╌>

Bellwether? Ohio voters back abortion rights amendment in a test case for other states

  
Via:  Trout Giggles  •  last year  •  20 comments

By:   Susan Page, USA Today

Bellwether? Ohio voters back abortion rights amendment in a test case for other states
 

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Sweeping support for a proposed Ohio constitutional amendment enshrining abortion rights spotlights the potential power of the issue to drive voter turnout and affect races up and down the ballot, even in Republican-leaning states.

A new USA TODAY Network/Suffolk University survey of Ohio showed the amendment guaranteeing access to reproductive services backed by a double-digit margin, 58%-32%. Significant support crossed partisan lines, including a third of Republicans and a stunning 85% of independent women, a key group of persuadable voters.

The poll of 500 likely voters in Ohio, conducted by landline and cellphone from July 9 to 12, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points for the full sample.

The battle in Ohio, the only state likely to have an abortion measure on the ballot in November's off-year election, is being watched by activists nationwide who are considering a push for state-based initiatives in the next election cycle to codify or restore abortion rights. That could include swing states such as Arizona and reliably red ones like Florida, Missouri and South Dakota.

Ohio stands as a test case.

The first hurdle: How many votes needed to pass it?


"For sure, I think folks are really paying attention," said Heather Shumaker, director of state abortion access for the National Women's Law Center, which supports the amendment. That's especially true in states where Republican-controlled state governments have imposed strict limits on abortion s in the year since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. "We know that ballot measures have emerged as one of the most promising strategies to preserve abortion access."

Opponents of abortion are also watching Ohio for lessons on how to combat the initiatives. "I certainly anticipate other states to be looking at us and the model we used," said Amy Natoce of Protect Women Ohio, a coalition opposing the proposal. They describe the measure as "anti-parent," arguing it undermines the authority of parents to make decisions about abortion and gender assignment issues for their minor children.

A special election on Aug. 8 could change the prospects for passage.

Now, ballot measures in Ohio need a simple majority, 50% plus one, to amend the state constitution. Under the proposal being voted on next month, the bar would be raised to 60%. Support in the new survey for the abortion-rights measure, at 58%, would fall just short of that level.

In the poll, Ohioans opposed raising the threshold by more than 2-1, 57%-26%.

Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose faces a deadline Tuesday to announce if proponents gathered enough valid signatures to put the abortion rights measure on the November ballot as well as a proposal to legalize the recreational use of marijuana by adults.

Who supports the abortion amendment in Ohio?


The proposed amendment to the Ohio constitution states that "every individual has a right to make and carry out one's own reproductive decisions, including but not limited to decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing one's own pregnancy, miscarriage care, and abortion." Abortion could be banned after viability when a fetus could survive outside the womb.

After being read the ballot measure's language, women surveyed supported the measure by more than 2-1, 64%-28%. Men backed it by 50%-37%.

White respondents backed it by 57%-34% and minority respondents by 66%-24%.

A majority of those at all levels of education expressed support, from those with no more than a high school diploma (52%-39%) to those with post-graduate degrees (65%-26%).

Support also spanned all age groups. It was strongest among young voters; those 18 to 34 years old backed it by close to 3-1, 69%-25%. Seniors 65 and older comprised the age group who supported it by the smallest margin, 48%-40%.

The breadth of backing across demographic divisions is notable. So are the views across party lines. The measure was endorsed not only by the overwhelming majority of Democrats, 81%-14%, but also among independents by 3-1, 68%-22%. Support among independent women was 85%-12%, a bit higher than even among Democratic women, 81%-14%.

Women who aren't firmly aligned with either party have emerged as one of the most decisive groups of voters in recent elections, including in the GOP's disappointing performance in last year's midterm elections. Abortion access was one of the main issues Democratic candidates hammered.

"The general public in Ohio still likes their local Republican lawmakers, but when it comes to extreme positions against abortion rights, they are reeling them in," said David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center. "Even Republican voters have daughters, nieces, and granddaughters who may be facing decisions right now on abortion, contraception, or fertility treatment. So for some of these voters, it's not politics, it's personal."

In the USA TODAY survey, 32% of Republicans supported the amendment, 57% opposed it. There was no meaningful statistical difference between Republican women (31%-58%) and Republican men (33%-56%).

Ballot measures can generate turnout, affecting the outcome of other elections. The proposals in Ohio on both abortion rights and marijuana legalization could encourage younger and more liberal voters to go to the polls.

In 2004, strategists for President George W. Bush encouraged Ohio Republicans to put a proposal banning same-sex marriage on the ballot, a tactic they calculated would energize conservative evangelicals to vote. It passed easily, and Bush's victory in Ohio − so close it wasn't clear until the morning after the election − was decisive in his defeat of Democrat John Kerry.

For Republican presidential contenders, a potential conundrum


More than a third of voters who backed former President Donald Trump over President Joe Biden in a hypothetical 2024 matchup (34%) and those who backed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (36%) also supported the abortion amendment, the USA TODAY/Suffolk poll found.

