╌>

Biden admin quietly clears away border wall parts for auction before Trump takes office

  
Via:  Jeremy in NC  •  one week ago  •  101 comments

By:   Anna Young

Biden admin quietly clears away border wall parts for auction before Trump takes office
The Biden administration is reportedly spending their final weeks quietly clearing away unused border wall materials at the southern border to put up for auction -- a move characterized by some lawmakers as an apparent ploy to sabotage President-elect Donald Trump's goal to secure the US-Mexico border.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The Biden administration is reportedly spending their final weeks quietly clearing away unused southern border wall materials to put up for auction — a move characterized by some lawmakers as an apparent ploy to sabotage President-elect Donald Trump's goal to secure the US-Mexico border.

Alarming footage taken by a US Customs and Border Agent captured numerous flatbed trucks hauling away dismantled sections of the steel wall near Tucson, Arizona - a hotspot for illegal crossings - with the agent estimating a half-mile's worth of parts are being removed daily, The Daily Wire reported.

"They are taking it from three sections: Nogales, Tucson, and Three Points," the agent, who spoke under the condition of anonymity, told the outlet.

aerial-image-shows-migrants-waiting-95245461.jpg?w=1024

"The goal is to move all of it off the border before Christmas."

The materials are being transported to Pinal Airpark in Marana, Arizona, where it's being sold through GovPlanet, an online auction house specializing in military surplus, with bidding starting at just $5.

Online auctions for the parts — listed as Steel Bollard Wall Sections w/Grout — already happened this month, with another scheduled for Dec. 18.

2024-washington-dc-president-joe-95245230.jpg?w=1024

The materials were left unused following Biden's decision to stop the wall's construction and roll back Trump's immigration policies upon taking office in 2021, resulting in a massive surge of illegal immigrants and unaccompanied minors crossing the southern border.

Up to $300 million worth of taxpayer-funded wall components have been left to rust since Biden came to office, Republicans have said, condemning the Democratic president for worsening the migrant crisis.

mexican-side-conduct-tours-area-95245467.jpg?w=1024

Now lawmakers believe this effort to sell the wall leftovers - which the Biden administration also did last August - will undermine Trump's plan to secure the southern border.

"The Biden Administration is well aware they shouldn't have reversed the construction of the border wall," Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) told The Daily Wire.

"If it's true, they're purposefully hamstringing an incoming president, it wouldn't be shocking. Why would they want to see President Trump succeed with policies they aggressively sabotaged."

section-border-wall-el-paso-95245472.jpg?w=1024

The soon-to-be 47th president has long maintained that border security will be his top concern when he assumes office in January, regardless of the cost. His plans include resuming construction of the wall along the border and launching a mass deportation effort that will initially target those convicted of crimes.

Trump pledged to build "an impenetrable, physical, tall, power, beautiful southern border wall" as a cornerstone of his victorious 2016 campaign for the White House.

He spent $15 billion during his presidency to install about 450 miles of barriers, with 250 additional miles in progress at the end of his term.

u-s-president-donald-trump-95162451.jpg?w=1024

"When Trump comes back, and he wants to start the border wall all over again, the whole entire funding fight is gonna happen again," the border patrol agent told the outlet.

"That's their play. He's gonna have to fight for this — again."

The White House did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.


Red Box Rules

Taunting, spamming, and off topic comments will be removed at the discretion of group mods.

NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, reply to themselves or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted.

Quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.

Calling members "trolls", "dishonest", references to "MAGA", fascism, memes, personal insults and death wishing will result in your comment being deleted.

All of NT's rules apply


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    one week ago

Even in his last days as POTUS he's fucking things up and costing the citizens BILLIONS.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    one week ago
Even in his last days as POTUS he's fucking things up and costing the citizens BILLIONS.

He's selling the shit.  He is making money off the crap.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    one week ago

He isn't making jack shit compared to the cost..........from the article...........

with bidding starting at just $5

With starting bids of $5, some scrappy is going to be a millionaire.........Stupid ass should have kept the project going. But then, how could the cheap labor, sex and drug trafficking continue?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.2  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    one week ago
He is making money off the crap.

Which is illegal.  But it's not like Democrats have ever worried about what's legal and illegal before.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.1    one week ago
He isn't making jack shit compared to the cost.

Correct. It is used. Has anyone made a profit selling used equipment compared to the new price?

Stupid ass should have kept the project going.

[]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.2    one week ago

[]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    one week ago
MAGA people who, themselves, have no clue what a ladder, shovel, or reciprocating saw are?

