"I'm gonna just sit back and sip my tea": Democrats won't save Johnson's speakership | Salon.com
By: Griffin Eckstein
there never was a more deserving victim of maga treachery ...
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries signaled that Democrats would not step in to save Speaker Mike Johnson from a potential ouster attempt, paving the way for a tumultuous fight for the gavel.
Asked on Thursday if his caucus would consider voting for Johnson's upcoming speakership bid if he worked to prevent an impending government shutdown, Jeffries answered "no."
Come January, the GOP will hold one of the slimmest House majorities of all time. Johnson's party won the chamber by a 5-seat margin. Three of those Republican seats will be empty at the beginning of the next House session, as Reps. Elise Stefanik and Mike Waltz have resigned to serve in President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet. Rep. Matt Gaetz resigned on the belief that he would serve in Trump's Cabinet and has shared that he has no plans to return after his nomination fell to pieces.
Johnson's willingness to reach across the aisle to avoid a government shutdown has angered many hardliners in his party. Members of the MAGA-affiliated House Freedom Caucus have warned Johnson they wouldn't support the deal on the table and threatened consequences for any deal made with Democrats. Rep Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said on Wednesday that he planned to oppose Johnson if he solved the shutdown.
"I think it's shameful that Mike Johnson would do this after we received a mandate in the election," he shared with a local outlet. "I know it's a lame-duck session, but still, there's no reason for us to capitulate when on Jan. 20, Trump's going to be President, and on Jan. 3, we have the majority in the Senate."
If Johnson can't whip together support for his speakership, his time at the helm will have been remarkably short. A similar revolt from the right flank of the House GOP ousted former Speaker Kevin McCarthy earlier this year in the first successful motion to vacate the speakership in American history.
Johnson's only hope might be the Democrats, and Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, argued that they should watch him squirm a little.
"When they swear in in January… there's gonna be fewer Republicans than we had in the 118th [Congress]," Crockett said in an appearance on MSNBC on Wednesday night. "There is no fixing this without the Democrats. We've seen this over and over. I'm gonna just sit back and sip my tea and wait on them to figure it out."
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted. Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted. Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Tags
Who is online
45 visitors
LOL, just stand right there and wait for the next bus, thumper ...
I’m in charge, no I am, hold on neither of you are, it’s me…
Republican version of ‘’who’s on first’’.
I really like watching thumpers get humiliated, ever since childhood ...
I'm secretly hoping that the maga morons pants him right after they take the speaker's chair from him ...
How many versions is this of the Republican Clown Show?
... and maga morons wonder why it's so easy for their opponents to predict what they will do next.
looks like the 4 year long stretch of maga national embarrassments is starting a month early ...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, argued that they should watch him squirm a little.
"When they swear in in January… there's gonna be fewer Republicans than we had in the 118th [Congress]," Crockett said in an appearance on MSNBC on Wednesday night. "There is no fixing this without the Democrats. We've seen this over and over. I'm gonna just sit back and sip my tea and wait on them to figure it out."
You know when the Harris campaign was spiraling down the toliet, this is exactly the approach the Democrats took in supporting her.
I like consistency.
... yeah, that's your legacy here ...
.. yeah, that's your legacy here ...
I am sure that sounded pithy and clever in your head, but it makes little sense
The point I made was that I like consistency in the action of others in this case the Democrats - who didn't want to help Harris and don't want to help Johnson
you're still free to take whatever meaning you want from my statement ...
mike johnson is the leading religious hypocrite in america, and his word now means nothing in congress ...
You still miss the point, perhaps intentionally. The democrats decided to help Harris (she lost) and vow not to help Johnson (he likely will also lose) thus I like their consistency.
That's probably the least logical post I have seen in quite a while. Democrats need to stonewall as much of the republicans garbage as they can.
I agree. rule by minority and turn the lame ass POS about to move into the white house a lame duck from day 1 ...
You know the GOP would
A fine example of the counterproductive, uber-partisan jerks taking up space in Congress.
it's long been apparent that republicans can no longer govern. to them, compromising to legislate is viewed as a weakness that requires banishment from leadership roles and sometimes the party itself. fortunately, recent events make it seem that several republicans in congress may have discovered how to temporarily silence their cult leader. I read an article claiming that trump had lost nearly 10 points in his approval rating within the party since the election. it's a political pattern trump has converted from his method of doing business. over sell, over finance, over promise, under deliver, and wear out the legal ramifications with cash and attorneys.
They never have been able to govern.
nothing more than a trained dog act for the wealthy ... sit, beg, heel, fetch, roll over ...
I don't think that the majority of voters agree with that...
the same majority that voted for a convicted felon that was on his way to conviction of 2 more serious federal indictments before a corrupt SCOTUS majority granted him immunity in a country that allegedly has equal justice?