╌>

Federal judge blocks Florida restrictive voting law

  
Via:  Kavika  •  last year  •  18 comments

By:   NBC News

Federal judge blocks Florida restrictive voting law
A federal judge barred Florida from enforcing the bulk of its new restrictive voting law on Thursday, siding with advocates who said the law was discriminatory.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


March 31, 2022, 5:48 PM UTCBy Jane C. Timm

A federal judge barred Florida from enforcing the bulk of its new restrictive voting law on Thursday, siding with opponents who said the law was discriminatory and needlessly infringed on Floridians' voting rights.

The ruling, which will likely be appealed, is the first major invalidation of a spate of restrictive new election laws passed in Republican-controlled states last year, fueled by voter fraud anxieties and President Donald Trump's stolen election lie.

The Florida law, known as Senate Bill 90, added new restrictions on drop boxes, third-party voter registration, mail voting, and "line warming" activities like giving voters food and water while they wait in line to cast a ballot. It was challenged last May in federal court by voting rights advocates led by the League of Women Voters of Florida.

March 3, 202201:30

In a stinging 288-page ruling, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Mark Walker declared the bulk of the state's new voting rules unconstitutional and issued a permanent injunction barring their enforcement.

The plaintiffs "allege that SB 90 runs roughshod over the right to vote, unnecessarily making voting harder for all eligible Floridians, unduly burdening disabled voters, and intentionally targeting minority voters — all to improve the electoral prospects of the party in power," Walker, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote. "Having reviewed all the evidence, this Court finds that, for the most part, Plaintiffs are right."

Walker writes in his ruling that certain provisions of the law intentionally discriminated against Black voters — though he notes the plaintiffs were not able to prove intentional discrimination against Latino voters — and says that the law fundamentally was designed with partisan aims.

"If the Legislature were merely reacting to the political mood, we would expect to see the Legislature carpet-bomb the election code," Walker wrote, citing testimony from Dr. Morgan Kousser, an expert witness in the case. "This Court finds that the Legislature enacted SB 90 to improve the Republican Party's electoral prospects, not to respond to the general political mood."

The judge also ordered Florida to submit to a process known as "preclearance," using Section 3(C) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a part of the law that allows courts to force jurisdictions to get pre-approval on election law changes.

Under the order, Florida must clear voting law or regulation changes with Walker's court for the next ten years, when those changes involve third-party voter registration organizations, drop boxes, or line-warming activities.

The ruling is in many ways a hearty defense of the Voting Rights Act and a call for federal courts to firmly enforce it. Repeatedly quoting Martin Luther King, Jr., Walker's decision defends judicial branch power to police discrimination in elections, while acknowledging that other, higher courts — including the U.S. Supreme Court — have declined to do so.

"This is an opinion that full throatedly reads the Voting Rights Act in the expansive way that Congress intended it to be read, and essentially dares the higher courts to overrule it," said Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California, Irvine.

He noted the application of preclearance was particularly surprising, because the parties of the suit had spent little time arguing the issue and included less than six pages of briefs between both parties.

Jane C. Timm

Jane C. Timm is a senior reporter for NBC News.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Kavika     last year
In a stinging 288-page ruling, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Mark Walker declared the bulk of the state's new voting rules unconstitutional and issued a permanent injunction barring their enforcement. The plaintiffs "allege that SB 90 runs roughshod over the right to vote, unnecessarily making voting harder for all eligible Floridians, unduly burdening disabled voters, and intentionally targeting minority voters — all to improve the electoral prospects of the party in power,"

DeSantis is on a hell of a losing streak.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1  bugsy  replied to  Kavika @1    last year

The good news is if he drops out of the presidential race, he will still be your governor.

Cheers to that!!!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  bugsy @1.1    last year

He will be for another three years and then he will fall into the dust bin of history.

Cheers to that as well.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Kavika @1.1.1    last year
He will be for another three years and then he will fall into the dust bin of history.

No, the right guess is he will run again in 2028 no matter if Biden or Trump wins 2024, and will handily win 2 terms.

That will really tick off liberals.

Good!!!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Kavika @1.1.1    last year
He will be for another three years and then he will fall into the dust bin of history.

No, the right guess is he will run again in 2028 no matter if Biden or Trump wins 2024, and will handily win 2 terms.

That will really tick off liberals.

Good!!!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.1.4  seeder  Kavika   replied to  bugsy @1.1.2    last year
No, the right guess is he will run again in 2028 no matter if Biden or Trump wins 2024, and will handily win 2 terms.

He will have been out of office (governor) for two years by then he will be pretty much be forgotten since he couldn't win in 2024.

That will really tick off liberals. Good!!!

I doubt it but you certainly are free to imagine what a loser like DeSantis will do. 

Cheers.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.2  Hallux  replied to  Kavika @1    last year

He's on a race to the bottom, one he can win.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Hallux @1.2    last year
He's on a race to the bottom, one he can win.

He is leading the pack, and that is not a good thing.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @1    last year

the law was discriminatory and needlessly infringed on Floridians' voting rights

gee, what kind of unamerican scum would write or sign a law like that into existence?    /s

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  devangelical @1.3    last year
the law was discriminatory and needlessly infringed on Floridians' voting rights gee, what kind of unamerican scum would write or sign a law like that into existence?

Mr. ''These Boots Are Made For Walking'' is stumbling into oblivion.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2  Ender    last year

Sounds like they didn't even try defending it.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Ender @2    last year
Sounds like they didn't even try defending it.

DeSantis top notch legal team is to busy writing appeals.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
3  bbl-1    last year

Truly a shame that the Second Amendment can be used only by those who desire to take away freedoms instead of the other way around.

As far as DeSantis----he'll never have Ivanka.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  bbl-1 @3    last year
As far as DeSantis----he'll never have Ivanka.

LOL, probably not.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2  Hallux  replied to  bbl-1 @3    last year
he'll never have Ivanka.

... and she'll never have him, Casey is the puppet master.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
4  Gsquared    last year

Excellent ruling.  Very encouraging.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    last year

You guys still fall for this?  

The Dems forum shop for this judge, who assigns every DeSantis case to himself.  He then  writes a hysterical opinion that generates lots of media coverage.  He gets reversed on appeal with the appellate court trashing his dishonesty. 

Rinse, Repeat.

Heres' what they wrote the last time they reversed him a few months ago.

“The district court relied on fatally flawed statistical analyses, out-of-context statements by individual legislators, and legal premises that do not follow our precedents,” . “On the contrary, examining the record reveals that the finding of intentional discrimination rests on hardly any evidence.”

This happens every few months. I'd hope you'd catch on by now. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

Well, then you should be quite pleased. You do realize that there are a number of other cases pending that have not been overturned, right?

And it seems that you keep falling for DeSantis as he races to the bottom of the heap. Your kind of guy a loser.

BTW, pointing fingers on judge shopping is living in a glass house, the right is famous for doing just that.

 
 

Who is online

Sparty On


531 visitors