╌>

COUNTDOWN: Four days left for Kamala to schedule interview | Fox News

  
Via:  Texan1211  •  3 months ago  •  51 comments

By:   Alec Schemmel (Fox News)

COUNTDOWN: Four days left for Kamala to schedule interview | Fox News
The clock is ticking for Kamala Harris and her campaign to schedule the nominee's first formal interview.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


CNN panel clashes over Harris avoiding the press, host says 'softball interview' won't solve the issue


A CNN panel clashed on Tuesday over Vice President Harris' continued press avoidance as host Kasie Hunt said a "softball interview" wouldn't help the vice president.

The clock is ticking for Vice President Kamala Harris to schedule the formal interview she and her team promised would happen before the end of the month.

After formally receiving the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, Harris told reporters on the tarmac in Detroit earlier this month that she wanted to schedule her first formal interview as the party's nominee before the end of August. Meanwhile, the exact date, time, place and media outlet that will be conducting the interview has remained a mystery, even as Harris' self-imposed deadline quickly approaches.

With only four days left this month, questions about the interview have been prevalent inside the beltway. Some of those questions include who on the Harris campaign is making the final interview decision, what kind of message Harris will try to send and who will be the figurehead posing the questions to her

Harris campaign staffers have reportedly been asking journalists who they think the vice president should talk to, according to Politico. The outlet indicated CBS' Norah O'Donnell and NBC's Lester Holt were among the frontrunners. There has also reportedly been internal disagreements over how Harris should approach the interview.

With less than a week remaining for Harris to get something on the calendar, some journalists have begun weighing in on the process.

"I understood why Kamala Harris wasn't doing interviews before - she was getting her policy proposals hammered out behind the scenes before the convention. But now there are no more excuses. She needs to do interviews, a lot of them. We're picking a president here. It's important," said political commentator Cenk Uygur, host of The Young Turks, which describes itself as "America's largest online progressive news network."

"The fact that there is so much internal turmoil over doing A SINGLE INTERVIEW is itself deeply revealing," conservative columnist Marc Thiessen wrote Tuesday morning on X, formerly Twitter. "This is not a 'big decision.' It exposes their lack of confidence in her and is making something that should be routine into a high stakes event."

ON DODGING THE MEDIA, KAMALA HARRIS 'OWES RESPONSES' TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, SAYS CAMPAIGN ADVISOR

While the pressure on Harris to do an interview is getting greater by the day, some of her supporters have urged her to continue dodging the media. Rick Wilson, former GOP strategist and co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project, said last week that Harris "has no f---ing necessity to do interviews right now."

The same opinion was echoed by legendary Hollywood director Quentin Tarantino, who told talk show host Bill Maher last Sunday that "sometimes it's just about f---ing winning."

"I'm going to vote for her f---ing anyway, no matter what she says in the stupid f---ing interview, so don't f--- s--- up," Tarantino added.

QUENTIN TARANTINO TELLS KAMALA HARRIS TO CONTINUE DODGING INTERVIEWS UNTIL ELECTION: 'DON'T F--- S--- UP'

Harris has been utilizing a lighter than normal schedule since the Democratic National Convention concluded last week, according to Politico, which reported Harris has been using the time to prepare for her upcoming Sept. 10 debate and map out her future media strategy.

Fox News Digital reached out to both the Harris and Trump campaigns for comment. The Harris campaign did not provide a response, but the Trump campaign directed Fox News Digital to a Tuesday press release it put out, which called out Harris for going 37 days without an interview.

"Kamala is dodging the press for a reason," the press release stated. "She doesn't want to talk about her radical agenda."


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Texan1211    3 months ago
"I'm going to vote for her f---ing anyway, no matter what she says in the stupid f---ing interview, so don't f--- s--- up," Tarantino added.

Typical shit response from a single-issue voter.

See, it doesn't matter if those folks know she isn't good for the country, they will vote for her no matter what.

Harris knows that as long as she doesn't do an interview that may make a small amount of independents turn against her, her sycophantic sheep will secure her victory.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Texan1211 @1    3 months ago

“Typical shit response from a single-issue voter”

Typical shit response from one who will not vote for either candidate regardless of issue.

Tiresome, tex. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.2  Krishna  replied to  Texan1211 @1    3 months ago
Typical shit response from a single-issue voter.

What "single issue" are you talking about?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Krishna @1.2    3 months ago
What "single issue" are you talking about?

Pay attention.

"Not Trump" is what Dems are running on.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Texan1211    3 months ago
"Kamala is dodging the press for a reason," the press release stated. "She doesn't want to talk about her radical agenda."

This may not be true.  From what the press has reported, apparently she has dropped her more radical positions in the last 5 weeks after polls pointed the way to her.

Why, one said she wants to build a wall at the border now! Damn, AOC must really feel betrayed.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @2    3 months ago
one said she wants to build a wall at the border now! D

That's she running an ad using Trump's border wall to show how tough she is on immigration might be the height of absurdity. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1    3 months ago
That's she running an ad using Trump's border wall to show how tough she is on immigration might be the height of absurdity.

