╌>

John Kelly confirms Trump's ugly comments on wounded veterans - The Washington Post

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  8 months ago  •  23 comments

By:   Aaron Blake Staff (Washington Post)

John Kelly confirms Trump's ugly comments on wounded veterans - The Washington Post
Kelly finally went on the record to make clear that, yes, Trump did say those things about veterans and wounded soldiers.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show

"A person who admires autocrats and murderous dictators. A person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.""There is nothing more that can be said," Kelly concluded. "God help us."


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Among the many controversies Donald Trump has courted during his time in politics, perhaps none engender the kinds of emotions as his comments — and reported comments — denigrating veterans and the war-wounded. But some of the most serious reports about what he's said have gone largely unconfirmed by key players.

That changed in a major way on Monday.

Former Trump White House chief of staff John F. Kelly delivered a blistering statement to CNN's Jake Tapper that, for the first time, served to confirm years-old comments attributed to Trump and for which Kelly was present.

Kelly, like many former top Trump administration officials, has criticized Trump somewhat in the past, but his new statement takes things to another level and fills out the picture of some of Trump's ugliest alleged comments.

Let's take Kelly's statement from CNN, piece by piece.

"What can I add that has not already been said?" Kelly said, calling Trump a "person that thinks those who defend their country in uniform, or are shot down or seriously wounded in combat, or spend years being tortured as POWs are all 'suckers' because 'there is nothing in it for them.'"

Kelly's reference to "being tortured as POWs" is an obvious reference to the late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), whose war-hero status Trump publicly cast doubt upon during the 2016 campaign, saying: "I like people that weren't captured."

But "suckers" and "there is nothing in it for them" — in quotation marks — refer to Jeffrey Goldberg's 2020 Atlantic piece. It quoted Trump using the former word to refer to the 1,800 Marines who died at Belleau Wood in France during World War I. It also quoted him saying something similar to the latter while standing next to the grave of Kelly's own son, who was killed in Afghanistan.

Kelly was described in the story as being present for each remark, but he declined to comment at the time. A close Kelly ally and former top White House aide later said that he — the ally, not Kelly — hadn't personally heard Trump use the word "suckers" and suggested the reporting had "conflated" certain events. But here is Kelly himself confirming Trump said these things.

Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung responded Monday night: "John Kelly has totally clowned himself with these debunked stories he's made up because he didn't serve his president well while working as chief of staff."

"A person that did not want to be seen in the presence of military amputees because 'it doesn't look good for me.' A person who demonstrated open contempt for a Gold Star family — for all Gold Star families — on TV during the 2016 campaign, and rants that our most precious heroes who gave their lives in America's defense are 'losers' and wouldn't visit their graves in France."

The first part refers to a 2022 book from Susan B. Glasser and Peter Baker which quoted Trump saying — again, in the presence of Kelly — that he didn't want "any wounded guys" in his big Independence Day parade.

The second refers to Trump's public comments during the 2016 Democratic National Convention, attacking a Gold Star family that had been critical of him.

(Kelly, notably, later defended Trump after a Democratic congresswoman cited insensitive comments allegedly made to a Gold Star family during a private phone call. But Kelly also seemed to confirm the nature of Trump's comments on the call.)

The part about "losers" and not wanting to visit gravesites is again confirming of the 2020 Atlantic piece, in which Trump allegedly said: "Why should I go to that cemetery? It's filled with losers."

The White House at the time flatly denied this. Trump himself added: "To think that I would make statements negative to our military and fallen heroes when nobody has done what I've done" for the military was "a total lie. … It's a disgrace."

A man who was present for these key events now effectively says that it not only happened, but that it happened over and over again.

(Another recent story from Goldberg described Trump telling the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, in 2019, that "no one wants to see that, the wounded" after a severely injured Army captain sang "God Bless America" at an event. Trump allegedly told Milley not to have the man appear in public again. Trump has denied the remarks.)

"A person who is not truthful regarding his position on the protection of unborn life, on women, on minorities, on evangelical Christians, on Jews, on working men and women."

This is where the statement starts going beyond veterans and mere confirmation of things already reported. Kelly suggests Trump doesn't just denigrate veterans, but also holds very different views than he portrays publicly about these issues and groups — and perhaps denigrates them, too.

It's the kind of comment that seems to invite further elaboration.

