can achieve and when. And, oh, those shareholders Unilever wasn't so beholden to? It's paying them a little more mind now, too.
Unilever isn't alone in this. Plenty of companies are reining in their rhetoric and in some cases action on issues such as sustainability and diversity. They're being extra cautious about weighing in on the social and political debates of the day, especially in an election year. In some cases they're telling their workers to cool it, too; Google, for example, fired more than two dozen workers for protesting its contract with Israel's government.
"Many executives have made the decision that it's sometimes safer to just be silent versus to take a stance, because they have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders and their bottom line and are very concerned about how this will be perceived," said Naomi Wheeless, a board director for Eventbrite who was formerly a global head of customer success at Square.
Call it the great un-wokening.
Over the past decade, many corporations have at least professed to take a more active role in social issues, under pressure from their customers and, more importantly, employees. Companies pushed back on North Carolina's "bathroom bill" in 2016, and when Donald Trump took the White House, many spoke out against his policies on immigration and the environment. Around that time, the Business Roundtable said it was time to rethink the purpose of a company, and BlackRock's Larry Fink expressed all sorts of thoughts about the importance of companies being responsible social stewards.
In the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020, corporate America put out endless statements about the horror of what had happened and pledged to undertake diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. An expectation arose that big businesses would take a stand on issues — if Congress wouldn't do something on guns, at least Dick's Sporting Goods would.
"You can almost say that ESG ran unopposed for a few years," said Andrew Jones, a senior researcher at the Conference Board's ESG Center.
It's a bona fide countermovement against both ESG and DEI.
Then came the backlash. Over the past couple of years there's been an uproar, especially among conservatives, about the rise of "woke capitalism." Bud Light came under scrutiny from the right when it partnered with the transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney for a small-scale Instagram campaign last spring. Then Target took heat about its Pride merchandise, with some customers destroying displays in stores over a campaign it has run for years. These high-profile examples spooked companies, which are now afraid to poke the hyped-up right-wing bear. In the market, ESG funds haven't been doing so hot. According to Morningstar, investors pulled $13 billion out of sustainable funds in 2023 amid underperformance and political unease.
"It's a bona fide countermovement against both ESG and DEI," said Philip Mirvis, an organizational psychologist and research fellow at Babson College's Social Innovation Lab. "Certainly for businesses, this is about making money. And in the conventional logic, all of these issues represent risks."
After last year's Bud Light debacle, which was a real blow to its business, executives fear they'll be the next target of some anti-woke outcry. In a 2023 Conference Board survey of more than 100 large US companies, almost half of respondents said they'd gotten some ESG backlash, and nearly two-thirds said they expected the problem to persist or get worse over the next two years. Jones told me the surveys suggest companies are antsy about mentioning DEI too much, too. He said it's not necessarily the case that companies aren't doing any work on sustainability and diversity, but they're definitely changing how they talk about it.
The chilling effect is palpable. Fink won't say "ESG" anymore because, he says, it's been "weaponized." Asset managers are quieting down on ESG as part of a "greenhushing" trend. Some companies that made a big deal about their DEI efforts in 2020 are downsizing those, too. Data provided to me by FactSet, a financial-data company, shows that mentions of ESG and DEI in S&P 500 companies' quarterly earnings calls with analysts have taken a nosedive over the past few years. For the fourth quarter of 2020, 131 companies mentioned ESG, and 34 mentioned DEI or diversity and inclusion. For the fourth quarter of 2023, those numbers dropped to 28 and four.
While the backlash has certainly driven the quieting, in some cases companies are talking less about their social commitments because they got out over their skis on their pledges. Companies such as AIG, Amazon, and ExxonMobil have scaled back some of their climate initiatives.
"We saw a lot of companies make very bold commitments — we're going to be net-zero emissions by whatever date, 2040, 2050," Jones said. "And often those commitments came but there wasn't always the underlying work."
Alison Taylor, an associate professor at New York University's Stern School of Business who wrote the book "Higher Ground: How Business Can Do the Right Thing in a Turbulent World," told me that, in her view, corporate America's about-face isn't as abrupt as it seems. C-suites have become more Republican over the past decade, and in loudly proclaiming to be do-gooders, companies have also drawn attention to their political donations, which often don't align with their rhetoric. Additionally, the issues dominating political and social discussions are much thornier than they were in the recent past — speaking out against white supremacists in Charlottesville is a bit of a gimme, weighing in on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not.
"Now what we've got is the end of Roe v. Wade, and we've got the Middle East, and we've got issues where they're much, much more divisive and difficult," Taylor said.