I have seen a video online where Harris is speaking about how tough she is and how much she knows about the border and in the background is the border wall with migrants running through. Kind of funny and damn accurate.

I put it right up there with her "We've been to the border. We have been to the border." Interviewer: "You haven't been to the border". Harris: "And I haven't been to Europe"

Classics, all, and some funnier than what could be made up!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.2  Krishna  replied to  Texan1211 @2    3 months ago
From what the press has reported, apparently she has dropped her more radical positions in the last 5 weeks

So you're criticizing her for that?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Krishna @2.2    3 months ago
So you're criticizing her for that?

I hope one day the people who hate Trump and love Harris so much will learn the distinct difference between a criticism and an observation.

I'm all for her repudiating her radical positions.

It's just that I am not gullible enough to believe her.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.3  Krishna  replied to  Texan1211 @2    3 months ago
Damn, AOC must really feel betrayed.

Why do you care so much about what AOC feels?

Certainly you note going to decide who to vote for...based on what Aoc feels?

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't do that,

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.3.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Krishna @2.3    3 months ago
Why do you care so much about what AOC feels?

I don't. You must have misinterpreted what I actually wrote.

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't do that

R-i-g-h-t.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    3 months ago
 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Greg Jones @3    3 months ago

Possible excuse if the promised interview doesn't happen by the end of the month? "I had to debate prep".

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
3.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1    3 months ago
Possible excuse if the promised interview doesn't happen by the end of the month?

See comment #3 , above jrSmiley_115_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Ronin2  replied to  Krishna @3.1.1    3 months ago

Debate, not interview.

And the debate doesn't take place before the end of the month.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    3 months ago

Doing an interview should be about  the most rountine thing a Presidential candidate does.   I guess they are lowering expectations as to her performance and as to  how she'll govern.  "She answered a question eight months ago, don't expect another one for another eight". 

But the Democrats are making it seem like it's some herculean task of momentous significance.This should be like crossing the street for an adult. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 months ago

Maybe this is the Democrats' new strategy for national elections.

Hide their candidates from as much public scrutiny as humanly possible and bank on their base being dumb enough to fall for it.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1    3 months ago

Worked in '20

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
4.1.2  Krishna  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1    3 months ago
Maybe this is the Democrats' new strategy for national elections. Hide their candidates from as much public scrutiny as humanly possible

???

Please see comment # 3, above

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  Krishna @4.1.2    3 months ago

Again, that is not an interview- it is a debate.

One that is not scheduled until Sept 10th.

Which doesn't meet her end of month timeline.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.4  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Ronin2 @4.1.3    3 months ago

He has been informed that debate and interviews are two different thing but insists on inserting debate noise for some reason.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 months ago

If by chance Harris loses, the decision not to talk to the press and even try to explain why she has changed positions on some fairly major issues may well turn out to be her "Deplorable" moment.

I don't know if ignoring the press is a good way to win an election.

Millions of Americans don't care what some Hollywood star, sports figure, Tic Toc star, median influencers, etc. have to say about anything to do with politics but are interested in why a politician would shun the press.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    3 months ago
lions of Americans don't care what some Hollywood star, sports figure, Tic Toc star, median influencers, etc. have to say about anything to do with politics but are interested in why a politician would shun the press.

What scares me is there may be millions more who care about  a celebrities endorsement than what a politician actually says. That seems to be the Democrats' opinion of the electorate. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.1    3 months ago
What scares me is there may be millions more who care about  a celebrities endorsement

hence hulk hogan.  It is rich to watch this sort of argument. Trump gets in front of a rally audience and talks about "firing " military personnel like he did on his tv show that made him a star. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.2    3 months ago
to watch this sort of argument

Why won't Kamala Harris answer questions ?   Everyone knows it will be nothing but softball questions but she won't do it. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.2.4  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.1    3 months ago
who care about  a celebrities endorsement

And most of those drooling idiot celebrities spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
4.2.5  Gazoo  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.2    3 months ago

talks about "firing " military personne”

The ones in charge of the afghan pullout disaster/fiasco deserve to be fired.
What’s actually “rich” is watching people defend a person who hadn’t done shit as vp, has been part of an admin that has made things worse for most Americans, has a history of tossing word salads, has a history of going into fits of inappropriate cackling, has a history of creating a chaotic and acidic work atmosphere, refuses to talk unscripted to the press, and flip flops away from her radical agenda. She has a track record and it sucks shit. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Gazoo @4.2.5    3 months ago

Aside from your sucky comments, I was responding to previous commenters talking about celebrities in politics. 

Trumps entire success in politics is due to his celebrity. He knows that even if you dont. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2.7  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.6    3 months ago

His celebrity led to his popularity. But most of the informed and intelligent electorate are more concerned about the issues than personalities. Your candidate is woefully lacking in likeability, charisma, and gravitas.

stg082624dAPR-800x0.jpg

Harris Campaign Flip-Flops on Yet Another Major Issue (townhall.com)

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.8  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.1    3 months ago
That seems to be the Democrats' opinion of the electorate.