"A person that has no idea what America stands for and has no idea what America is all about. A person who cavalierly suggests that a selfless warrior who has served his country for 40 years in peacetime and war should lose his life for treason — in expectation that someone will take action."

Again, the subtext here is striking. This refers to Trump's recent comments accusing Milley of treason. Trump added that Milley's actions were "so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!"

Kelly's comment that Trump was saying this "in expectation that someone will take action" sure sounds like he is accusing Trump of attempting to incite violence against now-retired Milley.

"A person who admires autocrats and murderous dictators. A person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.""There is nothing more that can be said," Kelly concluded. "God help us."

Kelly has criticized Trump before, but his starkest comments have often been reported secondhand. You can now add him to the list of former top aides warning in some very strong terms about another Trump term — and effectively labeling Trump a clear and present danger.

 


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", or any variation thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Gsquared    8 months ago
Kelly suggests Trump doesn't just denigrate veterans, but also holds very different views than he portrays publicly about these issues and groups

Trump is a fraud, a liar and a low-life scumbag.  How could any patriotic, military/country serving person possibly even consider voting for him?  He hates you.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    8 months ago

I knew that he'd said it when I first heard that he'd said it..

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @1.1    8 months ago

Of course.  I had no doubt.  It was obvious after hearing what he said about McCain.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2  TᵢG    8 months ago

Trump supporters will simply say that Kelly is lying.    Fake news.

The only way to deal with supporting Trump as this stage is to misrepresent reality.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @2    8 months ago

Trump defenders don't deserve much respect.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    8 months ago

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @3    8 months ago

Why in god's name did John Kelly wait so long to speak out? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    8 months ago

Want to bet what NT vets, who are GOP loyalists, will say in response to this?    How will they justify voting for someone who has never served and who holds those who did serve (especially those who lost their lives or were subjected to years of torture) in such contempt?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.1    8 months ago

I'm sure they will think of something. 

I wonder what the guy who is so sure Trump wanted peacefulness at Jan 6th will say. 

They are so invested now in the idea that only Trump can properly chastise "the left" , they have lost the ability to be objective about Trump. And of course no one likes to admit they've been wrong all along. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.3  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.1    8 months ago

none of that will matter to them at this point...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.1    8 months ago

The incidents Kelly is confirming all took place prior to the 2020 election, when Trump could have been returned to office, yet Kelly said nothing. I dont doubt what he says is true, but his keeping these things "secret" doesnt make him look good either. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    8 months ago

Any other candidate that I can recall, who said anything like what Trump allegedly said, would be summarily dismissed by the electorate.

WTF is the magical appeal of Trump?   

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.6  TᵢG  replied to  devangelical @3.1.3    8 months ago

Amazing, right?  One of the most cherished aspects of having served is the fraternity with all other vets.   Yet there are proud veterans who are going to willingly vote for this asshole.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.4    8 months ago

I suspect the key problem is that Kelly cannot prove this.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.8  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.5    8 months ago

This is not an original idea of mine, it has been said in some quarters all along, MAGA is all about grievance, mostly grievance by middle aged or older white people who feel the last couple decades have seen "their" country change for the worse. America's future will be diverse and multicultural and there are millions and millions of people who object to that. As the king birther from 2011, Trump had built in cred with the group of grievances. They also like the way he insults the "lamestream media" and the "libs". 

You have seen some of those Trump rally interviews of attendees. That is his base. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.7    8 months ago

If its his word against Donald Trump's I know who I'm going to believe. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1.10  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.5    8 months ago
WTF is the magical appeal of Trump?

After watching how everything has developed over the last several years, it seems as though Trump's lies, cruelty, selfishness, greed and generally disgusting behavior is exactly what they like about him.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.11  TᵢG  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.10    8 months ago

But no other candidate in history could get away with his behavior.   Why is Trump seemingly immune?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1.12  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.11    8 months ago

That's a question scholars may be pondering for decades to come.

Mass psychosis?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.13  TᵢG  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.12    8 months ago

The mystery of demagoguery.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     8 months ago

As a combat vet, from a family that has served for decades, I'd like to thank General Kelly and Milley for their service and support of our constitution. 

Fuck Trump.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Kavika @4    8 months ago

And major thanks to you, too. Kavika.  We are eternally grateful.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @4    8 months ago

too bad all vets don't think as clearly as you. in my eyes, vets that support trump now have completely negated anything positive in their service to this country.

 
 

Who is online




43 visitors