╌>

Appeals court disqualifies DA Fani Willis from prosecuting Trump Georgia case

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  2 days ago  •  17 comments

By:   NBC News

Appeals court disqualifies DA Fani Willis from prosecuting Trump Georgia case
A Georgia appellate court Thursday disqualified Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and removed her from prosecuting Donald Trump and co-defendants in a case she brought over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Dec. 19, 2024, 2:56 PM UTCBy Ginger Gibson and Alana Satlin

A Georgia appellate court Thursday disqualified Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and removed her from prosecuting Donald Trump and co-defendants in a case she brought over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The decision is likely to cripple the case and bring a halt to the efforts to try Trump and his allies for their efforts to overturn his loss. Federal prosecutors have already dropped Trump's federal criminal case related to the 2020 election in the wake of his winning the presidency.

"After carefully considering the trial court's findings in its order, we conclude that it erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office," the court said, referring to an earlier ruling that allowed Willis to remain on the case. Willis had been under scrutiny over her relationship with a special prosecutor on the case, Nathan Wade. Trump and other co-defendants had requested to have Willis removed from the case.

Trump's team and the DA's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The court did not go so far as to completely dismiss the case, andGeorgia law allows for the case to be assigned to a different county prosecutor in the state. But legal experts have said that is likely to be a difficult task given the complicated, political and novel nature of the case brought by Willis.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAffee had found that an "appearance of impropriety" was created by Willis' romantic relationship with Wade and determined one of the two needed to leave the case. Within hours of that decision, Wade resigned.

But the appellate court said McAffee's decision did not prevent the "appearance of impropriety."

"The remedy crafted by the trial court to prevent an ongoing appearance of impropriety did nothing to address the appearance of impropriety that existed at times when DA Willis was exercising her broad pretrial discretion about who to prosecute and what charges to bring," the court said. "While we recognize that an appearance of impropriety generally is not enough to support disqualification, this is the rare case in which disqualification is mandated and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings."

Ginger Gibson

Ginger Gibson is the senior Washington editor for NBC News Digital.

Alana Satlin

Alana is a politics editor at NBCNews.com based in New York.

Charlie Gile contributed.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off-topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, respond to themselves, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) you are replying to preserve the continuity of this seed. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion

No Fascism References, Memes, Source Dissing.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    2 days ago

One more down, two more to go......................

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    2 days ago

I don't know that this is the end of it. The DA's office may appeal to the State Supreme Court.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Snuffy @1.1    2 days ago

At this point the spectacle is putting Democrats and Willis in a horrendous light. If they want to continue their shit show let them.

Seems losing an election to Trump; as well as the House and Senate wasn't enough to teach them anything.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.2  evilone  replied to  Snuffy @1.1    2 days ago
I don't know that this is the end of it. The DA's office may appeal to the State Supreme Court.

This indictment still stands. The DA's office can still have anyone else from the office try the case and/or as you say, file an appeal to keep Willis on it.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.1    2 days ago
Seems losing an election to Trump; as well as the House and Senate wasn't enough to teach them anything.

This temper tantrum goes back to losing the 2016 election.  They've never recovered and the 2024 election has pushed many over the edge.  

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1.4  Snuffy  replied to  evilone @1.1.2    2 days ago

This indictment still stands. The DA's office can still have anyone else from the office try the case and/or as you say, file an appeal to keep Willis on it.

While the indictment still stands, from my understanding Willis cannot have someone else from her office try the case as she and her entire office have been disqualified.
The appeals court found that Willis’ office can’t prosecute the case, so a new special prosecutor would need to be appointed for the case to continue.
Continued reading of the above link does state that Willis is going to contest this ruling. If a new special prosecutor would still need to be appointed, then this would bring in the state board to find another DA who would be willing to take the case on including the RICO charges which seemed to be an overreach when it was first brought. 
Anyway one looks at this, the case is not yet finished and will play on for a few more years.
 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.5  evilone  replied to  Snuffy @1.1.4    2 days ago
...from my understanding Willis cannot have someone else from her office try the case as she and her entire office have been disqualified.

hmmm.... That's a significant wrinkle. Thanks for the clarification.

Anyway one looks at this, the case is not yet finished and will play on for a few more years.

It will be a thorn in Trump's side his whole term.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @1.1.5    yesterday
"It will be a thorn in Trump's side his whole term."

No it won't. Most people have already forgotten about it.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.7  Ronin2  replied to  evilone @1.1.5    yesterday

Again, Democrats and their media sycophants can try to continue to play this up; but as the election showed the non TDS driven have moved on. There aren't enough TDS driven morons left to care.

If Dems want to set themselves up for bigger losses in 2026 and 2028 they need to continue to concentrate on Trump and only Trump. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    2 days ago

Good news. It took them long enough!

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2  George    2 days ago

I see a run for the presidency in her future. democrats are famous for picking unlikable candidates.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 days ago

The amount of time and money wasted on these tantrums is mind boggling.

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
4  freepress    2 days ago

The case wasn't dismissed, only her presiding over it. The case is open to be picked up by another prosecutor. However President Musk will probably make sure justice is delayed or denied.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1  Greg Jones  replied to  freepress @4    yesterday

No one will give the slightest shit four years from now,

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Greg Jones @4.1    yesterday
No one will give the slightest shit four years from now,

I'm not sure how many do now.  It's a small number.

 
 
 
Robert in Ohio
Professor Guide
5  Robert in Ohio    yesterday

She should have been disqualified from the prosecution of the case months ago

Her disqualification does not detract from the guilt (or perhaps innocence in some minds) of the individuals charged but likely totally derail the case.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6  Sparty On    21 hours ago

Trump smokes em again.     TDS spools up even stronger …..

 
 

Who is online



253 visitors