[] No Google fact-check information was found for claim: 'MAGA people who, themselves, have no clue what a ladder, shovel, or reciprocating saw are?'

Try expressing the claim in terms of a few strong keywords and avoid full sentences.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.6  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.4    one week ago
Which is illegal.
Nope, that's a lie.

So it's NOT illegal for a politician to sell off government property and pocket the money?  What world do you live in?

But it's not like Democrats have ever worried about what's legal and illegal before.
Says the guy who supports a 34 count felon and rapist.

Why are you deflecting all of the sudden?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.7  bugsy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    one week ago

He is selling those things for pennies on the dollar. Each one goes for 5 dollars and the government is estimated to lose 10 grand on each panel.

Where do you think the money goes?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.1.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  bugsy @1.1.7    one week ago
Where do you think the money goes?

Probably to the scrapping organization where Hunter Biden was just made executive VP with a 10% signing bonus going to  someone named "Big Guy".

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.9  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.8    one week ago

My guess is zero of it is going into the government coffers. 
Remember, Harris put the DNC in 20 million in debt. Would not doubt it goes to pay off that debt.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.10  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    one week ago
Has anyone made a profit selling used equipment compared to the new price?

Clearly you’ve never collected well.    I’ve sold many cars for more than I had in them.    I have a JD 3120 tractor right now that is worth more than I paid for it ten years ago.

Guess that level of finance is beyond your experience.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.1.11  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    one week ago
Has anyone made a profit selling used equipment compared to the new price?

Does it make sense to sell something when you are going to turn around and buy the same thing?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1.12  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    one week ago
Correct. It is used.

No, your assumption is false. It's right up there in the seed, he is selling off unused material.

clearing away unused southern border wall materials to put up for auction 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.13  bugsy  replied to  Snuffy @1.1.12    one week ago
he is selling off unused material.

Or as collectors like to call it "old stock".

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.14  Ozzwald  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.10    one week ago
Clearly you’ve never collected well.

We're talking chunks of metal.[]

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1.15  MrFrost  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.6    one week ago
So it's NOT illegal for a politician to sell off government property and pocket the money? 

I look forward to your proof that the money is going into Biden's pocket. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.16  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.14    one week ago

You’re the one who called “chunks of metal” equipment.

[X][]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.17  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.16    one week ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.18  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.15    4 days ago
I look forward to your proof that the money is going into Biden's pocket.

Politicians take money from doners or embezzle campaign funds which are donations from party supporters. It's very uncommon to hear about a politician simply pocketing federal government money from sold government assets that requires a lot of accounting and is subject to mandatory audit and review. But according to the Qanon kooks they believe every Democrat's doing it, not just the ones who are really lizard aliens or that run the child sex dungeons.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1.19  MrFrost  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.18    yesterday
not just the ones who are really lizard aliens

Let's not forget that the Earth is flat and the ocean is above us. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.20  Sparty On  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.19    21 hours ago

Yes and Biden had the mental acuity to be President.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.21  George  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.20    20 hours ago

With some of the stuff we have seen from democrats.....Biden may have been the smartest one in the room, even in the advanced stages of Alzheimer's. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.22  Sparty On  replied to  George @1.1.21    19 hours ago
Biden may have been the smartest one in the room,

A very scary thought ……

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
2  charger 383    one week ago

 By the way some use the term this could be considered treason

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  charger 383 @2    one week ago

As soon to be a private citizen, can he be charged with treason. Are these actions considered to be within his powers as president?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    one week ago
Are these actions considered to be within his powers as president?

While distasteful I'm willing to bet this action is within his powers as president.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    one week ago
As soon to be a private citizen, can he be charged with treason.

No, presidential immunity, remember? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    one week ago

They love their open borders. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4  Ozzwald    one week ago

Anybody that believes a fence will create a secure border is late for their elementary school class right now.                                                                                                          .

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4    one week ago

So why is there a fence around the White House? 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1    one week ago
So why is there a fence around the White House?

If a fence would stop people, why is there a shit ton of secret service stationed at the Whitehouse?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.1.2  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.1    one week ago

You didn't answer the question.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.3  bugsy  replied to  charger 383 @4.1    one week ago

So why is there a fence around the White House’

Or around the DNC?

Or Joe’s multi million dollar houses on the beach?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.4  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.1    one week ago

To prevent most and slow the rest down for armed guards to deal with 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Guide
4.1.5  goose is back  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.1    one week ago
If a fence would stop people,

A fence does stop people.  If you elect to breach it, you then become a criminal. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.2    one week ago
You didn't answer the question.

