╌>

Susan Collins draws outrage as she shows her true colors in two new statements - Alternet.org

  
Via:  Trout Giggles  •  3 years ago  •  18 comments

By:   Alternet. org

Susan Collins draws outrage as she shows her true colors in two new statements - Alternet.org
U.S. Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) is under mounting criticism for refusing to support a Democratic bill that would make access to abortion the law of the land, as the U.S. Supreme Court, experts believe, prepares to reverse its historic 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade.Senator Collins, who repeatedly clai...

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads

I thought she was pro-choice?


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


image.jpg?width=1245&quality=85&coordinates=0%2C11%2C0%2C11&height=700 Joy Holder, U.S. Senate Photographic Studio David Badash and The New Civil Rights MovementSeptember 22, 2021

U.S. Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) is under mounting criticism for refusing to support a Democratic bill that would make access to abortion the law of the land, as the U.S. Supreme Court, experts believe, prepares to reverse its historic 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade .

Senator Collins, who repeatedly claims to be pro-choice, is being criticized after years of supporting then-President Donald Trump's judicial nominees at every level of the federal judiciary, including two of his three Supreme Court picks.

According to the progressive group Suit Up Maine, Collins voted to confirm of 208 of Trump's judicial nominees. She voted to confirm Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, but against Amy Coney Barrett, reportedly because she felt the vote should not take place so close to an election. But Collins did vote to put Barrett on the federal bench in 2017.

The anger against Collins on social media has been palpable Wednesday, but it may be about to get worse.

According to NBC News affiliate News Center Maine, Collins just endorsed former Maine Republican Governor Paul LePage for a third term. LePage was term-limited after two consecutive terms, but announced in April he is running once again.

For those who don't remember, LePage is a Trump acolyte known for making outrageous and vulgar remarks, is anti-choice, anti-LGBTQ, and pro-death penalty. He opposes legalization of marijuana, opposes renewable energy, supports "school choice," opposes ObamaCare, wants to reduce the number of hospitals in the state, and has made racist remarks.

This was Gov. LePage in 2016:

The Governor of Maine. https://t.co/UjjVZYEscA — Adam Parkhomenko (@Adam Parkhomenko) 1472265764.0

"As Maine recovers from the pandemic, Paul is the best candidate to grow our economy," Collins said Wednesday in a pre-recorded video endorsing LePage, who once called himself "Baby Trump."

#BREAKING Sen. Susan Collins has endorsed Paul LePage for Governor via video message. During her speech, there were… https://t.co/sXtsqNkCB8 — Sean Stackhouse (@Sean Stackhouse) 1632347124.0

The outpouring of outrage against Collins is tremendous.

The fact that Susan Collins won't participate in this last chance to save Roe tells you all you need to know https://t.co/QlScePu8Cx — Molly Jong-Fast (@Molly Jong-Fast) 1632344257.0

Typo here. Should read "Sen. Susan Collins, who says she supports abortion rights but votes to confirm anti-choice… https://t.co/35g66kmQ4K — Jamison Foser (@Jamison Foser) 1632340742.0

First, Senator Susan Collins lied and told us Brett "cries over beer" Kavanaugh wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade Now… https://t.co/cfQnFt8RKQ — Lindy Li (@Lindy Li) 1632344240.0

Susan Collins doesn't actually support abortion rights. Why is this hard to grasp? https://t.co/tYa4oerTi2 — Pe (@Pe) 1632341289.0

Susan Collins is anti-choice. This shouldn't surprise anyone. — Chris Hahn (@Chris Hahn) 1632346616.0

It's almost as if Susan Collins isn't really pro-choice after all. https://t.co/HiPJrZfZTE — Molly Jong-Fast (@Molly Jong-Fast) 1632343472.0

Susan Collins does not support abortion rights. Hello?!! Supporters of reproductive choice don't hand control of t… https://t.co/4SFRwAH7nA — The Hoarse Whisperer (@The Hoarse Whisperer) 1632342217.0

I have no words left for the hypocrisy of Susan Collins. https://t.co/mZlHo2HLHU — Ilyse Hogue (@Ilyse Hogue) 1632341413.0

Most of the time, political endorsements are rooted in ideological alliances or self-interest. In some rare situat… https://t.co/QB1hgbUm1d — Dean Barker (@Dean Barker) 1632350039.0

Today, @SenSusanCollins has: ❌ Opposed abortion rights for women ❌ Endorsed racist bigot Paul LePage ❌ Opposed f… https://t.co/lPOPIcBUdy — Protect Robert Mueller ✊ (@Protect Robert Mueller ✊) 1632342980.0

