╌>

MTG, Nancy Mace Want to Force Trans Congresswoman to Use Mens Room

  
Via:  Devangelical  •  14 hours ago  •  37 comments

By:   Charisma Madarang (Rolling Stone)

MTG, Nancy Mace Want to Force Trans Congresswoman to Use Mens Room
Rep. Nancy Mace introduced a bill that would ban transgender Congress members from using Capitol Hill facilities that match their gender identity

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show

the new "we refuse to fellate anyone wearing a dress" maga caucus emerges ...


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The bill would ban Rep.-elect Sarah McBride and other House employees from accessing single-sex facilities that correspond to their gender identity.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced a bill on Monday that would prohibit transgender members of Congress and other government employees from using Capitol Hill facilities that match their gender identity.

The resolution arrives just over a week after Rep.-elect Sarah McBride (D-Del.) became the first openly transgender person to be elected to the U.S. House of Representatives.

When speaking to reporters, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Mace doubled down on the House resolution. "He's a man, a biological male," said Greene, referring to McBride. "So he is not allowed to use our women's restrooms, our women's gym, our locker rooms and our spaces that are that are specified for women."

"Men need to, they need to respect our spaces, and that's what this election was all about," continued Greene. "The new member of Congress that was voted in the Congress on behalf of his district in Delaware needs to respect my space, my privacy, and other women's space and privacy, because he is not a woman."

Mace accused the "radical left" of wanting "to erase women and women's rights." The South Carolina congresswoman said she would be "standing in his or her way, putting a stop to this insanity and this nonsense." Mace added, "She doesn't get a say. This is about real women and women's rights."

While Greene framed her stance as in support of women's rights, the congresswoman has backed the Life at Conception Act — effectively a total ban on abortion that would put millions of women and girls at risk. Mace has stated the the issue of abortion should be decided by the states, not the federal government.

"This is a blatant attempt from far right-wing extremists to distract from the fact that they have no real solutions to what Americans are facing," McBride said in a statement. "We should be focused on bringing down the cost of housing, health care and child care, not manufacturing culture wars."

Slamming the measure, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said, "This is not just bigotry, this is just plain bullying."

According to Axios, Republican leadership appeared to consider the resolution. "We're going to talk about that," said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). "We're working on the issue."


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1  seeder  devangelical    14 hours ago

curiously, no elected maga males have joined the new caucus ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @1    8 hours ago

they both have matt gaetz charm bracelets ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2  Trout Giggles    14 hours ago
respect my space, my privacy, and other women's space and privacy,

Oh, yeah? How about respecting everybody else's space and privacy? Selfish bunch of hypocrites

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2    13 hours ago

it's a first strike towards their perceived competition for the affections of the thumper maga in the house ...

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3  Sparty On    13 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @3    13 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4  CB    13 hours ago

And so we see clearly that some women, mother's even. . . can be graceless, mocking, mean-spirited, and spiteful towards other people.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1  Sparty On  replied to  CB @4    13 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5  CB    13 hours ago

Why, God, is there always somebody standing in the way of just living a good life for themselves and others. Why must it be this way (all the time)?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.1  Sparty On  replied to  CB @5    13 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @5.1    13 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2  seeder  devangelical  replied to  CB @5    13 hours ago

maga doesn't believe in any of that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness bullshit, unless it involves sexual assault ...

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @5.2    13 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @5.2.1    12 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
6  Hal A. Lujah    12 hours ago

Republicans literally want the manliest bearded trans men in the public bathrooms with their little girls.  If you think being trans is a mental illness, then what would you call a mentality that seeks to place bearded humans with deep voices and muscular physique in a bathroom with young girls?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1  Sparty On  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    12 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
6.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    11 hours ago

I didn’t catch whatever shitty thing you had to say before it was removed, but I imagine you probably think that trans people should not be allowed to urinate or defecate period.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.1    11 hours ago

I think something else. But I can't say it.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.3  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.1    11 hours ago

if BMTG and Mace in your face are anti gay, they should just cheer up

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.4  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.2    9 hours ago
But I can't say it.

I will. he asked, he told ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.5  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.1    9 hours ago
I didn’t catch whatever shitty thing you had to say before it was removed

nothing noteworthy. continued trolling ...

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
6.1.6  1stwarrior  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.1    6 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
6.1.7  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  1stwarrior @6.1.6    6 hours ago

I wish I could say I understand the trans mindset, but I don’t get it at all.  However, it’s not mine to get.  It obviously means an enormous amount to an enormous number of people, so I’m fine with whatever it takes to make them as happy as the rest of us get to be.  