DeSantis now claims the lion's share of Republican primary voters who support the amendment − 32% of them, compared with 15% who support Trump and 21% who are undecided. That's the case even though DeSantis in April signed a ban on abortions in Florida after six weeks of pregnancy; the law is now blocked as a court challenge continues.

DeSantis' strength among voters who back the amendment seems to indicate either that they aren't aware of his action on abortion or that the issue is not enough to sway their support for him.

In Ohio, Republican Gov. Mike DeWine in 2019 signed a "Heartbeat Bill" that effectively criminalizes abortion at six weeks, when cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo. The Ohio Supreme Court is now considering whether to allow the law to go into effect.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Ohioans back abortion rights amendment, a test case for other states

 


"


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Trout Giggles    last year
he breadth of backing across demographic divisions is notable. So are the views across party lines. The measure was endorsed not only by the overwhelming majority of Democrats, 81%-14%, but also among independents by 3-1, 68%-22%. Support among independent women was 85%-12%, a bit higher than even among Democratic women, 81%-14%.
 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1    last year

the christo-fascists in the legislature are still going to try and move the goalposts in august. I'm looking forward to watching the GOP getting their asses kicked over this issue, again, in 2024. even more so when the finger pointing and blame game starts afterwards and it lands squarely on the f'n thumpers...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     last year

Hopefully, the amendment will pass in Ohio and send another message to the RWNJ.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @2    last year

Ohio is a good place to start. It's gone red at least the last 2 POTUS elections I can remember

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1    last year

ohio, the state of the most rwnj elected pedophiles to congress to date...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Kavika @2    last year

And what would that message be?  That the recent decision of Roe v Wade put forth by the SCOTUS is working as intended?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.1  Snuffy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    last year

The message I take from it is that our federal leaders are not listening or following the desires of the majority of their constituents in this matter.  While the recent SCOTUS decision was correct as it should never have been decided at the court level, the leadership and members of both the House and the Senate are simply following their party dictates rather than the will of their constituents. 

This Congress should really come up with a compromise bill that both sides can live with that would legalize abortion at the federal level and put an end to this bullshit we currently have.  States rights is a wonderful thing but I really dislike this return to the 60's with the patchwork of laws around this topic.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.1    last year
While the recent SCOTUS decision was correct as it should never have been decided at the court level, the leadership and members of both the House and the Senate are simply following their party dictates rather than the will of their constituents. 

I see this as the SCOTUS telling them that this is NOT a federal issue.  Look at how screwed up the ACA is.  It's also telling the politicians to abide by what their constituents desire instead of what the morons in the parties want.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.2.3  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    last year

The message is quite clear, ''stay the hell out of a personal medical decision.''

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Kavika @2.2.3    last year

Yes!  Women are taking their rights BACK!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.5  devangelical  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.1    last year
come up with a compromise bill that both sides can live with that would legalize abortion at the federal level and put an end to this bullshit we currently have

we had one for 50 years, but the f'n thumpers decided that life begins when the male rolls off. there is no compromising with the religious wacko crowd. they only understand one permanent solution.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.6  Gordy327  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.1    last year

Elective abortion up to viability was the compromise. But that wasnt good enough for anti-choicers. They're not interested in compromise. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.7  devangelical  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.6    last year
that wasnt good enough for anti-choicers. They're not interested in compromise.

unfortunately for them, that's a 2 way street. any political influence by the religious right in the near future is about to get very expensive. thumpers will be digging even deeper on sunday morning.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.8  Snuffy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.2    last year

Don't really agree that it's not a federal issue, but it's definitely NOT a court issue.  This should be set at the federal level by Congress or as we have it now set at the state level.  I have a problem with the state level however as I do not like the patchwork return of the 60's.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.9  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.2.5    last year
life begins when the male rolls off.

then every time a man masturbates he's guilty of abortion

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3  Hallux    last year

So SCOTUS passes the 'pill' to the States to decide and Ohio passes the 'pill' for 40% to decide what 60% can or cannot get. Republicans are turning minority rule into a Gileadian art form. 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
4  bbl-1    last year

Unfortunately, Ohio is a red state.  It is also rife with corruption.  I am an Ohioan and will vote NO on Issue One.

As far as 'The Amendment', I'll believe it when I see it on the ballot.  And even if it passes the GOP legislature usually ignores the will of the citizens anyway.  They have their own set of rules.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  bbl-1 @4    last year
Ohio is a red state.

At the moment, historically, Ohio has been a swing state.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1    last year

Ohio's legislatures and Supreme Courts have been dominated by the GOP for decades.  Ohio's legislative districts, state and federal are carefully manicured.  Hence Jim Jordan.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
5  Drinker of the Wry    last year

[]

 
 

Who is online







JBB
Jack_TX


323 visitors