I did.  A fence is there simply to indicate where you can and cannot go.  Secret service is there to stop you from simply climbing the fence.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.7  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.4    one week ago
To prevent most and slow the rest down for armed guards to deal with

So you are admitting that a fence only slows some down and a 24/7 security contingent is necessary to actually stop them all.  Thank you for confirming my post.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.8  Ozzwald  replied to  goose is back @4.1.5    one week ago
If you elect to breach it, you then become a criminal.

Automatically?  So when I jumped fences to retrieve footballs when I was younger it magically made me a criminal?  Even though there was no punishment associated?  No trial?  No arrest?  jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.7    one week ago
nd a 24/7 security contingent is necessary to actually stop them all.

Lol. The pathetic "if its not 100% effect it shouldn't be done"  argument. Why do you even bother with such a transparently silly  claim?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.10  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.7    one week ago

I support 24/7  ARMED security behind s secure fence.  When you need to keep things secure you start with No Trespassing signs and a fence.   

A fence is the first part of securing an area. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.11  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.9    one week ago
The pathetic "if its not 100% effect it shouldn't be done"  argument.

NO. 

You are claiming that a fence would create a secure border.  I keep showing you just how much bullshit that claim is.  Then, as usual, you start moving the goalposts claiming that you didn't say "secure border" you said "more secure border", but then you shit your pants when I ask you to quantify your "more secure" statement.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.12  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.10    one week ago
A fence is the first part of securing an area.

No its not.  A simple "no trespassing" sign is as effective as a lame ass fence.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.13  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.12    one week ago

A fence is to make it easier for the armed border security to capture the illegal invaders who get past it and to make it obvious that they are not wanted on the other side..   

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.14  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.13    one week ago
A fence is to make it easier for the armed border security to capture the illegal invaders who get past it

How? 

Remember, according to your question they are already past it.  So how does something they've already past, make apprehension easier?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.15  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.14    one week ago

Fewer get through, slows up and easier to capture.  If have to chase them the fence lowers area they can escape to. As an example; If a groundhog or rabbit gets in my garden the dog chases it to the fence and can catch it easier than in open ground.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.16  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.15    6 days ago
Fewer get through, slows up and easier to capture. 

Prove it.

If have to chase them the fence lowers area they can escape to.

Again, if it gets to that point they've already gotten past the fence.

As an example; If a groundhog or rabbit gets in my garden the dog chases it to the fence and can catch it easier than in open ground.  

So you are saying that your fence cannot even keep out a dumb rabbit. 

If you truly want to compare that, take down all except 1 side of the fence around your yard, and move your house out of the way, since a border fence would not enclose anything.  So you only have 1 straight strip of fence,  Now let's see how your dog does.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.17  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.16    5 days ago
"Fewer get through, slows up and easier to capture. 
       Prove it." If proof of that is needed and the obvious can not be accepted   As said in post #4  "might be late to elementary school" 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.18  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.16    5 days ago
       "So you are saying that your fence cannot even keep out a dumb rabbit"
Varmints can get in because part of the fence was built by and is supposed to be maintained by others ,I care more about keeping dogs in.  But the example is valid because the fence is still an obstacle in either direction and it is not easy to get though the weak place.     
.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.19  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.17    5 days ago
If proof of that is needed and the obvious can not be accepted

So you can't prove.  That's all you had to say.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.20  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.12    5 days ago

Not so!   I can walk past a no trespassing sign but crossing a fence requires more effort.   

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.21  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.18    5 days ago
Varmints can get in because part of the fence was built by and is supposed to be maintained by others

Excuses.  You didn't Trump was going to build his fence, did you?  Nope, "others" were going to build it.

But the example is valid because the fence is still an obstacle in either direction and it is not easy to get though the weak place.

You used the example as it making it easier for your dog to catch the rabbit.  The border fence is only 1 straight section of fence.  It's easier for your dog because your fence "encloses" your back yard, making it a much much smaller area for your dog.  Border fence does not "enclose" anything, which is why your example is bullshit.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.22  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.19    5 days ago

Proof is obvious, refusing to accept  the obvious is all you had to say. 

I do not know of any study to prove fences work or why anybody would waste time on studying something that obvious.   

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.23  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.21    5 days ago

the dog usually gets the varmint on the 340 foot long straight section before it gets to a corner.  The claim of enclosure being needed dos does not work

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.24  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.22    5 days ago
Proof is obvious

Which is why you are either unable to, or unwilling to provide any???

