╌>

Texas Parent Asks That Michelle Obama Biography Be Banned

  
Via:  Ender  •  2 years ago  •  16 comments

By:   Katie Balevic (Insider)

Texas Parent Asks That Michelle Obama Biography Be Banned
The parent said the biography should be pulled, in part, because it depicted Donald Trump as a bully. The school district will not pull the book.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



A parent in Texas called for a children's biography about former first lady Michelle Obama to be pulled from school libraries because they viewed it as unfair to former President Donald Trump.

The Katy, Texas, parent took issue with a book titled "Michelle Obama: Political Icon" by Heather E. Schwartz, saying it "unfairly" depicted Trump "as a bully," according to NBC News, which on Wednesday published a list of 50 books that parents in Texas have asked schools to remove.

The request came as books depicting race, sexuality, and gender have faced heightened scrutiny from conservatives in the US, with many demanding certain titles be pulled from school libraries.

The parent in Katy, who was not named in NBC's report, said the book about Obama gave the impression that "if you sound like a white girl you should be ashamed of yourself," NBC News reported.

In a statement to Insider, Schwartz said she was "shocked" that someone wanted to ban her book because it "is a nonfiction book that doesn't strike me as at all controversial."

Maria Corrales DiPetta, a spokesperson for the Katy Independent School District, told Insider the district reviewed the book after the complaint and determined it would not be removed. Any book that is challenged is reviewed by the district, even if only one parent submits a complaint, she said.

"We could have gotten hundreds of requests, and it would have gone through the same process," she added.

In December, the district began pulling books from the shelves after parents complained about their vulgarity, the Houston Chronicle reported.

"The Board of Trustees and I stand by this policy and firmly believe that there is no place for books that contain pervasively vulgar content in Katy ISD libraries," Superintendent Ken Gregorski said at the time.

"It is our expectation that books within our collections are age-appropriate for the students and families we serve," Gregorski added.

Similar efforts have gained traction from state legislators and other community leaders in the US. Last year, a state legislator in Oklahoma proposed a bill that would've prohibited books in school libraries that depicted sexual activity or included discussions around sexuality and gender identity, The New York Times reported.

In October, a Wyoming prosecutor declined a request to prosecute library employees in one conservative town for stocking several books about sex education and others with LGBTQ+ themes, The Associated Press reported.

"As an author, a reader, and a parent, I'm against book banning on principle," Schwartz, the author of the Obama biography, said. "There couldn't be a safer way for kids to learn about difficult topics, gain new perspectives, and explore the world and their place in it than by reading words on a page."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Ender    2 years ago

Prosecute library employees over books?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.1  Krishna  replied to  Ender @1    2 years ago
Prosecute library employees over books?

Off with their heads! 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Krishna @1.1    2 years ago

Hey now, I didn't see Alice In Wonderland the movie until I was a teenager...and stoned...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  Ender @1    2 years ago

didn't some thumper organize a book burning recently?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  devangelical @1.2    2 years ago

I wouldn't be surprised.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  devangelical @1.2    2 years ago

Greg Locke did.  Down with all that Harry Potter sorcery!!

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
2  Veronica    2 years ago

prohibited books in school libraries that depicted sexual activity

So they are removing the Bible?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Veronica @2    2 years ago

Death, destruction, incest...

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
2.1.1  Veronica  replied to  Ender @2.1    2 years ago

Prostitutes - adultery - bigamy 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Ender @2.1    2 years ago

sounds like a goober funeral in the deep south...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Veronica @2.1.1    2 years ago

... and that sounds like the trump presidency.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2.1.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Veronica @2.1.1    2 years ago

Most prolific mass murder in supposed human history.  God makes Satan look positively charming in this respect.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
2.1.5  Veronica  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.4    2 years ago

Crazy to worship that & let your children read that.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
2.1.6  Veronica  replied to  devangelical @2.1.3    2 years ago

Heehee.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3  Split Personality    2 years ago
The Supreme Court in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico (1982) ruled 5-4 that public schools can bar books that are “pervasively vulgar” or not right for the curriculum, but   they cannot remove books  “simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books.”

...

Justices said school boards could not remove books to suppress ideas

On the principle that “the Constitution protects the   right to receive information and ideas ,” he concluded that the removal of books from the shelves of a school library implicates students’ First Amendment rights in part because of “the special characteristics of the school   library. ” Justice Brennan then concluded that school officials may not exercise their discretion to remove books from a school library based on “narrowly partisan or political” grounds, because doing so would amount to an “official suppression of ideas.”

In a concurrence, Justice Blackmun rejected the notion that a school library was distinct from the school itself and also disagreed with the notion that students had a First Amendment “right to receive” in the context of a public school. He agreed, however, that school officials’ removal of books “for the   purpose  of restricting access to the political ideas, or social perspectives discussed in them, when that action is motivated simply by the officials’ disapproval of the ideas involved” was a violation of the First Amendment.

Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico | The First Amendment Encyclopedia (mtsu.edu)

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @3    2 years ago

But in fact, based on many years of personal experience, school boards are mostly concerned with the loudest parent.

Then again, at every school board meeting I attended, either one or more of the Members were lawyers or the Board had their

attorney present to shoot down the crazier ideas right off the bat.

In many instances the school board act like children and try to see what they can get away with

because most people aren't going to pay for a lawsuit out of their own pocket.

 
 

Who is online

squiggy


436 visitors