Taylor, a longtime skeptic of CEO activism, isn't surprised the friendly-corporation-next-door schtick has gone awry, but it has clearly caught some employees unawares. Some corporations have encouraged the creation of employee resource groups, which organize people by social identities and beliefs and in some cases embolden them to push for change. Google workers have previously participated in walkouts and protests and kept their jobs. Many were bewildered to find that this time around, the company was no longer having it. Instead, it's firing those protesting and reminding everyone, "This is a business."
"A company is not a democracy, and so all these leaders wanted to imply it was a democracy when it suited them," Taylor said. "Now it doesn't suit them."
It's unclear whether this trend of companies trying to stick to straight business is a blip or a more permanent reversal. Bud Light and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, have generally steered clear of anything that might be read as controversial since the Dylan Mulvaney debacle; their main message since then has been "We love America." Target told me it didn't have anything to share on its 2024 Pride plans yet, but it has publicly acknowledged it's likely to make some modifications.
A company is not a democracy, and so all these leaders wanted to imply it was a democracy when it suited them. Now it doesn't suit them.
Many of the people I spoke to for this story described executives as more on edge because of the election this year; come 2025, that may ease. The anti-woke crowd is extra fired up about certain issues right now, but that may not last — attention spans are short, and hot-button issues are constantly changing.
Still, companies' backing down on sustainability and diversity efforts, even temporarily, could prove short-sighted. Sure, you saved yourself a headache now, but in the long run, setting up a business to weather the climate crisis is a good bet. So is hiring diverse workers and appealing to new demographics. Despite the controversy last year, at the heart of Bud Light's campaign was an understandable business decision: It wants to appeal to a younger, more diverse consumer base.
Underlying this all is one central question: Just how "woke" are companies anyway?
Commitments to social responsibility are never far-reaching, said Kenneth Pucker, a former Timberland chief operating officer and current professor of practice at the Fletcher School at Tufts University. "It's always on the margins because the main goal of executives — the real responsibility, the way the structure of the system is organized, the way incentives work, the way the rules govern — is money making."
This may be a great un-wokening, but maybe corporate America was actually never that committed to the idea in the first place.
Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, writing about business and the economy.
Tags
Who is online
449 visitors
Gay Black women are not a commercial product. But 'woke' activists attempted to exploit the scarcity and commercial value of gay Black women. And when that resource ran out, the 'woke' activists expanded the number of identities; creating a new, improved victim to exploit the market. This ain't the first time consumers have been bilked out of their money by hype.
WTF? Usual ignorance.
How so?
Perhaps it's intended to be a self-critiquing comment?
"This ain't the first time...." You're right ! Corporate america constantly bilks people out of their money. Their marketing is directed at all of societies open wounds from bigotry to religion to greed to conflicts anywhere in the world. Their expertise at playing both ends against the middle is unmatched in history. Woke isn't the problem, it's corporate greed.
The Democratic Party is a private corporation. While the party does maintain non-profit status that doesn't exonerate its corporate activities from its own exploitation of bigotry, religion, and greed. Now here's the $64 question, are voters the consumers or are voters the product? Regardless of the answer, how can Democrat, Inc., exploitation of voters be justified?
The party corporations have made democracy a commodity to be exploited for commercial benefit. After all, the parties are only capitalizing on the party brand. So, why don't we recognize that an important source of corporate greed is Political Party, Inc.?
You didn't mention the Republican Party, the mouthpiece of corporate U.S.A. It would seem politics is now the child of money, along with religion, which happens to be the excuse for the acquisition of others. Money and Religion, both based on faith and have no intrinsic value, bigotry and greed are the motivation . Democracy to theocracy. Watch-out for Project 2025. Next spring could very well turn into a blood-bath, literally !
Woke isn't the problem, it's corporate greed
That's only because our laws are too lax. If the voters would wake up, we could pass laws that would prevent corporations exploiting people and prevent them from earning huge amounts of money!
[x][✘]
Corporations are always the boogieman of far left radicals.
Maybe he just didn't wish to start off with a blatant falsehood.
Actually I did mention that the parties (plural) are only capitalizing on party brand. But responding to Democrats' greedy agitprop naturally requires scapegoating Republicans even though Barack Obama was an insurance salesman. And Joe Biden is bailing out the financial underpinnings of higher education to alleviate academic poverty.
Where does the money come from and where does the money go?
What, exactly, is the "Commercial value" of a gay Black woman"?
And if it is significantly high-- where can I buy one?
DEI is nothing more than Affirmative Action 2.0. When AA was shut down this nonsense kicked up.