I do not know of any study to prove fences work

Yet you keep making the claim.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.25  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.23    5 days ago
the dog usually gets the varmint on the 340 foot long straight section before it gets to a corner.  The claim of enclosure being needed dos does not work

Of course he does.  You must be so proud.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.1.26  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.12    5 days ago
No its not. 

So in 5 deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, we've been securing everythying wrong? 

A simple "no trespassing" sign is as effective as a lame ass fence

Only to an idiot.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.27  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.25    4 days ago

Of course I am, she is a Good dog

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.28  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.24    4 days ago

Fences protect things, Handrails make steps safer, Don't eat the yellow snow  something are self evident

Does not take much to understand that

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.29  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.26    4 days ago
So in 5 deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, we've been securing everythying wrong?

If all you do is put up a fence with no additional security, YES YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.30  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.28    4 days ago
Fences protect things

How?  I've been asking this for years.  How does a fence protect anything when it can be so extremely easily circumnavigated?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.31  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.30    4 days ago

Fences and walls are good, armed security makes them better.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1.32  Sparty On  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.26    4 days ago
Only to an idiot.

Reminds me of an old Bob & Tom parody:

[jrEmbed module="jrYouTube" youtube_id="aZTarX7KjUo"]

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.33  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.24    4 days ago
Yet you keep making the claim.

I make the claim because it is obvious.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.34  Sean Treacy  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.33    4 days ago

Humans figured this out thousands of years ago. That people still claim to not understand that physical barriers impede movement is truly one of the wonders of the world.   

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.35  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.31    4 days ago
Fences and walls are good, armed security makes them better.

That's correct.  Too bad Trump's border security consists solely of a simple fence.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.36  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.33    4 days ago
I make the claim because it is obvious.

Obviously wrong.  I have asked repeatedly how a fence would stop a person determined to get to the other side, the best anyone can offer is "just because".

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1.37  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.35    4 days ago

That's correct.  Too bad Trump's border security consists solely of a simple fence.

Really? He's gonna shut down the Border Patrol? Do show where that was in the plans. 
 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.38  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @4.1.37    4 days ago
Really? He's gonna shut down the Border Patrol?

No he was putting up a fence where there was no border patrol, or in poorly patrolled areas.

[] Remember, there are over 2000 miles of border. How many patrol officers do you think it would take to patrol that 2000 miles on a 24/7 basis? Are you willing to pay more taxes to pay for those border agents?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1.39  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.38    3 days ago

You're the one who said his border security consists solely of a simple fence. You ignore the obvious to play partisan games to bitch about Trump. There are stretches of the border where there is only a single strand of barbed wire and in some areas nothing at all. So a fence at least slows things down. Add in drones, cameras and other electronic surveillance and the ability for border patrol to get to an area where people are attempting to cross becomes easier. I do miss the days of common sense.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.40  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @4.1.39    3 days ago
You're the one who said his border security consists solely of a simple fence.

For most of the fence it is.

There are stretches of the border where there is only a single strand of barbed wire and in some areas nothing at all.

Thank you for supporting my statement.

So a fence at least slows things down.

No evidence for that.  Especially in remote areas where the fence is just cut open.  Doesn't slow anyone down there.

Add in drones, cameras and other electronic surveillance and the ability for border patrol to get to an area where people are attempting to cross becomes easier.

For a 2000 mile border?  The vast majority of the border is not patrolled, no cameras, no drones. 

If you want a "more" secure border you need something other than a 15th century solution.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.41  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.40    2 days ago

Since vaccines don't keep everybody who takes them from getting sick, do you have the same opinion of them?  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.42  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.41    2 days ago
Since vaccines don't keep everybody who takes them from getting sick, do you have the same opinion of them?

Wow, you recognize that you have a losing argument so you decide to turn completely off track.  You want to talk about vaccines?  Seed an article about them, otherwise stop trying to change the subject.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.43  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.42    2 days ago

I am again making a valid comparison.  You complain if a few get by a fence is not good so comparing a fence to vaccine that protects many but not all. is fair   

History and use proves my position. 

Places that need security, have valuables present, are dangerous, where privacy is wanted  or it is desired to keep people in or out use fences

  

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.1.44  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.42    2 days ago

Would you want to be in a class where on tests 100% was only passing grade and 99% was failing?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.45  Ozzwald  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.43    2 days ago
I am again making a valid comparison.

You want it to be valid?  1st produce verifiable numbers. 