From Your Site Articles

  • When Republicans attack Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for having been ... '

Related Articles Around the Web

  • Van Hollen, Manchin, Collins, Colleagues Introduce Resolution to ... '
  • Sen. Collins 'just wants to have fun' | newscentermaine.com '
  • NARAL Pro-Choice America Condemns Senator Susan Collins ... '

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Trout Giggles    3 years ago

trolling, taunting, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
2  Veronica    3 years ago

Answer just bumping

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3  Split Personality    3 years ago

My understanding is that she upset by the same nonsense we see here daily,

that doctors need to be protected from being forced to do abortions against their will

She and a handful of other R Senators are drawing up their own version of protecting Roe as is

The bill would “codify” Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion.

But Collins said it would weaken the Religious Freedom Restoration Act , which prohibits the government from burdening the exercise of religion.

"This ‘carve out’ would be unprecedented, and I do not believe it is necessary to codify Roe,” she told the paper.

Collins said she is discussing a potential bill that "truly would codify Roe," the Times reported.

In practice people seeking abortions go to places the specialize in those procedures.

People seeking sex changes go the 25 specialists in this country who do that

and none of them are being forced against their religious beliefs.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Split Personality @3    3 years ago
that doctors need to be protected from being forced to do abortions against their will

I am not aware of 1 single example of this.  Perhaps you can provide some...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Ozzwald @3.1    3 years ago
I am not aware of 1 single example of this. 

Neither am I.

Perhaps you can provide some...

You would probably have to ask XX, it's one of his pet peeves.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.1    3 years ago
Neither am I.

But but but you're the one who said it.  Why would you put forth that statement if you know of no examples for it?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.3  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @3.1.2    3 years ago

C'mon, Guys. There's no fighting in the War Room

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  seeder  Trout Giggles    3 years ago
“I support codifying Roe. Unfortunately the bill … goes way beyond that. It would severely weaken the conscious exceptions that are in the current law,” Collins said, according to the Times.

What is she talking about? The story didn't elaborate...or she didn't

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
4.1  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    3 years ago

46 states have laws protecting doctors from lawsuits if their actions, based on religious beliefs, harm a patient.

The Democratic version of the Bill attempts to provide an level base which Collins believes weakens the protections for providers.

Most states did not have exceptions to the laws, even in cases of potentially fatal ectopic pregnancy, and most did not require the clinician to provide a referral or information regarding access to services. Twenty-six states imposed no conditions on the rights of refusal.

Some states did limit the immunity from lawsuits in cases of emergency (13 states), miscarriage (four states), and ectopic pregnancy (three states).

The study shows that the majority of states have given more weight to the providers’ rights than to the patients’ needs, said Dr. Albert Wu, an internist and professor of health policy and management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. It’s “disturbing that patients in 37 states do not have a right to those services and that patients have been injured as a result,” Wu said. “It’s a widely held belief that the patients should come first.”

“This crosses a line to the point where employee rights are encroaching on patients’ rights,” Wu said. “I think patients need more safeguards to make sure their right to health is not trumped by the preferences of medical professionals.”

Collins prefers the hodge podge of current laws ( States Rights ) and opposes any federal limitations.

In other words, she believes the providers rights are more important than patient rights and patient safety.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @4.1    3 years ago
even in cases of potentially fatal ectopic pregnancy,

An ectopic pregnancy is not even a real pregnancy. It will kill the woman if it left untreated. And the fetus can't be removed and transplanted into the uterus (yeah...there have been some mental midgets who think that's possible). So any doctor that won't treat an ectopic pregnancy, ie, abortion, based on his/her religious beliefs should be sued out of practice AND that doctor should lose his/her license to practice medicine

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Susan Collins is worthless. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6  devangelical    3 years ago

senator susan "penis envy" collins needs to retire.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @6    3 years ago

Can't stand that doddering old bitch.  I wonder how much she was paid for her 'opinion'?  Bitch needs to get gone

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @6.1    3 years ago

it's definitely "old shakey's" last term...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.1    3 years ago
Bitch needs to get gone

Elections have consequences, as Obama stated.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7  Kavika     3 years ago

Her decision isn't surprising at all.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.1  Tessylo  replied to  Kavika @7    3 years ago

She always goes against women.and sides with the pricks.  

Fuck her

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
8  JBB    3 years ago

Collins has lied to us enough. I am sick of her shit.

 
 

Who is online




589 visitors