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.8  CB  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.1.7    3 hours ago

I understand the mindset. Of course, I do. I go back and forth on the 'possibilities.' As a young person, I used to. . . wish it. . . just to be happy (of sorts). The thought goe at the least I could find someone who might/could want me as a "she' who could not want me as a "he." It was always there to be considered, smiled at, maybe 'acted' on in the quiet of my own mind. . .and apartments or home. Alas! It was too far for me to go. I will tell you this about trans-people who have not carried through to surgery. . . their 'junk' yet works down below and so their drives 'persist' (whether acted on or not in some way). Yes, hormones should alter the primal relationship of the drives. . .admittedly, since I never took hormones I don't know how estrogen alters drive. But I once had a friend trans-person who explained to me how she had 'encounters' with males/men who expressed interests in her male 'junk' below. . . . (Don't get the visual. I almost gagged when told myself. As it had never crossed my mind. . . . People can surprise. . . .)

I am going to leave off on this one here. . .because I don't know how deep into the account to go (but I could). However, it may help somebody to understand that 'spiritual' love is more than just about going to "heavens" or "hells". When we love someone, really love somebody, spirit love is involved and is permanent. Physical love is just 'effing" together and is temporary. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.2  CB  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    4 hours ago

Imitation is a form of flattery, it has been said. That a boy or man wishes to endure the physical pain and emotional damages of presenting himself/a version of herself to the public which scorns him/her points out it is not a small 'feat.' And, in a male-dominated society. .. wanting to be dominated by men when you are one willing to opt out. . . speaks to the sincerity and 'force' of the issue. (And yet, we have these insincere people trying to make light of it with insults, mockings, and physical violence.)

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    11 hours ago

Whew! We can finally end all those assaults happening in the ladies' room at the Capitol! /s

I like how a trans person in the bathroom is a fucking crisis, but all the whoremongers and sexual assaulters in Congress and the White House is A-OK!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @7    9 hours ago

the capitol men's room urinals probably have stalls, considering the number of dickless wonders in the house majority ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @7.1    8 hours ago

We wouldn't want petty jealousies in the House, would we?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1.2  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @7.1.1    8 hours ago

more like uncontrollable laughter ...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.2  evilone  replied to  Tacos! @7    7 hours ago
...all the whoremongers and sexual assaulters in Congress and the White House is A-OK!

As is a ecstasy partying pedofile AG nonimation or a Sec of Ed that couldn't keep her own husband away from sexually abusing his female employees.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
7.2.1  CB  replied to  evilone @7.2    3 hours ago

Oh, the 'vanities' of the rich and powerful. Donald has the best lawyers, it does seem. . . and he gets them to think outside of the box for the amount he pays them!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
7.3  CB  replied to  Tacos! @7    4 hours ago

Selective outrage is disgusting and outdated. It's a perversion all its own.

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
9  freepress    8 hours ago

What a victory.

Will Mace or any other Republican fight this hard to help their voters when Trump takes away healthcare, hands tax cuts to billionaires, cuts Medicare and Social Security, crashes the safety net resulting in millions more homeless people? 

Will any Republican fight this hard for actual kitchen table issues that Americans really want to address?

No, they won't. Because they are more interested in culture wars that are so miniscule it just becomes a rage farm for right wing voters that fall for the outrage peddled by Republicans and right wing media profiting from it.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
9.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  freepress @9    6 hours ago

Because they are more interested in culture wars that are so miniscule

Indeed.  Men don’t go into a public restroom and expose their junk to anything but a urinal.  Ever.  What is there to be afraid of?  What is any trans man going to see, and better yet who the fuck cares?  What kind of fragile snowflake is concerned about this?!  Will they ever be able to recover from someone born with a vagina seeing them fully clothed from behind while they are standing at a urinal?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
9.1.1  CB  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @9.1    3 hours ago

And it flies in the face of logic. That is, a woman does not NEED to change her existing sexual self to ATTRACT a straight male. If a trans-male is 'fronting' in order to catch a man in her clutches-it is certainly going to be a woman seeking a homosexual male by virtue of his attraction (and maybe confusion) about what she appears to be 'up and down' on her person. 

There are no mythical trans-people (at least I hope not-but, there are always an exception to every rule no doubt) that feel compelled to hang around changing rooms, bathhouses, or 'outhouses' looking for relief. It is not why people go the 'distance' to become who they are inside. Of course, right-wing personages can demonize heterosexuals into responding in any variety of negative ways (including violence) by their words, positions, writings, and actions.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
10  1stwarrior    6 hours ago

[]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
10.1  CB  replied to  1stwarrior @10    3 hours ago

Because there is no evidence of the presence of spirit-living that can be found in human bones of any 'flesh' creatures. And, I should know how this works, because I have spent all my life loving and longing (off and on) for a male companion. Now, I am admittedly old. Some conservatives, y'all ruin lives. . . and lifetimes. Y'all do not understand what you do in your haste and unrelenting arrogance to innocent people 'trapped' in this life with people who hate 'us' to the core.

 
 

Who is online




133 visitors