Biden's mortgage redistribution plan may burden one minority group the most: experts | Fox News
By: Michael Lee (Fox News)
Unintended consequences of virtue signaling.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Kudlow host Larry Kudlow blasts Biden's mortgage overhaul that will force good creditors to subsidize loans for higher-risk borrowers on 'America Reports.'
A Biden administration rule that will have homebuyers with good credit pay more to subsidize riskier borrowers may have a disproportionate impact on Asian Americans, who already face barriers to qualify for home lending.
Under new rules from the Federal Housing Finance Agency set to take effect May 1, borrowers with lower credit ratings and less money for a down payment will qualify for better mortgage rates than they otherwise would have, while those with higher ratings will pay increased fees.
But the burden of the new rules may disproportionately fall on Asian American homebuyers, who as a group have credit ratings that are better than any other racial demographic. According to a report by Investopedia, Asian Americans, who have an average credit score of 745, are the only racial demographic with a rating classified as "very good" by widely used FICO standards.
The 745 average credit score for Asian Americans came in 11 points higher than White Americans, who have an average credit score of 734. Asian American scores also came in ahead of Hispanic and Black Americans, who average ratings of 701 and 677, respectively.
BIDEN RULE WILL REDISTRIBUTE HIGH-RISK LOAN COSTS TO HOMEOWNERS WITH GOOD CREDIT
President Biden speaks about the economy at the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 77 facility in Accokeek, Md., April 19, 2023.(Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
A person's credit score is one of the most important indicators of creditworthiness for lenders, helping to determine if a prospective borrower will qualify for a loan and what interest rate will apply.
But those with higher scores could effectively be punished for their creditworthiness under the new rules, with experts estimating that borrowers with a score above 680 could expect to pay an extra $40 per month on a $400,000 mortgage.
Richard Stern, director of the Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget at The Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital the new rules will act like a tax increase to highly-qualified homebuyers.
US REAL ESTATE MARKET IN 'BIG TROUBLE,' EXPERT WARNS
"It is mechanically a tax increase to cover an increase in welfare. There's no other way to spin it," Stern said. "A government-sponsored entity is saying that if you have good credit, we're going to have you pay more. And we're going to use that to have other people pay less who have less money and a lower credit score."
That reality could be even harsher for Asian Americans, who have already faced barriers to homeownership despite having higher average credit scores. According to a 2021 study by the Urban Institute, Asian Americans have a lower homeownership rate (57%) than White Americans (72%).
One reason for this disparity, the study found, is that Asian Americans have higher mortgage denial rates than White Americans.
"We found that the denial rate for Asian mortgage applicants is 8.7%, compared with 6.7% for White mortgage applicants," the authors of the study wrote.
That reality comes despite Asian Americans having a higher average credit score than any other demographic.
Other factors such as income, debt-to-income ratio and geographic location all play a role in whether a loan will be approved. However, when examining Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, the study found that Asian Americans experience higher mortgage denial rates when factoring in all lending underwriting standards.
"Asian applicants are denied more frequently than White applicants at all income levels," the study notes. "In 2019, median income was $107,000 for Asian applicants and $82,000 for white applicants. For Asian applicants with annual incomes below $50,000, 16.3% were denied a mortgage, compared with 11.3% of White applicants in that income bracket."
That trend continued the higher up the income ladder individuals climb, with high-income Asian American mortgage applicants being 50% more likely to see their application denied.
The study also found that Asian Americans with similar debt-to-income ratios to White applicants also had higher rates of mortgage denial. Asian-American applications with a ratio below 30% and an income below $50,000 were denied at a rate of 11.5%, compared to 9.2% for white applicants.
Like income, that trend continues the more an applicant makes, showing Asian Americans with an income above $150,000 and a debt-to-income ratio of 43% had their applications denied at a 17.3% rate, compared to 10.7% for White applicants.
The White House(iStock)
Meanwhile, geography seemingly could not explain the barriers Asian borrowers face either.
"In metropolitan areas with large numbers of Asian mortgage applicants, we found that the denial gap persists and holds regardless of home price tier," the authors wrote, adding that the results held true in both expensive and middle- or low-price housing markets.
"This finding suggests that Asian applicants are consistently denied more frequently than White applicants, regardless of home price," the study states.
SENATE GOP SLAMS 'PERVERSE' BIDEN RULE FORCING PEOPLE WITH GOOD CREDIT TO SUBSIDIZE HIGH-RISK MORTGAGES
While the study showed a clear barrier to homeownership for Asian Americans, less is known about why the Asian applications face higher denial rates.
"More research is needed to understand why Asian homebuyers are denied mortgages more frequently than White borrowers, despite having, on average, higher credit scores and higher incomes," the study concluded. "Failing to address this denial gap would keep more potential Asian homebuyers out of homeownership and widen the homeownership gap between Asian and White households."
In the meantime, new rules that punish those with better creditworthiness could be another unwelcome obstacle for Asian Americans. According to Stern, such unintended consequences are a common byproduct of government intervention in the market.
"The reason we're having less inclusion, fewer people (making) it up the social ladder, is because the left has controlled the government for the last few decades, increasing regulations, increasing taxes, increasing the size of the government and destroying the free market enterprise system that has lifted so many people out of poverty," Stern said. "These bureaucrats and regulators aren't the ones who are going to be hurt by the collateral damage."
The White House and Federal Housing Finance Agency did not immediately respond to a Fox News request for comment.
Michael Lee is a writer at Fox News. Follow him on Twitter @UAMichaelLee
Tags
Who is online
437 visitors
Perhaps they should have thought about this move a little more and done some homework. But then again, I think most people know what this whole thing is for. Redistribution.
Just one more stupid idea coming from the bumbler in chief.
If this literally is the mechanics that would be in effect then this is both unfair and stupid. Imposing charges for good credit ratings will encourage people to reduce their credit ratings (at least to a point where it does not affect their personals borrowing needs).
Credit risk is an important factor in lending. It makes no sense to lend money to someone who cannot or will not pay it back. We all should have learned a lesson about the cancerous effect of risky mortgages from 2007.
If one cannot be responsible for a mortgage then they should be renting or buying a less expensive home.
Who do the MAGA think pays, when they default?
Better question is who do you think pays?
Lenders have always figured an expected percentage of defaults into their loan portfolios...
Which is the reason we had the housing market crash in 2008.
Which is the reason that Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank just failed.
Brandon obviously wants a repeat of 2008. With Banks already on shaky ground he will get it.
Yet markets are up due to higher profits...
The attempt to create a fight between demographic groups is unsurprising. That's been a staple of liberal politics for a long, long time. Don't ignore the effect of Biden's approach within the different demographic groups.
Biden's plan to redistribute money actually reverses affirmative action. When affirmative action really works then the beneficiaries are punished. Affirmative action was intended to provide opportunities for disadvantaged demographics to better themselves and obtain a better lifestyle. Now those who succeed with the benefit of affirmative action are required to subsidize those who do not succeed. This is just another attempt to keep disadvantaged demographics in their place.
Biden is killing affirmative action with kindness. Any step forward is required to take a step back. Biden's approach is consistent with 200 years of Democrat politics. People need to stay in their place.
The whole credit scoring game is a scam to begin with. You can pay off your cards every month and literally never carry a balance, and your credit score will not reflect this level of responsibility. Your score goes up when you have multiple credit cards with balances and no late payments. In other words, your score is best rewarded when banks are making interest money off of you and your reckless spending. It’s a sad system.