  • What percentage of people taking the vaccines either did not contract COVID or had their symptoms minified?
  • What percentage of illegals are thwarted at the border by only an existing fence?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1.46  Sparty On  replied to  charger 383 @4.1.43    yesterday

[]

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
4.2  squiggy  replied to  Ozzwald @4    one week ago

What's all that shit around the White House perimeter?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.2.1  Ozzwald  replied to  squiggy @4.2    one week ago

What's all that shit around the White House perimeter?

Wow, you guys are great at supporting my statement.

Guarding the White House

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.2.2  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @4.2.1    one week ago

You great at dodging the question.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Sparty On  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.2    one week ago

Sad but true.    It’s all the butthurt have left.   Denial and lies.    

Lost the Executive, House and Senate handily and they still haven’t made the connection.

Poor bubba’s ……

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.2.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.2    one week ago
You great at dodging the question.

I have lost track of how many times you have disappeared from a comment thread when I ask you a question.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.2.5  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @4.2.4    5 days ago

Ask a coherent question and I'll respond.  Keep up the Kamala Harris speaking and it gets ignored.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.3  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @4    one week ago

This action just follows his border policy

Biden did nothing to secure the border.    Quite the opposite.    

Only a moron could define it otherwise

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
4.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ozzwald @4    one week ago

Are you suggesting a border wall would not make the border more secure than a border with no wall?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.5  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4    5 days ago

Why do insurance companies want you to put a fence around a pool?

To keep people out, protect the property and reduce liability

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.6  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4    5 days ago

By that logic, If a missile gets through it, Israeli should abandon it's Iron Dome and other missile defense systems 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.7  charger 383  replied to  Ozzwald @4    4 days ago

Since elementary schools have been brought up, I notice fences have been put up at many schools for security and safety.  School administrators, security experts, police and legislatures that approve funding think fences work.    

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
4.7.1  Gazoo  replied to  charger 383 @4.7    4 days ago

I notice fences have been put up at many schools for security and safety.”

I wonder why? They obviously don’t stop anyone, let alone slow them down./s/

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
5  charger 383    one week ago

As a soon to be private Citizen, Selling off this material should be considered in any government provided security for Biden as a former President

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
6  squiggy    one week ago

There won't be any 'T's left on the keyboards if Mr. Scorchedearth keeps at it. Purely in spite of the people paying the bills.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7  Right Down the Center    one week ago

"The Biden administration is reportedly spending their final weeks quietly clearing away unused border wall materials at the southern border to put up for auction -- a move characterized by some lawmakers as an apparent ploy to sabotage President-elect Donald Trump's goal to secure the US-Mexico border."

Not that we needed it but that is just more proof that Biden is a petty vindictive lying Prick.

Expected response:   But but but Trump!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @7    one week ago

I’ll be honest. 
I bet Joe has no idea this is happening. 
Would not doubt it if it is one of his open border lackeys that did this. Possibly Mayorkas himself gave the OK.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  bugsy @7.1    one week ago
I bet Joe has no idea this is happening. 

Joe does remind me of Colonel Henry Blake when Radar brings him papers to sign and just say's don't read, just sign.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
8  Sparty On    one week ago

Anyone that voted for Biden should be ashamed of themselves.

Big time

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
8.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sparty On @8    one week ago
Anyone that voted for Biden should be ashamed of themselves.

As should anyone that was part of the big lie trying to convince Americans that Joe was capable of being president for another four years.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
8.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Right Down the Center @8.1    one week ago
Joe was capable of being president for another four years.

I didn’t think he was capable for first four years and I was right  ….. too bad so many failed to realize that in 2020.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
9  MrFrost    one week ago
The Biden administration is reportedly spending their final weeks quietly clearing away unused border wall materials at the southern border to put up for auction 

LMAO!!!!! 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
10  Ronin2    one week ago

This massive loss of selling off border wall materials for pennies on the dollar is on top of the costs to guard the unused materials in the first place.

That is not including material that was stolen and taken to Mexico; or was lost/used by a couple of idiots in Weslaco used it to create "patio structures".

Democrats love to claim they are the party of "fiscal responsibility"- how is this in any way fiscally responsible?

The Biden administration is trying to damage this country and the world on his way out the door.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
10.1  Sparty On  replied to  Ronin2 @10    one week ago
The Biden administration is trying to damage this country

This is nothing new.    

The Biden cabal has been doing that since he was inaugurated.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
11  Nerm_L    one week ago

Just remember that Prez. Biden 46 gave the okey dokey for using anti-personnel munitions and materials to defend another border.  Land mines and razor wire can fill the gaps.  

If its good enough for Quagmire Joe then its good enough for anyone.

 
 

Who is online




292 visitors