I expect no more from one-issue voters.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.2.9  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.6    3 months ago
Trumps entire success in politics is due to his celebrity.

yeah, no. His celebrity lead to his popularity, but he also had CEO experience which is important when you are the head of the Executive Branch of the federal government. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
4.2.10  Gazoo  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.6    3 months ago

And i was talking about the sucky candidate you back. Can’t comment on that, i see.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
4.2.11  Krishna  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.1    3 months ago
What scares me is there may be millions more who care about  a celebrities endorsement than what a politician actually says.

Are you saying that no Republicans would ever do something like that?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.2.12  Ronin2  replied to  Krishna @4.2.11    3 months ago

No, what he is saying is that there are people vapid enough to base their decision on what some brain dead celebrity says out there who are allowed to vote.

Swifties being first and foremost. 

How will they ever decide who to vote for if Taylor doesn't tell them first?

Taylor should endorse Trump- that would prove exactly how popular she is; and how stupid sheeple are. Considering most of her fans are probably Democrats.

I fully expect her to endorse the Hyena. Wonder how many of the Swifties that would never vote for a Democrat will swallow their brain cells and vote how she says.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
4.3  Krishna  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 months ago
But the Democrats are making it seem like it's some herculean task of momentous significance.This should be like crossing the street for an adult. 

Actually it seems that some people here on NT are making it see like like its some herculean task. (I haven't heard her complaning about it all the complaining about the whole debate thing is coming from people right here on NT!)

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Krishna @4.3    3 months ago
(I haven't heard her complaning about it a

Of course not, because she doesn't talk to the media. 

plaining about the whole debate thing is coming from people right here on NT!)

Well, you seem to be confused about the whole debate vs interview thing.  Either way, you should probably have heard about those issues wherever you get your news. If not, branch out. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.3.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.3.1    3 months ago

And here's her own media reporting on how much the Harris campaign is obsessing over a  single interview, which includes the note that they can't even let Walz interview because they don't think he knows what she stands for.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 months ago
But the Democrats are making it seem like it's some herculean task of momentous significance.

Making Harris sound even remotely intelligent is that herculean task.  Look how long it's taken them to do just one interview.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5  squiggy    3 months ago

Someone entrusted to make world-shaping decisions at 3am should have mastered the language enough to sit and chat with reporters. Such a forum's not even as aggressive as a debate. She's been privy to the world's most intimate issues for four years. So, what's hiding?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
5.1  Krishna  replied to  squiggy @5    3 months ago
So, what's hiding?

She has agreed to the debate-- at first it was Trump who was avoiding uit. But now he's agreed.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Krishna @5.1    3 months ago

Yes, there will be a debate Sept 10th- which still doesn't meet her end of month timeline for an interview.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
5.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Krishna @5.1    3 months ago
She has agreed to the debate

A debate is not interview.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    3 months ago

lol, she did it!  She agreed to a JOINT interview with Tim Walz on CNN.  The woman who wants to be trusted with nukes can’t be trusted to a do a friendly interview without a man to hold her hand and supervise.

How embarrassing. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @6    3 months ago

The campaign evidently wants Harris and Walz on the same page.

I'm highly skeptical of what is going on behind the scenes.

She has been in office for about 1,400 days and has had a long record of what she stands for. Her campaign has tweeted that she has flipflopped on many of those issues. Dana Bash must find out why she moved from those firmly held positions. 

She is notoriously bad with follow up questions.

That is a lot to trust Bash with.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 months ago

That is a lot to trust Bash with.

The questions will be along the lines of 

“Trump sure is a threat to democracy, right?”

”how are you so joyful?”

It’s why she and cnn were chosen.  They probably have to submit even those types of  questions in advance as well.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
6.1.2  Krishna  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 months ago
She has been in office for about 1,400 days and has had a long record of what she stands for

And yet so many here accuse her of hiding her record. 

A bit inconsistant, eh?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  Krishna @6.1.2    3 months ago

Hypocritical when she, her campaign, and the leftist media have gone to great lengths to hide/ignore those well know views.

Why aren't the media (outside of Fox) calling the Hyena out for flip flopping?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

The interview has now been arranged.

V ice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz will be sitting down with CNN for the first joint interview after weeks of avoiding the press. 

The Democratic ticket will join CNN's Dana Bash for what's being called an "extensive interview" as they campaign in the battleground state of Georgia.

The interview will air on Thursday night at 9 p.m. ET in a primetime special. 

Kamala Harris grants first interview to CNN after weeks of avoiding press, to be joined by Tim Walz (msn.com)

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    3 months ago

I'll bring the popcorn!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
7.2  Krishna  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    3 months ago
The interview has now been arranged.

Are you sure? People here are saying she won't debate because she's afraid of it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Krishna @7.2    3 months ago
Are you sure? People here are saying she won't debate because she's afraid of it.

Enough.

Either recognize the difference between interviews and debates or just stop with this nonsense.

 
 

Who is online


JohnRussell


417 visitors