╌>

U.S. Supreme Court buoys religious employees who seek accommodations at work | Reuters

  
Via:  Ender  •  10 months ago  •  27 comments

By:   Andrew Chung (Reuters)

U.S. Supreme Court buoys religious employees who seek accommodations at work | Reuters
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday bolstered the ability of employees to obtain accommodations at work for their religious practices, reviving a lawsuit by an evangelical Christian former mail carrier accusing the Postal Service of discrimination after being disciplined for refusing to show up for work on Sundays.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


June 29 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday bolstered the ability of employees to obtain accommodations at work for their religious practices, reviving a lawsuit by an evangelical Christian former mail carrier accusing the Postal Service of discrimination after being disciplined for refusing to show up for work on Sundays.
The 9-0 ruling threw out a lower court's decision rejecting a claim by Gerald Groff, a former mail carrier in Pennsylvania, that the Postal Service's actions refusing to exempt him from working on Sundays, when he observes the Sabbath, violated federal anti-discrimination law.
The Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has a track record of expanding religious rights, often siding with Christian plaintiffs.
The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had found that Groff's absences placed too much of a hardship on his co-workers and employer. The Supreme Court ordered the 3rd Circuit to reconsider the matter.
Groff's case centered on a federal anti-discrimination law called Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on religion and other factors including race, sex and national origin.
Under Title VII, employers must make allowances for a worker's religious observance or practices unless that would cause the business "undue hardship" - which the Supreme Court in a 1977 case called Trans World Airlines

visit seeded article for remaining content

Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Ender    10 months ago

Do not agree with this decision. 

If some religious people can basically do whatever they want, I wait for the day they start their lawsuits against companies that start refusing to hire them.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ender @1    10 months ago

This guy was making it harder on everybody that he worked with. I understand that they tried to accommodate him, but it can't always be done. Sounds to me like he used his religion to get out of working on Sundays. Don't like working on Sundays? Get another job

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    10 months ago

Imo they tried to accommodate him yet it can't always be done. I think he was under the impression that since he got away with it for so long, he should be able to continue.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Ender @1    10 months ago

If some religious people can basically do whatever they want, I wait for the day they start their lawsuits against companies that start refusing to hire them.

The problem is that they will demand rights to follow only the religious rules that they want.

The same guy that demands Sundays off for religious reasons cheats on his wife, wears mixed blend fabrics, eats crab, lobster and pork, and shaves off his facial hair daily.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  Texan1211    10 months ago

this seems like the right decision.

Didn't a group of Muslims sue a few years ago for prayer time while at work?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @2    10 months ago

they can pray on their own time...I ain;t picking up the slack because they want to spend 30 minutes on their knees

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1    10 months ago

if I remember correctly, the court disagreed with you.

Has Biden slammed this decision, too?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    10 months ago

IDK and I don't care what he thinks.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.2    10 months ago

wow!

That makes two of us at least.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Trout Giggles  impassed  Texan1211 @2.1.3    10 months ago
 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @2    10 months ago

Pretty sure I said then what I will now, fuck that.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @2    10 months ago

Good, my religious beliefs dictate that I do not have to work Monday-Sunday but be required to be paid plus 20hrs overtime. For, you know, religious practices or whatever the fuck..

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Ender    10 months ago

So will people in retail now have to deal with employees that will not work on Sundays?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ender @3    10 months ago

Sounds like it. No more breakfast on Sunday morning at IHOP

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2  Texan1211  replied to  Ender @3    10 months ago

no.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     10 months ago

Before I retired we had 2 shifts sometimes 3 shifts a day and there was always work on both Saturday and Sunday. There was almost no way that we could accomodate Saturday or Sunday off for employees.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Kavika @4    10 months ago

From what I can see there really is no litmus test for who is religious or not. So people have to rely on the word of others.

I bet a lot of people find Jesus...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @4    10 months ago

I had a couple of installers pull this thumper bullshit on me decades ago, so I switched from first come first served and pick your own route to assigning routes that I had created. pretty soon there was nobody left claiming a religious exemption and we went back to first come first served and pick your own route.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
5  charger 383    10 months ago

I see some small independent religions forming to take advantage of this ruling

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7  Kavika     10 months ago

Being a member of the ''Church of What's Happening Now'' I am overjoyed that I can now get days off with pay. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
7.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Kavika @7    10 months ago

I am with the church of the Fonz.

Aye...

We get off on Sunday, Monday...Happy days...Tuesday, Wednesday...Happy Days...Thursday, Friday...Happy days...

And Saturday is a day for grooving.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
7.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Ender @7.1    10 months ago

It seems that, according to the SCOTUS, you get all those days.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
7.1.2  seeder  Ender  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.1.1    10 months ago

That deserves a double thumbs up. That is a high honour in our church.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
7.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Ender @7.1.2    10 months ago

EYYYYYYYYY.......

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.2  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @7    10 months ago

they have a weed church in the metro area here somewhere...

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
8  bbl-1    10 months ago

Well.  I certainly hope there are provisions for the 'utterly religious' that on their day of being 'utterly' they have the gawd given right to buy gasoline, go to Walmart or Lowes or whatever.  Got to end this 'utterly' religious persecution.

 
 

Who is online



96 visitors