╌>

The week in whoppers: USA Today writer goes full racist against whites, Jerry Nadler totally twists special counsel's words and more

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  9 months ago  •  9 comments

By:   Post Editorial Board (New York Post)

The week in whoppers: USA Today writer goes full racist against whites, Jerry Nadler totally twists special counsel's words and more
Rep. Jerry Nadler claimed that Special Counsel Robert Hur's report "represents the complete and total exoneration" of President Biden — despite Hur testifying that he did not exonerate Biden.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Post Editorial Board

Diary of disturbing disinformation and dangerous delusions

This headline:


"Women's basketball needs faces of future to be Black."
— USA Today, March 7

We say: You can't get more racist and out-of-touch than Lindsay Schnell in her USA Today column.

She fears too many whites are headed for the WNBA, and stardom, after Iowa's Caitlin Clark snagged the spotlight as the NCAA's Division 1 all-time high scorer.

Fact is, there's no shortage of black WNBA stars; the league's more than 70% black, much like the NBA.

Besides, sports are based on merit, not skin color. Fans have been cheering great athletes of every race since even before Jackie Robinson. Memo to Schnell: That's not likely to change.

This claim:


"[Hur's report] represents the complete and total exoneration [of Biden]."

— Rep. Jerry Nadler, Tuesday

We say: Huh? Special Counsel Robert Hur himself denied his classified-documents probe "exonerated" President Biden; he merely thought a jury wouldn't convict the prez.

Yet Nadler (D-NY) wasn't the only Dem to make that claim.

"You exonerated him," insisted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). "I did not," responded Hur, prompting Jayapal to cut him off.

Can't let actual facts interfere with Dem gaslighting, can we?

This charge:


"[Republicans are] avowedly against reading. They're banning books!"

— MSNBC commentator Anand Giridharadas, Friday

We say: Do any of MSNBC's viewers actually believe such drivel?

Get opinions and commentary from our columnists


Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!

Thanks for signing up!


Enter your email address

Please provide a valid email address.

By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Never miss a story.

Check out more newsletters

Even if Giridharadas' claims are mere hyperbole, they so drastically distort reality (Republicans, even some Dems, simply oppose giving young kids access to sex-related material in schools) as to be totally nonsensical.

Except, of course, as a smear.

This warning:


"Not since . . . the Civil War have freedom and democracy been under assault here at home as they are today."

— President Biden, State of the Union, Mar. 7

We say: Biden spewed endless lies in his State of the Union address (like that he cut the deficit by $1 trillion and created 15 million jobs).

But his warning about freedom and democracy might actually be warranted.

After all, Democrats have been trying to kick candidates off ballots, blacklisting critics and seeking restrictions on speech.

Team Biden itself weaponized government agencies and worked to censor social media.

Yes, the threat's there. It's just not, as Biden implied, coming from Republicans.

Compiled by The Post Editorial Board


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.

No Trump, Fascism References, Memes, Source Dissing.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    9 months ago

Democrat think in a nutshell...............this is their shame.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    9 months ago

Jerry "No Nads" Nadler would not know exoneration even if it hit him in the face!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Nadler shows just how far into straight lying democrats talking points have devolved. They’ll claim a jury said trump raped caroll, even though the jury explicitly said he didn’t.   they’ll claim Hur exonerated Biden even though Hur said the exact opposite, repeatedly.    

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
4  Right Down the Center    9 months ago

""[Republicans are] avowedly against reading. They're banning books!"

— MSNBC commentator Anand Giridharadas, Friday

We say: Do any of MSNBC's viewers actually believe such drivel?"

Unfortunately many of them do and a few on NT prove it.  Believing things they want to be true for their narrative gets in the way of critical thinking.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Right Down the Center @4    9 months ago

It's that thing called wish fulfillment.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
5  Jeremy Retired in NC    9 months ago

This Claim:  

"[Hur's report] represents the complete and total exoneration [of Biden]."

— Rep. Jerry Nadler, Tuesday

We say:   Huh?   Special Counsel Robert Hur   himself   denied his classified-documents probe "exonerated" President Biden; he merely thought a jury wouldn't   convict   the prez.

Yet Nadler (D-NY) wasn't the only Dem to make that claim.

"You exonerated him," insisted Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). "I did not," responded Hur, prompting Jayapal to cut him off.

Can't let actual facts interfere with Dem gaslighting, can we?

Then there's this:

Hur: Biden White House Pressured Me To Change My Report Findings

Special counsel Robert Hur testified on Tuesday that the White House attempted to pressure him into changing aspects of his report on President Biden’s mishandling of classified documents.

The revelation came during Hur’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, in which Rep. Tom Tiffany, R-Wis., probed the special counsel head about a Feb. 5 letter the White House Counsel sent to Hur days before his report became public. When Tiffany asked whether the White House requested he “change [the report’s] references to the president’s poor memory,” Hur confirmed the administration did, in fact, make such a request.

“There was a request, yes,” Hur said, contradicting claims issued earlier in the hearing by Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who  asserted  Biden did not “seek to redact a single word of Mr. Hur’s report.”

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
5.1  Snuffy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5    9 months ago

Have to wonder how Nadler likes being compared to Trump.  LOL

 
 

Who is online



409 visitors