╌>

Sen. Cory Booker says Congress should hold hearings on whether insider trading on Trump's tariffs occurred

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  4 days ago  •  18 comments

By:   Megan Lebowitz (CNBC)

Sen. Cory Booker says Congress should hold hearings on whether insider trading on Trump's tariffs occurred
There is enough of an offense here, there's enough smoke here that should demand congressional hearings.

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

What a great idea, Cory.  Democrats need some sort of busy work that keeps them out of the way.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


WASHINGTON — Sen. Cory Booker said Sunday that Congress should hold hearings and defended Democratic lawmakers' calls for investigations into any possibility of insider trading after President Donald Trump encouraged people to buy stocks before reversing his tariff policy last week.

"There is enough of an offense here, there's enough smoke here that should demand congressional hearings," the New Jersey Democrat said on NBC News' "Meet the Press."

Democrats began questioning whether anyone traded improperly after Trump said on social media that "this is a great time to buy" Wednesday morning when stocks were slumping after the president's tariff rollout and then, just hours later, announced that most of the steep tariffs would be temporarily reduced, sending the stock market shooting up.

When asked whether Democrats had any evidence of anyone profiting off of Trump's announcement, Booker initially dodged the question and criticized the president's administration, emphasizing that Congress is responsible for oversight.

Asked a second time for evidence, Booker argued for hearings, adding that "these are real, legitimate, justifiable questions."

"Not to have hearings, not to do any kind of oversight undermines the faith we have in our government, undermines the trust we need in our nation right now," Booker said.

While the timing of Trump's comment and later action has drawn scrutiny from critics, Democrats have not produced evidence to support their allegations that Trump or his advisers or allies acted on insider information in making trades.

Last week, a group of 19 House Democrats sent a letter to the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission requesting an "immediate investigation into possible insider trading and market manipulation" in the days and hours leading up to the president's reversal on tariffs. Democratic senators Adam Schiff of California and Ruben Gallego of Arizona also sought answers from the White House and the U.S. trade representative on their concerns about any illegal actions related to Trump's tariff moves.

White House spokesperson Kush Desai has denied that Trump was trying to manipulate the market.

"It is the responsibility of the President of the United States to reassure the markets and Americans about their economic security in the face of nonstop media fearmongering," Desai said in a statement last week. "Democrats railed against China's cheating for decades, and now they're playing partisan games instead of celebrating President Trump's decisive action yesterday to finally corner China."

Later in the interview, Booker didn't rule out a potential run for president in 2028 when asked if he was considering one. His record-breaking House floor speech prompted speculation about his presidential ambitions. He previously ran for president in 2020.

"I'm focused on today and my re-election in '26," Booker said. "I've already announced to the people of New Jersey. I'm hoping they'll allow me to be their senator for another six years. And let's be clear, I'm proud of the work that we've done over the last six years."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    4 days ago

Democrats don't have anything else to do.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
1.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Nerm_L @1    4 days ago

So you are okay with letting, if found to be true, it just go ? Trump and billionaires in the Whithouse making billions ina morning, cause possibly, we should all be in mourning, but hey, the death of a country, for all to see, doesn't matter that much to mee, cause we sure showed them Libs. As the prices continue to soar and look forward to them soaring much more, who cares....

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1    4 days ago

The only ones opposed to this are the ones hoping to get away with it.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1    4 days ago

Were you as aggravated by shysters like Pelosi making bank with questionable trading?     No, I don’t think you were.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.3  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1    4 days ago
So you are okay with letting, if found to be true, it just go ? Trump and billionaires in the Whithouse making billions ina morning, cause possibly, we should all be in mourning, but hey, the death of a country, for all to see, doesn't matter that much to mee, cause we sure showed them Libs. As the prices continue to soar and look forward to them soaring much more, who cares....

Let me get this straight, I'm supposed to be upset with a President who publicly shares the wealth?  I'm supposed to believe that the ethically correct way to do insider trading is to keep it private, like the former Speaker of the House did?

My heart bleeds for the 1% who have been so cruelly cheated.  (BTW, if Trump profits by selling shares wouldn't that scare off investors?  Seems like Trump stuck it to himself, too.)

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
1.1.4  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.2    4 days ago

any suspected insider trading should bre investigated and if warranted, charges brought

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.2    4 days ago
Were you as aggravated by shysters like Pelosi making bank with questionable trading?

Yes.

No, I don’t think you were.

Once again you think wrong.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
1.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1.4    3 days ago

Full agreement.    Look at how fast some congresspeople become rich.

There’s your sign.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
1.1.7  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.5    3 days ago
Yes.

Very doubtful

Once again you think wrong

See above.

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
1.1.8  Thomas  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.3    3 days ago
Let me get this straight, I'm supposed to be upset with a President who publicly shares the wealth? 

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
2  Sparty On    4 days ago

And yet, no comment on his fellow Democrat  robber barons freakishly accurate trading performances.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1  JBB  replied to  Sparty On @2    4 days ago

For a group who have accused Democrats of all kinds of unproven malfeasance MAGA surely are quick to dismiss evidence of trillion dollar market manipulations without even investigating...

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Quiet
2.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  JBB @2.1    4 days ago

Whataboutism as a form of excusing current behavior does not an argument make. It only leads to ‘freakishly’ tacit approval of malicious manipulation of any standards and contempt for anyone, anywhere holding our government…ourselves…to any semblance of accountability. Just my opinion…

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.2  Snuffy  replied to  JBB @2.1    4 days ago

What evidence? Senator Booker provided no evidence, only avoided the question twice. From the seed 

When asked whether Democrats had any evidence of anyone profiting off of Trump's announcement, Booker initially dodged the question and criticized the president's administration, emphasizing that Congress is responsible for oversight. Asked a second time for evidence, Booker argued for hearings, adding that "these are real, legitimate, justifiable questions."

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JBB  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    4 days ago

MAGAs are always excusing Trump and his MAGAs on lame grounds that MAGA do not remember Democrats not doing something.

As if that were even a valid argument...

Investigations will lead where they lead.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1.4  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.2    4 days ago
What evidence? Senator Booker provided no evidence, only avoided the question twice. From the seed 

Well, ya kinda do need a few worms to go fishin'.  Booker's one of the wormiest, too.  

Make mine a Schlitz, Bubba.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
2.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  JBB @2.1    3 days ago

Nothing compared to the hypocrisy on display here.    People like Pelosi abused the system egregiously.    Well beyond most.    Where was Spartacus for that?

Silence from most of my Democrat friends …… sosdd.

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
3  Thomas    3 days ago

I am sure they can walk and chew gum at the Same Time>

 
 

Who is online